Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 30:6 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§6. Hearings; notice; rules of procedure; emergency; service of process; public records; request for hearings; orders and compliance orders

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1958–2019 · leading case: Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 48 So. 3d 234 (La. 2010).
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 48 So. 3d 234 (La. 2010). · cites it 2× “R.S. 30:6(F); La. R.S. 30:16. [19] Likewise, in Broussard v.”
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor, 644 So. 2d 191 (La. 1994). · cites it 4× “R.S. 30:6(B) provides, in pertinent part, that "[t]he commissioner, in his discretion, may designate a member of his staff to conduct public hearings on his behalf," there is no merit to plaintiffs' assertions that the Commissioner's factual findings in the orders which resulted…”
Wagoner v. Chevron USA Inc., 55 So. 3d 12 (La. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “R.S. 30:6(F); La. R.S. 30:16. (Emphasis theirs).”
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 79 So. 3d 246 (La. 2011). · cites it 2× “R.S. 30:6(F) (interested persons have the right to have the commissioner of conservation call a hearing for the purpose of taking action); La.”
S. Nat. Gas Co. v. Poland, 406 So. 2d 657 (La. Ct. App. 1981). “LRS 30:6(F). An interested person affected by an order of the Commissioner may obtain judicial and summary review of the Commissioner's order by filing suit at the Commissioner's domicile in East Baton Rouge Parish.”
Mills v. Davis Oil Co., 11 F.3d 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3× “R.S. 30:6. Hearings; notice; rules of procedures; emergency; service of process; public records; request for hearings; orders and compliance orders A.”
Simmons v. Pure Oil Co., 124 So. 2d 161 (La. Ct. App. 1961). “* * *" LSA-R.S. 30:6, subd. E (Supp.1959).”
Jordan v. Sutton, 411 So. 2d 1170 (La. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “49:959(A) is not controlling in this case, and relies on LSA-R.S. 30:6 which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: “Any interested person has the right to have the commissioner call a hearing for the purpose of taking action in respect to a matter within the jurisdiction of…”
Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 290 F. Supp. 408 (E.D. La. 1968). “LSA-R.S. 30:6, subd. F. 45 . Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.”
Mid-Louisiana Gas Co. v. Sanchez, 280 So. 2d 406 (La. Ct. App. 1973). “30:6, shall have found: "(1) That the underground reservoir sought to be used for the injection, storage and withdrawal of natural gas is suitable and feasible for such use; provided no reservoir, any part of which is producing or is capable of producing oil in paying…”
Breaux v. Apache Oil Corp., 240 So. 2d 589 (La. Ct. App. 1970). “Plaintiffs next contend that the amended order by the Department of Conservation, changing the location of the unit well, is invalid since it violates the requirement of LSA-R.S. 30:6(B) for "a public hearing upon at least ten days notice.”
Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil Co., 561 So. 2d 732 (La. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “In the meantime, at Phillips' request, the Commissioner of Conservation, pursuant to R.S. 30:6(F), called a public hearing for Monday, June 15, 1987, to consider whether the well was properly plugged and abandoned in 1982-83, whether the pits and well site were properly cleaned…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:6(B) — 2 cases
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor, 644 So. 2d 191 (La. 1994). “R.S. 30:6(B) provides, in pertinent part, that "[t]he commissioner, in his discretion, may designate a member of his staff to conduct public hearings on his behalf," there is no merit to plaintiffs' assertions that the Commissioner's factual findings in the orders which resulted…”
Breaux v. Apache Oil Corp., 240 So. 2d 589 (La. Ct. App. 1970). “Plaintiffs next contend that the amended order by the Department of Conservation, changing the location of the unit well, is invalid since it violates the requirement of LSA-R.S. 30:6(B) for "a public hearing upon at least ten days notice.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:6(F) — 11 cases
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 48 So. 3d 234 (La. 2010). “R.S. 30:6(F); La. R.S. 30:16. [19] Likewise, in Broussard v.”
Wagoner v. Chevron USA Inc., 55 So. 3d 12 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “R.S. 30:6(F); La. R.S. 30:16. (Emphasis theirs).”
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor, 644 So. 2d 191 (La. 1994). “R.S. 30:6(B) provides, in pertinent part, that "[t]he commissioner, in his discretion, may designate a member of his staff to conduct public hearings on his behalf," there is no merit to plaintiffs' assertions that the Commissioner's factual findings in the orders which resulted…”
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 79 So. 3d 246 (La. 2011). “R.S. 30:6(F) (interested persons have the right to have the commissioner of conservation call a hearing for the purpose of taking action); La.”
S. Nat. Gas Co. v. Poland, 406 So. 2d 657 (La. Ct. App. 1981). “LRS 30:6(F). An interested person affected by an order of the Commissioner may obtain judicial and summary review of the Commissioner's order by filing suit at the Commissioner's domicile in East Baton Rouge Parish.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:6(G) — 2 cases
Mills v. Davis Oil Co., 11 F.3d 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). “R.S. 30:6. Hearings; notice; rules of procedures; emergency; service of process; public records; request for hearings; orders and compliance orders A.”
Mills, III v. Davis Oil Co., 11 F.3d 1298 (5th Cir. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.