Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CHAPTER 30. CONTEMPT

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 176 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1952–2025 · leading case: Fink v. Bryant, 801 So. 2d 346 (La. 2001).
Fink v. Bryant, 801 So. 2d 346 (La. 2001). · cites it 5× “§ 13:4611 regulate contempt procedure in civil cases.”
City of Kenner v. Jumonville, 701 So. 2d 223 (La. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 12× “221-227 and LSA-R.S. 13:4611. LSA-C.C.P. art. 224 provides in pertinent part: A constructive contempt of court is any contempt other than a direct one.”
Howard v. Oden, 5 So. 3d 989 (La. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 8× “R.S. 13:4611. That statute provides, in pertinent part: Except as otherwise provided for by law: (1) The supreme court, the courts of appeal, the district courts, family courts, juvenile courts and the city courts may punish a person adjudged guilty of a contempt of court…”
Boudreaux v. Vankerkhove, 993 So. 2d 725 (La. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “R.S. 13:4611. La. C.C.P. art. 227. According to La.”
In Reference to the Interdiction of Jones, 54 So. 3d 54 (La. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “The punishment which a court may impose upon a person adjudged guilty of contempt of court is provided in R.S.13:4611.” La.C.C.P. art. 227. The appellants were found in contempt for the willful disobedience of a court order, which constitutes constructive contempt of court.”
Dazet Mortg. Solutions LLC v. Faia, 116 So. 3d 711 (La. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 6× “R.S. 13:4611 permits only a maximum fine of $500.”
Rogers v. Dickens, 959 So. 2d 940 (La. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “R.S. 13:4611. STANDARD OF REVIEW A trial court is vested with great discretion in determining whether a party should be held in contempt, and its decision will only be reversed when the appellate court discerns an abuse of that discretion.”
In Re Succession of Horrell, 993 So. 2d 354 (La. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 5× “Horrell alleges that the trial court erred in that the trial court does not have the authority to order payments to attorneys or litigants in lieu of a contempt fine.”
Fontana v. Fontana, 426 So. 2d 351 (La. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 5× “Fontana was "found to be in willful contempt for violating orders of this Court in refusing to pay child support and alimony, refusing to maintain his wife in possession of the family car, and refusing to return the minor child following visitations on February 21 and again on…”
Brunet v. Magnolia Quarterboats, Inc., 711 So. 2d 308 (La. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “R.S.13:4611. La. C.C.P. art. 224 provides in pertinent part: A constructive contempt of court is any contempt other than a direct one.”
Leger v. Leger, 808 So. 2d 632 (La. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “The punishment a court may impose upon a person adjudged guilty of contempt of court is provided in LSA-R.S. 13:4611. The penalty which may be imposed for contempt of court for disobeying an order for the payment of child support or spousal support is a fine of not more than…”
City of Baton Rouge v. Douglas, 218 So. 3d 158 (La. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Douglas’s claim that the City/Parish has willfully disobeyed the April 30, 2010 “constructive contempt” order of the trial court, we note that the April 30, 2010 order solely granted his motion to strike a memorandum in opposition filed by the City /Parish in response to his…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1) — 1 case
City of Baton Rouge v. Douglas, 218 So. 3d 158 (La. Ct. App. 2017). “Douglas’s claim that the City/Parish has willfully disobeyed the April 30, 2010 “constructive contempt” order of the trial court, we note that the April 30, 2010 order solely granted his motion to strike a memorandum in opposition filed by the City /Parish in response to his…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(a) — 2 cases
Johnson & Placke v. Norris, 874 So. 2d 340 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
Cormier v. Roberson, 691 So. 2d 807 (La. Ct. App. 1997).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(b) — 4 cases
Arrington v. Arrington, 930 So. 2d 1068 (La. Ct. App. 2006).
Geo-je's Civic Ass'n Inc. v. Reed, 525 So. 2d 192 (La. Ct. App. 1988).
Long v. Hutchins, 926 So. 2d 556 (La. Ct. App. 2006).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(c) — 7 cases
City of Kenner v. Jumonville, 701 So. 2d 223 (La. Ct. App. 1997). “221-227 and LSA-R.S. 13:4611. LSA-C.C.P. art. 224 provides in pertinent part: A constructive contempt of court is any contempt other than a direct one.”
Davis v. Davis, 997 So. 2d 149 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
Johnson & Placke v. Norris, 874 So. 2d 340 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
Brown v. Taylor, 728 So. 2d 1058 (La. Ct. App. 1999).
Lutke v. Lutke, 750 So. 2d 512 (La. Ct. App. 2000).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(d) — 24 cases
Fink v. Bryant, 801 So. 2d 346 (La. 2001). “§ 13:4611 regulate contempt procedure in civil cases.”
Rogers v. Dickens, 959 So. 2d 940 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “R.S. 13:4611. STANDARD OF REVIEW A trial court is vested with great discretion in determining whether a party should be held in contempt, and its decision will only be reversed when the appellate court discerns an abuse of that discretion.”
Boudreaux v. Vankerkhove, 993 So. 2d 725 (La. Ct. App. 2008). “R.S. 13:4611. La. C.C.P. art. 227. According to La.”
