Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.710 (2026)

Repealed, 1984

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Protective orders by court. History: Repealed 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 152, sec. 16, effective July 13, 1984. -- Created 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 93, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1980. Legislative Research Commission Note. This section was amended by 1984 Acts Chapter 111, § 160 (the Revisor's Bill). Pursuant to KRS 7.123, the repeal by the nonrevisory Act prevails.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1962–2008 · leading case: Gomez v. Gomez, 254 S.W.3d 838 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
Gomez v. Gomez, 254 S.W.3d 838 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008). “Nor do we find any language in the domestic violence and abuse statutes, KRS 403.710 et seq., to support Appellant’s position that district courts retain exclusive jurisdiction over domestic violence matters unless an EPO is issued.”
Stevenson v. Higgins, 619 S.W.2d 42 (Ky. Ct. App. 1981). “Furthermore, there is a legal authority for the jurisdiction of the circuit court to enter whatever orders are necessary to protect the parties under KRS 403.710. The granting of this relief does not divest the petitioner of title to the property.”
Haubner v. Ribicoff, 207 F. Supp. 430 (E.D. Ky. 1962). “Moreover, the existence of these letters does not mean that Plaintiff has attempted to present *432 his case to the Appeals Council for a formal adjudication and this is what determines this case. The Appeals Council decision is the “final decision of the Secretary” for the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.710(e) — 1 case
Haubner v. Ribicoff, 207 F. Supp. 430 (E.D. Ky. 1962). “Moreover, the existence of these letters does not mean that Plaintiff has attempted to present *432 his case to the Appeals Council for a formal adjudication and this is what determines this case. The Appeals Council decision is the “final decision of the Secretary” for the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.