(1) As used in this section and KRS 411.186, unless the context requires otherwise:
(a) "Oppression" means conduct which is specifically intended by the defendant
to subject the plaintiff to cruel and unjust hardship.
(b) "Fraud" means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of
material fact known to the defendant and made with the intention of causing
injury to the plaintiff.
(c) "Malice" means either conduct which is specifically intended by the defendant
to cause tangible or intangible injury to the plaintiff or conduct that is carried
out by the defendant both with a flagrant indifference to the rights of the
plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that such conduct will result in
human death or bodily harm.
(d) "Plaintiff" means any party claiming punitive damages.
(e) "Defendant" means any party against whom punitive damages are sought.
(f) "Punitive damages" includes exemplary damages and means damages, other
than compensatory and nominal damages, awarded against a person to punish
and to discourage him and others from similar conduct in the future.
(2) A plaintiff shall recover punitive damages only upon proving, by clear and
convincing evidence, that the defendant from whom such damages are sought acted
toward the plaintiff with oppression, fraud or malice.
(3) In no case shall punitive damages be assessed against a principal or employer for
the act of an agent or employee unless such principal or employer authorized or
ratified or should have anticipated the conduct in question.
(4) In no case shall punitive damages be awarded for breach of contract.
(5) This statute is applicable to all cases in which punitive damages are sought and
supersedes any and all existing statutory or judicial law insofar as such law is
inconsistent with the provisions of this statute.
Effective: July 15, 1988
History: Created 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 224, sec. 2, effective July 15, 1988.
Notes of Decisions
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
· cites it 58× “KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Williams v. Wilson, 972 S.W.2d 260 (Ky. 1998).
· cites it 52× “20) to consider whether KRS 411.184 violates one or more provisions of the Constitution of Kentucky, thereby rendering the statute invalid and unenforceable.”
Stewart v. Est. of Cooper, 102 S.W.3d 913 (Ky. 2003).
· cites it 48× “The trial court then granted the estate's motion to dismiss Appellant's punitive damage *914 claim and ruled that KRS 411.184 does not authorize a punitive damage award against a partysuch as the decedent driver's estatethat did not act toward Appellants with oppression,…”
Osborne v. Keeney, 399 S.W.3d 1 (Ky. 2012).
· cites it 25× “Aside from the failure to conform to the purpose of punitive damages, the plain language of KRS 411.184 prohibits the recovery of lost punitive damages by a legal-malpractice plaintiff.”
Kentucky Dep't of Corr. v. McCullough, 123 S.W.3d 130 (Ky. 2004).
· cites it 26× “The Court of Appeals further reasoned that KRS 411.184 and KRS 411.186 make punitive damages available in all actions except breach-of-contract actions.”
Phelps v. Louisville Water Co., 103 S.W.3d 46 (Ky. 2003).
· cites it 12× “LWC also argues that the correct standard for awarding punitive damages is found in KRS 411.184, which provides that the plaintiff must show that a defendant acted both "with a flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that such conduct…”
Bowling Green Mun. Utils. v. Atmos Energy Corp., 989 S.W.2d 577 (Ky. 1999).
· cites it 18× “DID THE COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN RULING THAT THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE, AS A MATTER OF LAW, TO JUSTIFY THE AWARD OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES? The Court of Appeals, after examining the evidence relative to the propriety of allowing punitive damages, declared that under the…”
Desai v. Charter Commc'ns, LLC, 381 F. Supp. 3d 774 (W.D. Ky. 2019).
· cites it 11× “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184 Kentucky's punitive-damages statute provides that "[a] plaintiff shall recover punitive damages only upon proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant from whom such damages are sought acted toward the plaintiff with oppression, fraud or…”
Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 83 S.W.3d 483 (Ky. 2002).
· cites it 4× “At the time this case was tried, the controlling legal standard for punitive damages in Kentucky was found in KRS 411.184(1)(c) and required a determination that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that…”
Berrier v. Bizer, 57 S.W.3d 271 (Ky. 2001).
· cites it 4× “KRS 411.184(3) provides: In no case shall punitive damages be assessed against a principal or employer for the act of an agent or employee unless such principal or employer authorized or ratified or should have anticipated the conduct in question.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(1) — 9 cases
Stewart v. Est. of Cooper, 102 S.W.3d 913 (Ky. 2003).
“The trial court then granted the estate's motion to dismiss Appellant's punitive damage *914 claim and ruled that KRS 411.184 does not authorize a punitive damage award against a partysuch as the decedent driver's estatethat did not act toward Appellants with oppression,…”
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(1)(C) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(1)(a) — 4 cases
Kentucky Dep't of Corr. v. McCullough, 123 S.W.3d 130 (Ky. 2004).
“The Court of Appeals further reasoned that KRS 411.184 and KRS 411.186 make punitive damages available in all actions except breach-of-contract actions.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(1)(b) — 6 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(1)(c) — 14 cases
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Phelps v. Louisville Water Co., 103 S.W.3d 46 (Ky. 2003).
“LWC also argues that the correct standard for awarding punitive damages is found in KRS 411.184, which provides that the plaintiff must show that a defendant acted both "with a flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that such conduct…”
Williams v. Wilson, 972 S.W.2d 260 (Ky. 1998).