Leger v. Leger, 808 So. 2d 632 (La. Ct. App. 2001). “The punishment a court may impose upon a person adjudged guilty of contempt of court is provided in LSA-R.S. 13:4611. The penalty which may be imposed for contempt of court for disobeying an order for the payment of child support or spousal support is a fine of not more than…”
Davis v. Davis, 997 So. 2d 149 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(d)(i) — 6 cases
Tiffany Nielsen v. Nakia Nielsen (La. Ct. App. 2023).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(e) — 1 case
Blair v. Knight, 977 So. 2d 303 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(e)(iv) — 3 cases
Spring v. Edwards, 25 So. 3d 247 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Jackel Int'l Ltd., 269 So. 3d 1136 (La. Ct. App. 2019).
Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Jackel Int'l Ltd., 269 So. 3d 1136 (La. Ct. App. 2019).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(f) — 1 case
Howard v. Oden, 5 So. 3d 989 (La. Ct. App. 2009). “R.S. 13:4611. That statute provides, in pertinent part: Except as otherwise provided for by law: (1) The supreme court, the courts of appeal, the district courts, family courts, juvenile courts and the city courts may punish a person adjudged guilty of a contempt of court…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(1)(g) — 5 cases
Camalo v. Estrada, 257 So. 3d 202 (La. Ct. App. 2018).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(2) — 1 case
Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Bd. v. Johnson, 372 So. 2d 585 (La. Ct. App. 1979).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(3) — 4 cases
In re T.S., 32 So. 3d 1026 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
In Re Ts, 32 So. 3d 1026 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
Louisiana State Bd. of Med. Examiners v. Doty, 258 So. 2d 639 (La. Ct. App. 1972).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(4) — 1 case
Rosselli v. Rosselli, 352 So. 2d 370 (La. Ct. App. 1977).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(A) — 6 cases
Riley v. Pennix, 442 So. 2d 563 (La. Ct. App. 1983).
Graval v. Graval, 355 So. 2d 1057 (La. Ct. App. 1978).
Wall v. Wall, 230 So. 2d 420 (La. Ct. App. 1969).
Ourso v. Ourso, 282 So. 2d 157 (La. Ct. App. 1973).
Wollman v. GRAVAL, 355 So. 2d 1057 (La. Ct. App. 1978).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(A)(2) — 2 cases
Branstetter v. Purohit, 958 So. 2d 740 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
Martin v. Martin, 469 So. 2d 1108 (La. Ct. App. 1985).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(A)(4) — 5 cases
State v. Austin, 374 So. 2d 1252 (La. 1979).
Fontana v. Fontana, 426 So. 2d 351 (La. Ct. App. 1983). “Fontana was "found to be in willful contempt for violating orders of this Court in refusing to pay child support and alimony, refusing to maintain his wife in possession of the family car, and refusing to return the minor child following visitations on February 21 and again on…”
Dove v. Dove, 386 So. 2d 127 (La. Ct. App. 1980).
Debetaz v. Debetaz, 421 So. 2d 379 (La. Ct. App. 1982).
Bell v. Bell, 386 So. 2d 1096 (La. Ct. App. 1980).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(D) — 1 case
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(D)(i) — 1 case
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(c) — 1 case
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(d) — 6 cases
Soileau v. Smith's True Value & Rental, 40 So. 3d 379 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
George v. Nero, 839 So. 2d 1085 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
Kopnicky v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 215 So. 3d 746 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
Allen v. Allen, 132 So. 3d 380 (La. 2013).
Allen v. Martin, 127 So. 3d 907 (La. 2013).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(d)(e) — 1 case
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 953 So. 2d 115 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(d)(i) — 1 case
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(g) — 1 case
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(b) — 1 case
Yokum v. Nicholas S. Karno II, Inc., 126 So. 3d 723 (La. Ct. App. 2013).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(c) — 1 case
Kairdolf v. Kairdolf, 58 So. 3d 527 (La. Ct. App. 2011).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(d) — 15 cases
Jaligam v. Pochampally, 162 So. 3d 464 (La. Ct. App. 2015).
In Reference to the Interdiction of Jones, 54 So. 3d 54 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “The punishment which a court may impose upon a person adjudged guilty of contempt of court is provided in R.S.13:4611.” La.C.C.P. art. 227. The appellants were found in contempt for the willful disobedience of a court order, which constitutes constructive contempt of court.”
Howard v. Oden, 5 So. 3d 989 (La. Ct. App. 2009). “R.S. 13:4611. That statute provides, in pertinent part: Except as otherwise provided for by law: (1) The supreme court, the courts of appeal, the district courts, family courts, juvenile courts and the city courts may punish a person adjudged guilty of a contempt of court…”
Lockett v. UV Ins. Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 180 So. 3d 557 (La. Ct. App. 2015).
Garcia v. Garcia, 49 So. 3d 601 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(d)(i) — 2 cases
Rockett v. Rockett, 223 So. 3d 1227 (La. Ct. App. 2017).
Allen v. Allen, 171 So. 3d 922 (La. 2015).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(e) — 1 case
Morris v. Morris, 889 So. 2d 1048 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(e)(i) — 1 case
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 953 So. 2d 115 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(e)(iii) — 1 case
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 953 So. 2d 115 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(e)(iv) — 2 cases
Smith v. Pillow-Smith, 52 So. 3d 264 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(f) — 2 cases
Howard v. Oden, 5 So. 3d 989 (La. Ct. App. 2009). “R.S. 13:4611. That statute provides, in pertinent part: Except as otherwise provided for by law: (1) The supreme court, the courts of appeal, the district courts, family courts, juvenile courts and the city courts may punish a person adjudged guilty of a contempt of court…”
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 953 So. 2d 115 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4611(l)(g) — 1 case
Lepine v. Lepine, 223 So. 3d 666 (La. Ct. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.