Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 382.360 (2026)

Discharge of liens by deed or mortgage -- Assignment of mortgage --

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effect. (1) Liens by deed or mortgage may be discharged by an entry acknowledging their satisfaction on the margin of the record thereof, or in the alternative, at the option of the county clerk, in a marginal entry record, signed by the person entitled thereto, or his or her personal representative or agent, and attested by the clerk, or may be discharged by a separate deed of release, which shall recite the date of the instrument and deed book and the page wherein it is recorded. Such release in the case of a mortgage or deed of trust shall have the effect to reinstate the title in the mortgagor or grantor or person entitled thereto. Each entry in the marginal entry record shall be linked to its respective referenced instrument in the indexing system for the referenced instruments. (2) If a lien or mortgage is released by a deed of release, the clerk shall immediately, at the option of the clerk, either link the release and its filing location to its respective referenced instrument in the indexing system for the referenced instrument, or endorse on the margin of the record wherein the lien is retained "Released by deed of release (stating whether in whole or in part) lodged for record (giving date, deed book and page wherein such deed of release may be found)" and the clerk shall also attest such certificate. (3) When a mortgage is assigned to another person, the assignee shall file the assignment for recording with the county clerk within thirty (30) days of the assignment and the county clerk shall attest the assignment and shall note the assignment in the blank space, or in a marginal entry record, beside a listing of the book and page of the document being assigned. Provided, however, that an assignee that reassigns the note prior to the thirtieth day after first acquiring the assignment may request that the subsequent assignee file the unfiled assignment with the new reassignment. (4) Delivering an assignment to the assignee or a lien release to the mortgagor shall not substitute for filing the assignment or release with the county clerk, as required by this section. (5) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, nothing in this chapter shall require the legal holder of any note secured by lien in any deed or mortgage to file a release of any mortgage when the mortgage securing such paid note also secures a note or other obligation which remains unpaid. (6) Failure of an assignee to record a mortgage assignment shall not affect the validity or perfection, or invalidity or lack of perfection, of a mortgage lien under applicable law. Effective: January 1, 2020 History: Amended 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 86, sec. 45, effective January 1, 2020. -- Amended 2006 Ky. Acts ch. 183, sec. 17, effective July 12, 2006. -- Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 323, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1982. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 498.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2022 · leading case: Ellington v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 13 F. Supp. 3d 723 (W.D. Ky. 2014).
Ellington v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 13 F. Supp. 3d 723 (W.D. Ky. 2014). · cites it 46× “KRS § 382.360; KRS § 382.365(2). KRS § 382.”
Christian Cnty. Clerk v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 515 F. App'x 451 (6th Cir. 2013). · cites it 5× “It is undisputed that the Kentucky recording statutes, Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 382.360 and 382.365, do not expressly provide the Clerks with a cause of action.”
Boyd Cnty. ex rel. Hedrick v. Merscorp, Inc., 985 F. Supp. 2d 823 (E.D. Ky. 2013). · cites it 15× “88], Plaintiffs allege the following causes of action: (1) negligent and/or will violation of KRS 382.360 [Docket No. 88 at ¶¶ 107-109], (2) negligent and/or will violation of KRS 434.”
Dallas Cnty., Texas v. MERSCORP, Incorpora, 791 F.3d 545 (5th Cir. 2015). “, Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 382.360(3); Minn.Stat.”
Wells Fargo Fin. Kentucky, Inc. v. Thomer, 315 S.W.3d 335 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). “KRS 382.360. However, as a matter of law, whether or not a formal release occurs, upon full payment of the indebtedness, the instrument of record becomes a nullity.”
Montgomery Cnty. ex rel. Becker v. Merscorp, Inc., 16 F. Supp. 3d 542 (E.D. Pa. 2014). “While the Higgins case obviously required construction of Kentucky law, specifically, KRS 382.360(3), the similarities between that case and this one are striking given the direction contained in the Kentucky statute — "[w]hen a mortgage is assigned to another person, the…”
Forcht v. Forcht Bank, N.A., 533 S.W.3d 695 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017). “KRS 382.360. However, as a matter of-law, whether or not a formal release occurs, upon full payment of the indebtedness, the instrument of record becomes a nullity.”
