Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
LA-LEGlegis.la.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§3881. General exemptions from seizure
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 143
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1961–2024 · leading case: In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996).
In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881.” The Court took the matter under advisement for purposes of trying to figure out the answer and, if such could be accomplished, to so advise the parties to this proceeding and the other trustees within this district.”
In Re Black, 225 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1998). “00, as being exempt, pursuant to R.S. § 13:3881. J.D.’s timely filed a proof of claim asserting an unsecured claim in the amount of $12,628.”
Mexic v. Mexic, 808 So. 2d 685 (La. Ct. App. 2001). “R.S. 13:3881 and La. R.S. 20:33 as said statutes were worded on the date of seizure, December 11, 1998 and/or as said statutes were amended by virtue of Act 63 of 1999.”
In Re Ballard, 238 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1999). “” 80 On appeal the state circuit court characterizes the debtors’ contention to be “that said rental payment[s] constitute earnings which are 75% exempt from seizure pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:3881.” 81 The court found “this argument to be without merit.”
In re Burns, 482 B.R. 164 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2012). “R.S. § 13:3881. Trustee argues that the proceeds of the lawsuit are not wages, but simply the products of an incorporeal right not exempt under Louisiana law.”
In Re White, 352 B.R. 633 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006). “R.S. § 13:3881 and therefore is not a vehicle for personal use.”
In Re Romano, 350 B.R. 276 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2005). “Both vehicles are claimed as exempt under the provisions of La.Rev.Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2), which exempts property necessary to the trade, calling or professions of the debtor.”
Aetna Fin. Co. v. Antoine, 343 So. 2d 1195 (La. Ct. App. 1977). “The Antoines seek to arrest the sale of seized pieces of household furnishings which are exempt under LSA-R.S. 13:3881. [1] The debtors contend that the statutory exemption covering the seized household property [2] has not been waived by the granting of the chattel mortgage.”
Matter of Mmahat, 110 B.R. 236 (Bankr. E.D. La. 1990). “R.S. 13:3881 by claiming as exempt the contents of several living rooms and more bedrooms than necessary for use by family members.”
Welltech, Inc. v. Abadie, 683 So. 2d 809 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881(D). [1] *810 The facts of this case are as follows: WellTech, Inc.”
WT Grant Co. v. Mitchell, 269 So. 2d 186 (La. 1972). “R.S. 13:3881. [1] This enactment is found within Title 13 ("Courts and Judicial Procedures") of the Louisiana Revised Statutes.”
In re Everett, 520 B.R. 498 (E.D. La. 2014). “La.Rev.Stat. § 13:3881 (D)(2)-(3). . See In re Taylor, No.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(0) — 1 case
Southard v. Belnue, Inc., 618 So. 2d 27 (La. Ct. App. 1993).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(1) — 3 cases
Am. Fin. Corp. of Coushatta, Inc. v. Small, 250 So. 2d 768 (La. Ct. App. 1971).
Excel Baronne Disc., Inc. v. Montana, 279 So. 2d 229 (La. Ct. App. 1973).
Natchitoches Collections, Inc. v. Gorum, 274 So. 2d 449 (La. Ct. App. 1973).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(2) — 8 cases
In the Matter of Robert Henry Allen, Jr., & Mary Lou Allen, Debtors. Robert Henry Allen, Jr., & Mary Lou Allen v. Hale Cnty. State Bank, 725 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1984).
In Re Evans, 25 B.R. 105 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982).
In Re Babcock, 9 B.R. 475 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1981).
WT Grant Co. v. Mitchell, 269 So. 2d 186 (La. 1972). “R.S. 13:3881. [1] This enactment is found within Title 13 ("Courts and Judicial Procedures") of the Louisiana Revised Statutes.”
Cox v. Smith, 275 So. 2d 459 (La. Ct. App. 1973).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(4) — 2 cases
In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881.” The Court took the matter under advisement for purposes of trying to figure out the answer and, if such could be accomplished, to so advise the parties to this proceeding and the other trustees within this district.”
Ideal Loan of New Orleans, Inc. v. Johnson, 218 So. 2d 634 (La. Ct. App. 1969).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A) — 6 cases
In Re Ballard, 238 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1999). “” 80 On appeal the state circuit court characterizes the debtors’ contention to be “that said rental payment[s] constitute earnings which are 75% exempt from seizure pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:3881.” 81 The court found “this argument to be without merit.”
