Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 64.300 (2026)

Exemption from fees of notaries public

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No fee or compensation shall be allowed or paid for affixing the jurat of a notary public to any application, affidavit, certificate or other paper necessary to be filed in support of any claim for the benefits of federal legislation for any person or his dependents who has served as a member of the National Guard or a reserve component or as an active member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Marine Corps of the United States. Effective: July 15, 2016 History: Amended 2016 Ky. Acts ch. 46, sec. 1, effective July 15, 2016. -- Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 360, sec. 13, effective July 15, 1982. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 89, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1746.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1961–2021 · leading case: Johnathan Davis on Behalf of Himself & a Class of Similarly Situated v. Norton Healthcare, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Johnathan Davis on Behalf of Himself & a Class of Similarly Situated v. Norton Healthcare, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 9× “Davis claims Norton violated KRS 64.300 by charging an excessive notary fee and violated KRS 422.”

Grise v. Combs, 342 S.W.2d 680 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “190 (Exemption from payment of fees for vital statistics records). No one would contend that these statutes were conceived as granting privileges and emoluments for special public services under section 3 of the Constitution.”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 64.300(1) — 1 case

Johnathan Davis on Behalf of Himself & a Class of Similarly Situated v. Norton Healthcare, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “Davis claims Norton violated KRS 64.300 by charging an excessive notary fee and violated KRS 422.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.