Ky. Rev. Stat. § 531.330

Presumption as to minority

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) For purposes of KRS 529.040 where the offense involves commercial sexual activity and for the purposes of KRS 530.070, 531.080, and 531.300 to 531.370, any person who appears to be under the age of eighteen (18), or under the age of sixteen (16), shall be presumed to be under the age of eighteen (18), or under the age of sixteen (16), as the case may be. (2) In any prosecution under KRS 529.040 where the offense involves commercial sexual activity by a minor and in any prosecution under KRS 530.070, 531.080, and 531.300 to 531.370, the defendant may prove in exculpation that he or she in good faith reasonably believed that the person involved in the performance was not a minor. (3) In any prosecution under KRS 531.300 to 531.370 where the offense involves a computer-generated image that used an actual minor or minors as the source, the presumption of minority shall be the age of the actual minor or minors. (4) The presumption raised in subsection (1) or (3) of this section may be rebutted by any competent evidence. Effective: July 15, 2024 History: Amended 2024 Ky. Acts ch. 15, sec. 9, effective July 15, 2024. -- Amended 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 122, sec. 4, effective June 24, 2015. -- Amended 2007 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 14, effective June 26, 2007. -- Created 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 219, sec. 5, effective June 17, 1978.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Hause v. Commonwealth
Hause v. Commonwealth (2001) kyctapp · cites it 19× “On appeal, Hause asserts that: (1) the circuit court erred in failing to declare KRS 531.330 and KRS 531.340 unconstitutionally overbroad; (2) the court erred in failing to declare KRS 531.”
Love v. Commonwealth (2001) ky · cites it 2× “030; see also KRS 531.330(2). Also illustrative is KRS 513.”
Outmezguine v. State (1994) md · cites it 2× “1992); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 531.330 (Michie/Bobbs-Merrill 1985); Va.”
United States v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (1988) ca9 “, Ky. Rev.Stat.Ann. § 531.330(2) (Michie 1985); N.”
Bennett D. Couch v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2024) ky · cites it 7× “Couch raises two primary issues: (i) the constitutionality of KRS 531.330’s presumption as to minority; and (ii) the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress the search of her apartment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 531.330(2) — 3 cases
Love v. Commonwealth (2001) ky “030; see also KRS 531.330(2). Also illustrative is KRS 513.”
Hause v. Commonwealth (2001) kyctapp “On appeal, Hause asserts that: (1) the circuit court erred in failing to declare KRS 531.330 and KRS 531.340 unconstitutionally overbroad; (2) the court erred in failing to declare KRS 531.”
United States v. United States District Court for the Central District of California (1988) ca9 “, Ky. Rev.Stat.Ann. § 531.330(2) (Michie 1985); N.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 531.330(3) — 1 case
Hause v. Commonwealth (2001) kyctapp “On appeal, Hause asserts that: (1) the circuit court erred in failing to declare KRS 531.330 and KRS 531.340 unconstitutionally overbroad; (2) the court erred in failing to declare KRS 531.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.