Bratton v. Citifinancial, Inc., 415 S.W.3d 625 (Ky. 2013). · cites it 2× “(2) An assignee of a lien on real property shall record the assignment in the county clerk’s office as required by KRS 382.360. Failure of an assignee to record a mortgage assignment shall not affect the validity or perfection, or invalidity or lack of perfection, of a mortgage…”
Higgins v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 673 F. App'x 514 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 4× “See Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 382.360 (3) (LexisNexis 2016).”
Whitman v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 2× “(2) An assignee of a lien on real property shall record the assignment in the county clerk’s office as required by KRS 382.360. Failure of an assignee to record a mortgage assignment shall not affect the validity or perfection, or invalidity or lack of perfection, of a mortgage…”
Dunlap v. Fifth Third Mortg. Co. (In Re Kerr), 390 B.R. 334 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2008). “KRS 382.360(1) (emphasis added). In this case, the Release does not recite the date of the instrument on the 9320 Property.”
Mikael Judah & Laura Judah v. EMC Mortg. Corp. (Tex. App. 2015). “While the Higgins case obviously required construction of Kentucky law, specifically, KRS 382.360(3), the similarities between that case and this one are striking given the direction contained in the Kentucky statute - ″[when a mortgage is assigned to another person, the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 382.360(1) — 1 case
Dunlap v. Fifth Third Mortg. Co. (In Re Kerr), 390 B.R. 334 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2008). “KRS 382.360(1) (emphasis added). In this case, the Release does not recite the date of the instrument on the 9320 Property.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 382.360(3) — 9 cases
Ellington v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 13 F. Supp. 3d 723 (W.D. Ky. 2014). “KRS § 382.360; KRS § 382.365(2). KRS § 382.”
Dallas Cnty., Texas v. MERSCORP, Incorpora, 791 F.3d 545 (5th Cir. 2015). “, Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 382.360(3); Minn.Stat.”
Christian Cnty. Clerk v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 515 F. App'x 451 (6th Cir. 2013). “It is undisputed that the Kentucky recording statutes, Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 382.360 and 382.365, do not expressly provide the Clerks with a cause of action.”
Montgomery Cnty. ex rel. Becker v. Merscorp, Inc., 16 F. Supp. 3d 542 (E.D. Pa. 2014). “While the Higgins case obviously required construction of Kentucky law, specifically, KRS 382.360(3), the similarities between that case and this one are striking given the direction contained in the Kentucky statute — "[w]hen a mortgage is assigned to another person, the…”
Boyd Cnty. ex rel. Hedrick v. Merscorp, Inc., 985 F. Supp. 2d 823 (E.D. Ky. 2013). “88], Plaintiffs allege the following causes of action: (1) negligent and/or will violation of KRS 382.360 [Docket No. 88 at ¶¶ 107-109], (2) negligent and/or will violation of KRS 434.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 382.360(6) — 3 cases
Christian Cnty. Clerk v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 515 F. App'x 451 (6th Cir. 2013). “It is undisputed that the Kentucky recording statutes, Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 382.360 and 382.365, do not expressly provide the Clerks with a cause of action.”
Ellington v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 13 F. Supp. 3d 723 (W.D. Ky. 2014). “KRS § 382.360; KRS § 382.365(2). KRS § 382.”
Boyd Cnty. ex rel. Hedrick v. Merscorp, Inc., 985 F. Supp. 2d 823 (E.D. Ky. 2013). “88], Plaintiffs allege the following causes of action: (1) negligent and/or will violation of KRS 382.360 [Docket No. 88 at ¶¶ 107-109], (2) negligent and/or will violation of KRS 434.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 382.360(B) — 1 case
Bratton v. Citifinancial, Inc., 415 S.W.3d 625 (Ky. 2013). “(2) An assignee of a lien on real property shall record the assignment in the county clerk’s office as required by KRS 382.360. Failure of an assignee to record a mortgage assignment shall not affect the validity or perfection, or invalidity or lack of perfection, of a mortgage…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.