Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 439
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 439.560 (2026)

Repealed, 2002

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Compact with other states for out-of-state parolee supervision. History: Repealed 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 473, sec. 3, effective June 19, 2002. -- Created 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 101, sec. 31, effective May 18, 1956.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1963–2003 · leading case: Crady v. Cranfill, 371 S.W.2d 640 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Crady v. Cranfill, 371 S.W.2d 640 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). · cites it 3× “See KRS 439.560. In July of 1962 they were convicted in Georgia on charges of illegal possession of burglars’ tools and were fined $1,000 each and sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary.”
Stallworth v. Commonwealth, 102 S.W.3d 918 (Ky. 2003). · cites it 2× “could validly amend the final judgment, the twenty (20) year sentence cannot be enforced because the trial court failed to make that amendment without undue delay; and (3) the Commonwealth of Kentucky has forfeited its right to incarcerate Appellant for any term of imprisonment…”
Shull v. Wingo, 446 S.W.2d 645 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “KRS 439.560. On November 30, 1965, in the Daviess Circuit Court he was convicted of possessing burglary tools and sentenced to six years in the Eddyville penitentiary.”
Brewster v. Luby, 380 S.W.2d 261 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “This action was taken pursuant to KRS 439.560, which provides for interstate compacts relating to reciprocal supervision of parolees among the states.”
Turner v. Thomas, 383 S.W.2d 379 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “In the instant case the petitioner was permitted to reside in Illinois, presumably under authority of the Uniform Act for Out-of-State Parolee Supervision, KRS 439.560. He did not go to Illinois as a prisoner in fact or to face arrest or prosecution there.”
Wright v. Renaker, 387 S.W.2d 588 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “In short, we hold that the privilege of determining whether South Carolina has lost that right should rest exclusively with the courts of that state.”
Jones v. Black, 468 S.W.2d 274 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971). “The United States District Court simply held that he should no longer be incarcerated in jail while awaiting the arrival of officers from Kentucky and ordered his release. This order had no effect upon the right of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to return him to this state for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.