governments and cities on DLG's registry of cities that belonged to the second
and third classes on January 1, 2014.
(1) (a) The provisions of this section shall only apply to members of police and fire
departments in urban-county governments and those cities that are included in
the Department for Local Government registry created pursuant to subsection
(9) of this section.
(b) This section shall only apply to a member of the police department when the
provisions of KRS 15.520 do not apply.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section no member of the police or fire
department in cities listed on the registry pursuant to subsection (9) of this section
or an urban-county government shall be reprimanded in writing, dismissed,
suspended, or reduced in grade or pay for any reason except inefficiency,
misconduct, insubordination, or violation of law or of the rules adopted by the
legislative body, and only after charges are preferred and a hearing conducted as
provided in this section.
(3) (a) Any person may file a complaint against a member of the fire department by
filing it with the clerk of the legislative body who shall immediately
communicate the same to the legislative body. Any person may file a
complaint against a member of the police department pursuant to KRS 15.520.
(b) Subject to the provisions of KRS 15.520, the mayor, city manager, or
legislative body shall, whenever probable cause appears, prefer charges
against any member the mayor, city manager, or legislative body believes to
be guilty of conduct justifying his dismissal or punishment. The charges shall
be written and shall set out clearly the charges made.
(c) The mayor, city manager, or legislative body preferring the charges may
withdraw them at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing. The charges
may thereupon be dismissed.
(4) (a) Upon the hearing all charges shall be considered traversed and put in issue,
and the trial shall be confined to matters related to the issues presented.
Unless otherwise agreed by the legislative body and the member charged, the
legislative body shall proceed to hear the charges within ten (10) days after the
charges were filed.
(b) At least five (5) days before the hearing the member accused shall be served
with a copy of the charges and a statement of the day, place, and hour at which
the hearing of the charges will begin.
(c) The member accused may, in writing, waive the service of charges and
demand trial within ten (10) days after the charges are filed with the clerk.
(5) The legislative body may summon and compel attendance of witnesses at hearings
by subpoena issued by the clerk of that body and served upon the witnesses by any
officer authorized to serve court subpoenas. If any witness fails to appear in
response to a summons or refuses to testify concerning any matter on which he may
lawfully be interrogated, any District Judge, on application of the commission, may
compel obedience by proceedings for contempt as in the case of disobedience of a
subpoena issued from the District Court. The member accused may have
subpoenaed any witnesses he may desire, upon furnishing their names to the clerk.
The action and decision of the body on the charges shall be reduced to writing and
entered in a book kept for that purpose, and the written charges filed in the matter
shall be attached to the book containing the decision.
(6) When the appointing authority or the head of the department has probable cause to
believe a member of the police or fire department has been guilty of conduct
justifying dismissal or punishment, he or she or it may suspend the member from
duty or from both pay and duty, pending trial, and the member shall not be placed
on duty, or allowed pay, until the charges are heard. If the member is suspended,
there shall be no continuances granted without the consent of the member accused.
(7) The legislative body shall fix the punishment of a member of the police or fire
department found guilty, by a reprimand in writing, suspension for any length of
time not to exceed six (6) months, by reducing the grade if the accused is an officer,
or by combining any two (2) or more of those punishments, or by dismissal from the
service.
(8) A member of a police or fire department found guilty pursuant to the provisions of
this section shall have the right to appeal to the Circuit Court under KRS 95.460.
(9) On or before January 1, 2015, the Department for Local Government shall create a
registry of cities that shall be required to comply with the provisions of this section.
The Department for Local Government shall include each of those cities on the
registry that were classified as cities of the second or third class as of January 1,
2014. The Department for Local Government shall make the information included
on the registry available to the public by publishing it on its Web site.
Effective: July 14, 2022
History: Amended 2022 Ky. Acts ch. 191, sec. 4, effective July 14, 2022. -- Amended
2014 Ky. Acts ch. 92, sec. 112, effective January 1, 2015. -- Amended 1976 (1st
Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 115, effective January 2, 1978. -- Amended 1976
Ky. Acts ch. 165, sec. 1. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 248, sec. 7. -- Amended
1956 Ky. Acts ch. 246, sec. 14, effective May 18, 1956. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts
ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 3138-1, 3138-4,
3235dd-35, 3351a-2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
35
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1946–2025 · leading case:
Martin v. City of Glasgow, 882 F. Supp. 2d 903 (W.D. Ky. 2012).
Martin v. City of Glasgow, 882 F. Supp. 2d 903 (W.D. Ky. 2012).
· cites it 44× “Defendants acknowledge that the meeting held on March 16 did not satisfy the procedural requirements of KRS § 95.450. On April 14, Defendants realized their mistake and attempted to undo the error.”
Pearce v. Univ. of Louisville ex rel. Bd. of Trs., 448 S.W.3d 746 (Ky. 2014).
· cites it 7× “KRS 95.450 provides that members of police departments in second- or third-class cities or urban-county governments may only be “reprimanded, dismissed, suspended or reduced in grade or pay” for “inefficiency, misconduct, insubordination or violation of law or of the rules…”
Holsclaw v. Stephens, 507 S.W.2d 462 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974).
· cites it 6× “05 permitting the Civil Service Commission to hear disciplinary cases against policemen and firemen, this provision being invalidated on the ground that it was contrary to KRS 95.450, which relates to the disciplining of policemen and firemen in cities of the second or third…”
Rottinghaus v. Bd. of Commissioners, 603 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979).
· cites it 5× “KRS 95.450 requires a hearing of charges before any suspension, dismissal, reprimand or reduction in grade of any member of a second or third-class city police department.”
