La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§1944. Local education agency; responsibilities

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1971–2003 · leading case: Helms Ex Rel. Helms v. Cody, 856 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. La. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Helms Ex Rel. Helms v. Cody, 856 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. La. 1994). · cites it 24× “Plaintiffs have also asked this Court to decide whether the Louisiana statutory provisions, specifically La.Rev.Stat. §§ 17:1944, 17:1946, 17:1949, and 17:1950, authorizing the funding of special education programs on the premises of pervasively sectarian institutions are…”
White Ex Rel. White v. Ascension Par. Sch. Bd., 343 F.3d 373 (5th Cir. 2003). “The Whites point to provisions similar to those contained in the IDEA and its regulations, especially: (1) La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(B)(14), add. 4, which requires “placement” of disabled children in the school nearest their place of residence, if placement is appropriate; (2) La.”
State in Interest of Ss, 499 So. 2d 1198 (La. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “17:1945 and is defined in the regulations developed pursuant to R.S. 17:1944 as being mentally handicapped, gifted and talented, hard of hearing, deaf, speech impaired, severe language disordered, visually handicapped, emotionally disturbed, orthopedically handicapped,…”
Foster v. Bd. of Elementary & Secondary Educ., 479 So. 2d 489 (La. Ct. App. 1985). “' and by R.S. 17:1944 in the Chapter entitled `Education of Exceptional Children' which reads in pertinent part, `A.”
Slusser v. Credeur, 252 So. 2d 688 (La. Ct. App. 1971). “* * *” (LSA-R.S. 17:1944) Emphasis supplied. “When for any reason it is not feasible for parish or city school boards to establish public classes for (the) special education * * * then the State Department of Education is authorized to pay tuition costs in approved private…”
Durham v. State ex rel. Dep't of Educ., 638 So. 2d 1129 (La. Ct. App. 1994). “So, when read with the statutes cited above, it is also clear that LSA-R.S. 17:1944(B)(6), which states: “B.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(A)(1) — 1 case
Helms Ex Rel. Helms v. Cody, 856 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. La. 1994). “Plaintiffs have also asked this Court to decide whether the Louisiana statutory provisions, specifically La.Rev.Stat. §§ 17:1944, 17:1946, 17:1949, and 17:1950, authorizing the funding of special education programs on the premises of pervasively sectarian institutions are…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(A)(2) — 1 case
Helms Ex Rel. Helms v. Cody, 856 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. La. 1994). “Plaintiffs have also asked this Court to decide whether the Louisiana statutory provisions, specifically La.Rev.Stat. §§ 17:1944, 17:1946, 17:1949, and 17:1950, authorizing the funding of special education programs on the premises of pervasively sectarian institutions are…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(B)(13) — 1 case
Helms Ex Rel. Helms v. Cody, 856 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. La. 1994). “Plaintiffs have also asked this Court to decide whether the Louisiana statutory provisions, specifically La.Rev.Stat. §§ 17:1944, 17:1946, 17:1949, and 17:1950, authorizing the funding of special education programs on the premises of pervasively sectarian institutions are…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(B)(14) — 1 case
White Ex Rel. White v. Ascension Par. Sch. Bd., 343 F.3d 373 (5th Cir. 2003). “The Whites point to provisions similar to those contained in the IDEA and its regulations, especially: (1) La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(B)(14), add. 4, which requires “placement” of disabled children in the school nearest their place of residence, if placement is appropriate; (2) La.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 17:1944(B)(6) — 1 case
Durham v. State ex rel. Dep't of Educ., 638 So. 2d 1129 (La. Ct. App. 1994). “So, when read with the statutes cited above, it is also clear that LSA-R.S. 17:1944(B)(6), which states: “B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.