“20) to consider whether KRS 411.184 violates one or more provisions of the Constitution of Kentucky, thereby rendering the statute invalid and unenforceable.”
Stewart v. Est. of Cooper, 102 S.W.3d 913 (Ky. 2003).
“The trial court then granted the estate's motion to dismiss Appellant's punitive damage *914 claim and ruled that KRS 411.184 does not authorize a punitive damage award against a partysuch as the decedent driver's estatethat did not act toward Appellants with oppression,…”
Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 83 S.W.3d 483 (Ky. 2002).
“At the time this case was tried, the controlling legal standard for punitive damages in Kentucky was found in KRS 411.184(1)(c) and required a determination that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(1)(f) — 9 cases
Stewart v. Est. of Cooper, 102 S.W.3d 913 (Ky. 2003).
“The trial court then granted the estate's motion to dismiss Appellant's punitive damage *914 claim and ruled that KRS 411.184 does not authorize a punitive damage award against a partysuch as the decedent driver's estatethat did not act toward Appellants with oppression,…”
Osborne v. Keeney, 399 S.W.3d 1 (Ky. 2012).
“Aside from the failure to conform to the purpose of punitive damages, the plain language of KRS 411.184 prohibits the recovery of lost punitive damages by a legal-malpractice plaintiff.”
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Kentucky Dep't of Corr. v. McCullough, 123 S.W.3d 130 (Ky. 2004).
“The Court of Appeals further reasoned that KRS 411.184 and KRS 411.186 make punitive damages available in all actions except breach-of-contract actions.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(2) — 76 cases
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Stewart v. Est. of Cooper, 102 S.W.3d 913 (Ky. 2003).
“The trial court then granted the estate's motion to dismiss Appellant's punitive damage *914 claim and ruled that KRS 411.184 does not authorize a punitive damage award against a partysuch as the decedent driver's estatethat did not act toward Appellants with oppression,…”
Osborne v. Keeney, 399 S.W.3d 1 (Ky. 2012).
“Aside from the failure to conform to the purpose of punitive damages, the plain language of KRS 411.184 prohibits the recovery of lost punitive damages by a legal-malpractice plaintiff.”
Williams v. Wilson, 972 S.W.2d 260 (Ky. 1998).
“20) to consider whether KRS 411.184 violates one or more provisions of the Constitution of Kentucky, thereby rendering the statute invalid and unenforceable.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(3) — 24 cases
Berrier v. Bizer, 57 S.W.3d 271 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184(3) provides: In no case shall punitive damages be assessed against a principal or employer for the act of an agent or employee unless such principal or employer authorized or ratified or should have anticipated the conduct in question.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(4) — 23 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(5) — 5 cases
Kentucky Dep't of Corr. v. McCullough, 123 S.W.3d 130 (Ky. 2004).
“The Court of Appeals further reasoned that KRS 411.184 and KRS 411.186 make punitive damages available in all actions except breach-of-contract actions.”
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Desai v. Charter Commc'ns, LLC, 381 F. Supp. 3d 774 (W.D. Ky. 2019).
“Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184 Kentucky's punitive-damages statute provides that "[a] plaintiff shall recover punitive damages only upon proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant from whom such damages are sought acted toward the plaintiff with oppression, fraud or…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(c) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(f) — 2 cases
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 83 S.W.3d 483 (Ky. 2002).
“At the time this case was tried, the controlling legal standard for punitive damages in Kentucky was found in KRS 411.184(1)(c) and required a determination that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(l)(a) — 4 cases
Kentucky Dep't of Corr. v. McCullough, 123 S.W.3d 130 (Ky. 2004).
“The Court of Appeals further reasoned that KRS 411.184 and KRS 411.186 make punitive damages available in all actions except breach-of-contract actions.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(l)(b) — 6 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(l)(c) — 12 cases
Phelps v. Louisville Water Co., 103 S.W.3d 46 (Ky. 2003).
“LWC also argues that the correct standard for awarding punitive damages is found in KRS 411.184, which provides that the plaintiff must show that a defendant acted both "with a flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that such conduct…”
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Williams v. Wilson, 972 S.W.2d 260 (Ky. 1998).
“20) to consider whether KRS 411.184 violates one or more provisions of the Constitution of Kentucky, thereby rendering the statute invalid and unenforceable.”
Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 83 S.W.3d 483 (Ky. 2002).
“At the time this case was tried, the controlling legal standard for punitive damages in Kentucky was found in KRS 411.184(1)(c) and required a determination that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference to the rights of the plaintiff and with a subjective awareness that…”
Berrier v. Bizer, 57 S.W.3d 271 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184(3) provides: In no case shall punitive damages be assessed against a principal or employer for the act of an agent or employee unless such principal or employer authorized or ratified or should have anticipated the conduct in question.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 411.184(l)(f) — 5 cases
Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36 S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2001).
“KRS 411.184 became effective July 15, 1988, before this Court's decision in Curry [38] adopting the three-part test for a bad faith claim from the dissent in Federal Kemper .”
Kentucky Dep't of Corr. v. McCullough, 123 S.W.3d 130 (Ky. 2004).
“The Court of Appeals further reasoned that KRS 411.184 and KRS 411.186 make punitive damages available in all actions except breach-of-contract actions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.