Beckham v. City of Bowling Green, 743 S.W.2d 858 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 6× “BG86-50 is invalid for the following reasons: (1) the city cannot reduce the pay grade of members of its police force absent disciplinary justification as delineated in KRS 95.450; (2) the members of the police department have a property interest in their employment and rate of…”
Palmer v. Driggers, 60 S.W.3d 591 (Ky. Ct. App. 2001).
“We believe the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the underlying basis for a disciplinary charge against a police officer who has been charged "with misconduct under KRS 95.450. While the allegations of misconduct by Palmer are of a personal nature, we hold that the…”
Brown v. Jefferson Cnty. Police Merit Bd., 751 S.W.2d 23 (Ky. 1988).
· cites it 2× “g that “all appointments from the Police Eligibility List shall be for an initial probationary period of one year,” and “that until such time as the appointee has successfully completed this one-year probationary period he is not to be considered a permanent employee and,…”
Frederick v. Combs, 354 S.W.2d 506 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962).
· cites it 6× “the method of removal set forth in KRS 95.450 was exclusive. These statutes are the police and firemen’s civil service laws for second and third class cities.”
Mason v. Seaton, Mayor, 198 S.W.2d 205 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946).
· cites it 6× “Appellant’s petition alleges the filing of the written charges pursuant to KRS 95.450' which requires a hearing on charges of this nature within three days from the time they are filed.”
Abney v. City of Winchester ex rel. Stephenson, 558 S.W.2d 622 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977).
· cites it 2× “Appellants, thirty-two full-time firefighters for the City of Winchester, Kentucky, are appealing their discharge as city firefighters following a hearing pursuant to KRS 95.450 on charges of misconduct for failure to report for duty at the 7:00 A.”
Blair v. City of Winchester, 743 S.W.2d 28 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 4× “2d 236, 238 (1939), which, in discussing the predecessor to KRS 95.450, held that the legislature intended that policemen and firemen be removed “from the contaminating influence of local politics and to thereby guarantee efficiency in service and to assure incumbents of the…”
City of Richmond v. Howell, 448 S.W.2d 662 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969).
· cites it 2× “The legislative body of the appellant city of Richmond, a third-class city, preferred five charges against appellee, policeman Walker Howell, and after a hearing dismissed him (KRS 95.450). He appealed to the circuit court (KRS 95.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.450(1) — 12 cases
Martin v. City of Glasgow, 882 F. Supp. 2d 903 (W.D. Ky. 2012).
“Defendants acknowledge that the meeting held on March 16 did not satisfy the procedural requirements of KRS § 95.450. On April 14, Defendants realized their mistake and attempted to undo the error.”
Pearce v. Univ. of Louisville ex rel. Bd. of Trs., 448 S.W.3d 746 (Ky. 2014).
“KRS 95.450 provides that members of police departments in second- or third-class cities or urban-county governments may only be “reprimanded, dismissed, suspended or reduced in grade or pay” for “inefficiency, misconduct, insubordination or violation of law or of the rules…”
Holsclaw v. Stephens, 507 S.W.2d 462 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974).
“05 permitting the Civil Service Commission to hear disciplinary cases against policemen and firemen, this provision being invalidated on the ground that it was contrary to KRS 95.450, which relates to the disciplining of policemen and firemen in cities of the second or third…”
Rottinghaus v. Bd. of Commissioners, 603 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979).
“KRS 95.450 requires a hearing of charges before any suspension, dismissal, reprimand or reduction in grade of any member of a second or third-class city police department.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.450(2) — 5 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.450(3) — 3 cases
Martin v. City of Glasgow, 882 F. Supp. 2d 903 (W.D. Ky. 2012).
“Defendants acknowledge that the meeting held on March 16 did not satisfy the procedural requirements of KRS § 95.450. On April 14, Defendants realized their mistake and attempted to undo the error.”
Blair v. City of Winchester, 743 S.W.2d 28 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
“2d 236, 238 (1939), which, in discussing the predecessor to KRS 95.450, held that the legislature intended that policemen and firemen be removed “from the contaminating influence of local politics and to thereby guarantee efficiency in service and to assure incumbents of the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.450(4) — 1 case
Martin v. City of Glasgow, 882 F. Supp. 2d 903 (W.D. Ky. 2012).
“Defendants acknowledge that the meeting held on March 16 did not satisfy the procedural requirements of KRS § 95.450. On April 14, Defendants realized their mistake and attempted to undo the error.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.450(5) — 3 cases
Pearce v. Univ. of Louisville ex rel. Bd. of Trs., 448 S.W.3d 746 (Ky. 2014).
“KRS 95.450 provides that members of police departments in second- or third-class cities or urban-county governments may only be “reprimanded, dismissed, suspended or reduced in grade or pay” for “inefficiency, misconduct, insubordination or violation of law or of the rules…”
Martin v. City of Glasgow, 882 F. Supp. 2d 903 (W.D. Ky. 2012).
“Defendants acknowledge that the meeting held on March 16 did not satisfy the procedural requirements of KRS § 95.450. On April 14, Defendants realized their mistake and attempted to undo the error.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.450(6) — 2 cases
Pearce v. Univ. of Louisville ex rel. Bd. of Trs., 448 S.W.3d 746 (Ky. 2014).
“KRS 95.450 provides that members of police departments in second- or third-class cities or urban-county governments may only be “reprimanded, dismissed, suspended or reduced in grade or pay” for “inefficiency, misconduct, insubordination or violation of law or of the rules…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.