Catchline at repeal: Jurisdiction of district courts over incompetent persons and their
committees -- Bond of committee -- Waiver of Bond.
History: Repealed 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 141, sec. 146, effective July 1, 1982. -- Amended
1980 Ky. Acts ch. 147, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1976 (1st Extra.
Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 338, effective January 2, 1978. -- Repealed in part 1942
Ky. Acts ch. 167, secs. 9 and 21. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1,
effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2149, 2152.
Note. 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 396, sec. 150 would have repealed this section effective July 1,
1982. However, 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 396 was repealed by 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 141, sec.
146, also effective July 1, 1982.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1963–2021 · leading case:
Privett v. Clendenin, 52 S.W.3d 530 (Ky. 2001).
Privett v. Clendenin, 52 S.W.3d 530 (Ky. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Porter as follows: Even though KRS 387.210 confers exclusive jurisdiction upon the district court to appoint, remove and require accounting of committees and provides further for appeal to the circuit court from such acts or failure to act there appears to be no power to…”
Lee ex rel. Dawson v. Porter, 598 S.W.2d 465 (Ky. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 2× “The 1976 statutory enactment of KRS 387.210 amended the former provision to the effect: (1) The district (county) courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction of the appointment and accounting of committees.”
Priestley v. Priestley, 949 S.W.2d 594 (Ky. 1997).
“Even though KRS 387.210 confers exclusive jurisdiction upon the district court to appoint, remove and require accounting of committees and provides further for appeal to the circuit court from such acts or failure to act there appears to be no power to entertain actions…”
Powers v. Citizens Union Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 221 F. Supp. 617 (E.D. Ky. 1963).
· cites it 3× “Bonnie Milbourn, Deputy Clerk, Fayette County Court), and on July 26, 1947, the County Court made the following order (KRS § 387.210): “It appearing to the Court that William J.”
Harper v. Martin, 552 S.W.2d 690 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977).
“It appears to us approval was proper because the approval of the final settlement in the County Court was a final disposition from which no appeal was taken.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 387.210(1) — 1 case
Harper v. Martin, 552 S.W.2d 690 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977).
“It appears to us approval was proper because the approval of the final settlement in the County Court was a final disposition from which no appeal was taken.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.