(1) Except as provided in KRS 383.505 to 383.715, if there is a material
noncompliance by the tenant with the rental agreement or a material noncompliance
with KRS 383.605 or 383.610, the landlord may deliver a written notice to the
tenant specifying the acts and omissions constituting the breach and that the rental
agreement will terminate upon a date not less than fourteen (14) days after receipt of
the notice. If the breach is not remedied in fifteen (15) days, the rental agreement
shall terminate as provided in the notice subject to the following. If the breach is
remediable by repairs or the payment of damages or otherwise and the tenant
adequately remedies the breach before the date specified in the notice, the rental
agreement shall not terminate. If substantially the same act or omission which
constituted a prior noncompliance of which notice was given recurs within six (6)
months, the landlord may terminate the rental agreement upon at least fourteen (14)
days' written notice specifying the breach and the date of termination of the rental
agreement.
(2) If rent is unpaid when due and the tenant fails to pay rent within seven (7) days after
written notice by the landlord of nonpayment and his intention to terminate the
rental agreement if the rent is not paid within that period, the landlord may
terminate the rental agreement.
(3) Except as provided in KRS 383.505 to 383.715, the landlord may recover damages
and obtain injunctive relief for any noncompliance by the tenant with the rental
agreement or KRS 383.605 or 383.610. If the tenant's noncompliance is willful the
landlord may recover actual damages and reasonable attorney's fees.
Effective: July 13, 1984
History: Repealed and reenacted 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 176, sec. 32, effective July 13,
1984. -- Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 378, sec. 33.
Notes of Decisions
Hous. Auth. of Covington v. Turner, 295 S.W.3d 123 (Ky. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 16× “The district court disagreed and dismissed the action holding that pursuant to KRS 383.660 of the URLTA and the terms of the lease, Turner sufficiently remedied the drug-related criminal activity, engaged in by Jones, by barring him *125 from her apartment.”
O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Est. Co., 365 S.W.3d 584 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 7× “From the record, we are unconvinced that any act or failure to act by O’Rourke meets the required statutory standard.”
Caudill v. Acton, 175 S.W.3d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004).
“42, KRS 383.660 (remedy for failure to pay rent); JCO 151.”
All That N More, LLC v. Roman Kusyo (Ky. Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “O’Rourke considered whether the complaint provided notice to defendant that the plaintiff was seeking attorney’s fees pursuant to KRS 383.660(3), which permits attorney’s fees where the landlord shows “willful noncompliance” with the rental agreement by the tenant.”
Atkins Homes, LLC v. Hope Veinot (Ky. Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 2× “It also asserts the grounds stated for the trial court’s first denial of its request for default – Atkins’ -4- failure to submit proof of notices given to Veinot under KRS 383.660 and KRS 383.695 – was improper.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 383.660(1) — 1 case
Hous. Auth. of Covington v. Turner, 295 S.W.3d 123 (Ky. Ct. App. 2009).
“The district court disagreed and dismissed the action holding that pursuant to KRS 383.660 of the URLTA and the terms of the lease, Turner sufficiently remedied the drug-related criminal activity, engaged in by Jones, by barring him *125 from her apartment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 383.660(3) — 2 cases
O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Est. Co., 365 S.W.3d 584 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
“From the record, we are unconvinced that any act or failure to act by O’Rourke meets the required statutory standard.”
All That N More, LLC v. Roman Kusyo (Ky. Ct. App. 2021).
“O’Rourke considered whether the complaint provided notice to defendant that the plaintiff was seeking attorney’s fees pursuant to KRS 383.660(3), which permits attorney’s fees where the landlord shows “willful noncompliance” with the rental agreement by the tenant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.