Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016
Repealed, 1975
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: "Disorderly conduct" defined -- Penalty. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 336, effective January 1, 1975. -- Created 1968 Ky. Acts ch. 105, sec. 7.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1971–2016 · leading case: Colten v. Kentucky
Colten v. Kentucky (1972)
“Another officer asked three times that Colten depart and when Colten failed to move away he was arrested for violating Kentucky's disorderly conduct statute, Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016 (Supp. 1968). The arresting officer testified that Colten's response to the order had been to…”
City of Houston v. Hill (1987)
“" Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968); see 407 U.”
Polk v. State (2003)
“Compare § 121(b)(3) ("[a] person may not willfully fail to obey a reasonable and lawful order that a law enforcement officer makes to prevent a disturbance to the public peace") with Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp.1968) ("[a] person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with…”
Commonwealth v. Duncan (1976)
“In Colten , the petitioner had been convicted of violating Ky.Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1) (f) (Supp. 1968), which read as follows: "(1) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof,…”
Commonwealth v. DeFrancesco (1978)
“[4] Colten was convicted of violating Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968), which states: "(1) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: * * * * * * "(f) Congregates…”
State v. Immelt (2011)
“at 108-09 (affirming conviction under statute prohibiting *37 conduct done “ ‘to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof’ ” (quoting former Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(l)(f) (1968))). In accord with the First Amendment, article I,…”
Martinez v. City of Rio Rancho (2016)
“1953 (quoting Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968)).”
State v. Crudup (2004)
“” The defendant in Colten was convicted of violating Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 437.016 (1) (f) (Sup.”
Colten v. Commonwealth (1971)
“Lewis Colten was convicted in the Fay-ette Quarterly Court of a violation of the Kentucky disorderly conduct statute, KRS 437.016, and was fined $10. He appealed to the Fayette Circuit Court where he was tried de novo (without a jury, it having been waived) and again was found…”
Martin v. City of Oklahoma City (2016)
“1953 (quoting Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(l)(f) (Supp. 1968)).”
DeWillis v. State (1997)
“2d 584 (1972) (quoting Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp.1968)).”
Brooks v. N.C. Department of Correction (1997)
“at 1956 (quoting Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(l)(f) (Supp.1968)).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Duncan (1976)
“In Colten , the petitioner had been convicted of violating Ky.Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1) (f) (Supp. 1968), which read as follows: "(1) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof,…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) — 6 cases
City of Houston v. Hill (1987)
“" Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968); see 407 U.”
Polk v. State (2003)
“Compare § 121(b)(3) ("[a] person may not willfully fail to obey a reasonable and lawful order that a law enforcement officer makes to prevent a disturbance to the public peace") with Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp.1968) ("[a] person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with…”
Martinez v. City of Rio Rancho (2016)
“1953 (quoting Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968)).”
DeWillis v. State (1997)
“2d 584 (1972) (quoting Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp.1968)).”
Commonwealth v. DeFrancesco (1978)
“[4] Colten was convicted of violating Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968), which states: "(1) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: * * * * * * "(f) Congregates…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(l)(f) — 6 cases
City of Houston v. Hill (1987)
“" Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968); see 407 U.”
Polk v. State (2003)
“Compare § 121(b)(3) ("[a] person may not willfully fail to obey a reasonable and lawful order that a law enforcement officer makes to prevent a disturbance to the public peace") with Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp.1968) ("[a] person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with…”
State v. Immelt (2011)
“at 108-09 (affirming conviction under statute prohibiting *37 conduct done “ ‘to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof’ ” (quoting former Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(l)(f) (1968))). In accord with the First Amendment, article I,…”
Martin v. City of Oklahoma City (2016)
“1953 (quoting Ky. Rev. Stat. § 437.016(l)(f) (Supp. 1968)).”
Commonwealth v. DeFrancesco (1978)
“[4] Colten was convicted of violating Ky.Rev.Stat. § 437.016(1)(f) (Supp. 1968), which states: "(1) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: * * * * * * "(f) Congregates…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.