In Re Hendrick, 45 B.R. 965 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1985).
McClanahan v. Kimball (In Re Kimball), 2 B.R. 560 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1980).
Chashoudian v. Pate, 17 So. 3d 49 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Manso, 348 B.R. 74 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2005).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(1) — 2 cases
In Re Ballard, 238 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1999). “” 80 On appeal the state circuit court characterizes the debtors’ contention to be “that said rental payment[s] constitute earnings which are 75% exempt from seizure pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:3881.” 81 The court found “this argument to be without merit.”
Employers Mut. Cas. Co. v. Joseph T. Lofton & Natasha Starks Reversed; Reversed; Vacated; Remanded. Marcotte, J., concurs with reasons set forth by J. Ellender. (La. Ct. App. 2024).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2) — 12 cases
In Re Romano, 350 B.R. 276 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2005). “Both vehicles are claimed as exempt under the provisions of La.Rev.Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2), which exempts property necessary to the trade, calling or professions of the debtor.”
Lightfoot v. Landry (In Re Landry), 350 B.R. 51 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006).
In Re Racca, 40 B.R. 622 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1984).
Matter of Mmahat, 110 B.R. 236 (Bankr. E.D. La. 1990). “R.S. 13:3881 by claiming as exempt the contents of several living rooms and more bedrooms than necessary for use by family members.”
In Re Baker, 71 B.R. 312 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1987).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2)(a) — 5 cases
In Re Romano, 350 B.R. 276 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2005). “Both vehicles are claimed as exempt under the provisions of La.Rev.Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2), which exempts property necessary to the trade, calling or professions of the debtor.”
In Re Zimmel, 185 B.R. 786 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995).
In Re Ehlen, 202 B.R. 742 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1996).
In Re Vicknair, 315 B.R. 822 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2004).
In Re Savoie, 351 B.R. 392 (Bankr. W.D. La. 2006).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2)(d) — 5 cases
In Re Romano, 350 B.R. 276 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2005). “Both vehicles are claimed as exempt under the provisions of La.Rev.Stat. § 13:3881(A)(2), which exempts property necessary to the trade, calling or professions of the debtor.”
In Re Black, 225 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1998). “00, as being exempt, pursuant to R.S. § 13:3881. J.D.’s timely filed a proof of claim asserting an unsecured claim in the amount of $12,628.”
In Re Manso, 348 B.R. 74 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2005).
In Re Savoie, 351 B.R. 392 (Bankr. W.D. La. 2006).
Wilson v. Bryan, 734 So. 2d 1214 (La. 1999).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(4)(a) — 3 cases
Matter of Mmahat, 110 B.R. 236 (Bankr. E.D. La. 1990). “R.S. 13:3881 by claiming as exempt the contents of several living rooms and more bedrooms than necessary for use by family members.”
In Re Ballard, 238 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1999). “” 80 On appeal the state circuit court characterizes the debtors’ contention to be “that said rental payment[s] constitute earnings which are 75% exempt from seizure pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:3881.” 81 The court found “this argument to be without merit.”
In Re Baker, 71 B.R. 312 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1987).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(4)(c) — 1 case
In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881.” The Court took the matter under advisement for purposes of trying to figure out the answer and, if such could be accomplished, to so advise the parties to this proceeding and the other trustees within this district.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(4)(e) — 3 cases
In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881.” The Court took the matter under advisement for purposes of trying to figure out the answer and, if such could be accomplished, to so advise the parties to this proceeding and the other trustees within this district.”
In the Matter Of: Horace E. Wilson Alyne Dale Wilson, Debtors. Horace E. Wilson Alyne Dale Wilson v. Brent Bryan Jennifer Bryan Barber, 162 F.3d 378 (5th Cir. 1998).
Wilson v. Bryan, 734 So. 2d 1214 (La. 1999).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(4)(f) — 1 case
Chashoudian v. Pate, 17 So. 3d 49 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(5) — 1 case
In Re Robinson, 352 B.R. 436 (Bankr. W.D. La. 2006).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(6) — 2 cases
Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray), 506 B.R. 129 (10th Cir. BAP 2014).
