La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 10:4-101 (2026)

CHAPTER 4. BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CHAPTER 4. BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS

PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS

§4-101. Short title

This Chapter may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code -- Bank Deposits and Collections.

Acts 1992, No. 1133, §4, eff. July 1, 1993; Acts 1993, No. 948, §10, eff. Jan. 1, 1994; Acts 2006, No. 533, §4.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2022 · leading case: Brooks v. Transamerica Fin. Advisors, 57 So. 3d 1153 (La. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brooks v. Transamerica Fin. Advisors, 57 So. 3d 1153 (La. Ct. App. 2011). “R.S. 10:4-101 et seq., such that the failure of the plaintiff, Debbie Jo Brooks (“Brooks”), to provide notice of unauthorized signatures on certain checks precludes her claim against Pershing to recover funds wrongly withdrawn from her brokerage account by her former partner,…”
Com. Bank & Trust Co. v. Bank of Louisiana, 487 So. 2d 655 (La. Ct. App. 1986). “It can be argued that these transactions fit within the Louisiana Commercial Laws, specifically LSA-R.S. 10:4-101, et seq. (entitled Bank Deposits and Collections).”
Am. Turbine Tech., Inc. v. Omni Bancshares, Inc., 222 So. 3d 189 (La. Ct. App. 2017). “R.S. 10:4-101, et seq.) of the Louisiana UCC.”
N. Frac Proppants, LLC v. Regions Bank, NA (M.D. La. 2022). · cites it 2× “R.S. § 10:4-101, et seq. “LUCC”), or, alternatively, the 30-day limitations period provided by the Deposit Agreement; (2) Plaintiffs’ negligence claims are likewise time-barred under the UCC, or the one-year prescriptive period set forth at La.”
State, Dep't of Culture, Rec. & Tourism v. City Nat'l Bank, 653 So. 2d 828 (La. Ct. App. 1995). “LSA-R.S. 10:4-101 et seq. CNB’s actions in honoring the checks without the endorsement of the payee served as the basis for Dyson’s embezzlement scheme.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.