Ky. Rev. Stat. § 620.027

District Court's concurrent jurisdiction for child custody and visitation in

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

permanent placement cases. The District Court has jurisdiction, concurrent with that of the Circuit Court, to determine matters of child custody and visitation in cases that come before the District Court where the need for a permanent placement and custody order is established as set forth in this chapter. The District Court, in making these determinations, shall utilize the provisions of KRS Chapter 403 relating to child custody and visitation. In any case where the child is actually residing with a grandparent in a stable relationship, the court may recognize the grandparent as having the same standing as a parent for evaluating what custody arrangements are in the best interest of the child. Effective: July 14, 2000 History: Amended 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 60, sec. 5, effective July 14, 2000. -- Created 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 314, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1996.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: London v. Collins
London v. Collins (2007) kyctapp · cites it 2× “Accepting that statement and without hearing any evidence, the Court signed an order awarding permanent custody to LaTonya, pursuant to KRS 620.027. Significantly, Steven was not represented by counsel at that hearing, was not advised of his right to counsel or of his rights as…”
Richardson v. Richardson (2000) fla “" See Idaho Code § 32-717 (1996); see also Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 620.027 (Michie 1999) (same).”
L.D. v. J.H. (2011) kyctapp · cites it 4× “270, the family court correctly determined that because this *831 matter originated as a dependency, abuse and neglect case under KRS Chapter 620, Appellees’ standing is conferred by virtue of KRS 620.027, which provides in relevant part: “In any case where the child is actually…”
B.C. v. B.T. (2005) kyctapp “KRS 620.027 (stating that "[i]n any case where the child is actually residing with a grandparent in a stable relationship, the court may recognize the grandparent as having the same standing as a parent for evaluating what custody arrangements are in the best interest of the…”
N.L. v. W.F. (2012) kyctapp “The family court based its authority to hold a permanent custody hearing on KRS 620.027, which provides as follows: The District Court has jurisdiction, concurrent with that of the Circuit Court, to determine matters of child custody and visitation in cases that come before the…”
Kelsey Hayse v. Travis Martin (2023) kyctapp · cites it 15× “The Court separately found that Grandmother had standing to seek custody under KRS 620.027. Based on these findings, the Court concluded that it was in the best interest of Child to continue the temporary joint-custody arrangement.”
P.B. v. Commonwealth of Kentu Cky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services (2025) kyctapp · cites it 8× “KRS 620.027 states: “In any case where the child is actually residing with a grandparent in a stable relationship, the court may recognize the grandparent as having the same standing as a parent for evaluating what custody arrangements are in the best interest of the child.”
Ld v. Jh (2011) kyctapp · cites it 4× “270, the family court correctly determined that because this *831 matter originated as a dependency, abuse and neglect case under KRS Chapter 620, Appellees' standing is conferred by virtue of KRS 620.027, which provides in relevant part: "In any case where the child is actually…”
S. F. v. Steven R. Crebessa (2021) kyctapp · cites it 5× “We agree with the circuit court’s well-reasoned analysis: The essence of [Mother’s] argument is that KRS 620.027 only allows a District Court to determine child custody and visitation where the need for a permanent placement and custody order is established.”
2026 Ca Admin - Non-Confidential Opinion - 003 (2026) kyctapp · cites it 5× “Father later filed a motion which argued that KRS 620.027 was unconstitutional. KRS 620.”
Tatum Beth Bailey v. Gerald H. Bailey (2022) kyctapp · cites it 3× “Jurisdiction: Although Tatum has quoted KRS 620.027, she fails to recognize its import.”
Bc v. Bt (2005) kyctapp “(g) The extent to which the child has been cared for, nurtured, and supported by any de facto custodian; (h) The intent of the parent or parents in placing the child with a de facto custodian; and (i) The circumstances under which the child was placed or allowed to remain the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.