Bianca Ann Medina (Bankr. D.N.M. 2022).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(7) — 2 cases
In re Gilica, 530 B.R. 429 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2015).
Sikes v. Samuel, 559 B.R. 135 (W.D. La. 2016).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(8) — 1 case
In re Gilica, 530 B.R. 429 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2015).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(l)(a) — 2 cases
In re Burns, 482 B.R. 164 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2012). “R.S. § 13:3881. Trustee argues that the proceeds of the lawsuit are not wages, but simply the products of an incorporeal right not exempt under Louisiana law.”
De La Vergne v. De La Vergne, 662 So. 2d 32 (La. Ct. App. 1995).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(A)(l)(b) — 1 case
De La Vergne v. De La Vergne, 662 So. 2d 32 (La. Ct. App. 1995).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(B) — 7 cases
In the Matter of James A. Maddox, Debtors. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc. v. James A. Maddox, Jr., & Harold J. Barkley, Jr., Tr., 15 F.3d 1347 (5th Cir. 1994).
In Re Hendrick, 45 B.R. 965 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1985).
Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,927, 10 tex.bankr.ct.rep. 199 in the Matter of Ronald Wischan, Debtor. Ronald Wischan v. David v. Adler, in the Matter of Philip De Nicola, Debtor. Philip De Nicola v. David v. Adler, 77 F.3d 875 (5th Cir. 1996).
Trowbridge v. Fascio, 718 So. 2d 1025 (La. Ct. App. 1998).
Wischan v. Adler (In re Wischan), 77 F.3d 875 (5th Cir. 1996).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(B)(1) — 11 cases
Matter of Young, 64 B.R. 611 (E.D. La. 1986).
Martin Sheehan v. Keith Ash, 889 F.3d 171 (4th Cir. 2018).
In Re Black, 225 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1998). “00, as being exempt, pursuant to R.S. § 13:3881. J.D.’s timely filed a proof of claim asserting an unsecured claim in the amount of $12,628.”
In Re McCollum, 363 B.R. 789 (E.D. La. 2007).
In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881.” The Court took the matter under advisement for purposes of trying to figure out the answer and, if such could be accomplished, to so advise the parties to this proceeding and the other trustees within this district.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(D) — 14 cases
Welltech, Inc. v. Abadie, 683 So. 2d 809 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881(D). [1] *810 The facts of this case are as follows: WellTech, Inc.”
Loftice v. Loftice, 985 So. 2d 204 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
In re Everett, 520 B.R. 498 (E.D. La. 2014). “La.Rev.Stat. § 13:3881 (D)(2)-(3). . See In re Taylor, No.”
Mexic v. Mexic, 808 So. 2d 685 (La. Ct. App. 2001). “R.S. 13:3881 and La. R.S. 20:33 as said statutes were worded on the date of seizure, December 11, 1998 and/or as said statutes were amended by virtue of Act 63 of 1999.”
In Re Orso, 219 B.R. 402 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1998).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(D)(1) — 13 cases
In Re: Orso, 283 F.3d 686 (5th Cir. 2000).
Cashio v. Tollin, 686 So. 2d 1066 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
Canfield v. Orso, 214 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2000).
WellTech, Inc. v. Abadie, 666 So. 2d 1237 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
Loftice v. Loftice, 985 So. 2d 204 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(D)(2) — 1 case
In Re Clement, 327 B.R. 249 (Bankr. M.D. La. 2005).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(D)(3) — 2 cases
Mexic v. Mexic, 808 So. 2d 685 (La. Ct. App. 2001). “R.S. 13:3881 and La. R.S. 20:33 as said statutes were worded on the date of seizure, December 11, 1998 and/or as said statutes were amended by virtue of Act 63 of 1999.”
In Re Clement, 327 B.R. 249 (Bankr. M.D. La. 2005).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(a)(2) — 1 case
In Re Brown, 189 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1996). “R.S. 13:3881.” The Court took the matter under advisement for purposes of trying to figure out the answer and, if such could be accomplished, to so advise the parties to this proceeding and the other trustees within this district.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(d)(1) — 1 case
Cashio v. Tollin, 712 So. 2d 254 (La. Ct. App. 1998).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3881(l)(a) — 1 case
Sinclair v. Hodge, 417 F.3d 527 (5th Cir. 2005).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.