Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes
La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
LA-LEGlegis.la.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§969. Prohibited acts - Schedule IV; penalties
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 207
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: State v. Brown, 389 So. 2d 48 (La. 1980).
State v. Brown, 389 So. 2d 48 (La. 1980). “This case presents the question whether R.S. 40:969(C) making criminal the "unknowing" as well as the intentional possession of Talwin is constitutional.”
State v. Turner, 896 So. 2d 286 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “R.S. 40:969(C), possession of marijuana in violation of La.”
State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry, 221 So. 3d 815 (La. 2017). “R.S. 40:969(B)(2); and one count of conspiracy to commit simple escape, a violation of La.”
State v. Kerlec, 957 So. 2d 810 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “R.S. 40:969(C). Count five charged the Defendant with possession of diazepam, a violation of La.”
State v. Brady, 727 So. 2d 1264 (La. Ct. App. 1999). “R.S. 40:969(A)(1). [1] Defendants were arraigned on May 23, 1995, at which time each pleaded not guilty to all counts.”
Manrique, 21 I. & N. Dec. 58 (BIA 1995). “40:968(C), R.S. 40:969(C), R.S. 40:970(C) of this part, and when it appears that the best interests of the public and of the defendant will be served, the court may, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of such person, defer further proceedings and place him…”
State v. Parker, 871 So. 2d 317 (La. 2004). “R.S. 40:969(C). The alleged offense occurred on March 25, 1997.”
State v. Biglane, 738 So. 2d 630 (La. Ct. App. 1999). “R.S. 40:969 on December 7, 1990, and defendant's plea of guilty to a violation of La.”
State v. Manuel, 426 So. 2d 140 (La. 1983). “R.S. 40:969 A(1). On March 22, 1982, officers of the state police submitted affidavits reciting the above facts and obtained warrants to seize the 1981 GMC pickup truck and the 1976 *143 Buick.”
State v. Rapp, 161 So. 3d 103 (La. Ct. App. 2015). “R.S. 40:969 A(l). Rapp pleaded not guilty to both charges.”
State v. Goiner, 410 So. 2d 1085 (La. 1982). “R.S. 40:969 in that she did knowingly and intentionally possess a controlled dangerous substance, Talwin.”
State v. Harrell, 40 So. 3d 311 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “R.S. 40:969(C), and (6) possession of clonazepam, a violation of La.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(0) — 1 case
State v. Scott, 677 So. 2d 156 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(6) — 1 case
State v. Eiermann, 224 So. 3d 1220 (La. Ct. App. 2017).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(A) — 21 cases
State v. Hebert, 846 So. 2d 60 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Vincent, 971 So. 2d 363 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Landry, 845 So. 2d 1233 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Brown, 479 So. 2d 464 (La. Ct. App. 1985).
State v. Tate, 593 So. 2d 864 (La. Ct. App. 1992).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(A)(1) — 14 cases
State v. Brady, 727 So. 2d 1264 (La. Ct. App. 1999). “R.S. 40:969(A)(1). [1] Defendants were arraigned on May 23, 1995, at which time each pleaded not guilty to all counts.”
State v. Skinner, 191 So. 3d 676 (La. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Kimbrough, 432 So. 2d 833 (La. 1983).
State v. Ross, 207 So. 3d 511 (La. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Miller, 220 So. 3d 820 (La. Ct. App. 2017).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(A)(1)(G) — 1 case
State v. Samuel, 984 So. 2d 256 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(A)(2) — 1 case
State v. Richardson, 533 So. 2d 1316 (La. Ct. App. 1988).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(B) — 15 cases
State v. Robertson, 988 So. 2d 166 (La. 2008).
State v. Sarrio, 803 So. 2d 212 (La. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Ruiz, 931 So. 2d 472 (La. Ct. App. 2006).
State v. Guillot, 115 So. 3d 624 (La. Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Skipper, 906 So. 2d 399 (La. 2005).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(B)(2) — 6 cases
State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry, 221 So. 3d 815 (La. 2017). “R.S. 40:969(B)(2); and one count of conspiracy to commit simple escape, a violation of La.”
State v. Watson, 821 So. 2d 618 (La. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Ourso, 67 So. 3d 680 (La. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. New, 880 So. 2d 971 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry (La. 2017).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(C) — 73 cases
State v. Brown, 389 So. 2d 48 (La. 1980). “This case presents the question whether R.S. 40:969(C) making criminal the "unknowing" as well as the intentional possession of Talwin is constitutional.”
State v. Turner, 896 So. 2d 286 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “R.S. 40:969(C), possession of marijuana in violation of La.”
State v. Kerlec, 957 So. 2d 810 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “R.S. 40:969(C). Count five charged the Defendant with possession of diazepam, a violation of La.”
Manrique, 21 I. & N. Dec. 58 (BIA 1995). “40:968(C), R.S. 40:969(C), R.S. 40:970(C) of this part, and when it appears that the best interests of the public and of the defendant will be served, the court may, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of such person, defer further proceedings and place him…”
State v. Parker, 871 So. 2d 317 (La. 2004). “R.S. 40:969(C). The alleged offense occurred on March 25, 1997.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(C)(2) — 12 cases
State v. Parker, 845 So. 2d 546 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Tran, 919 So. 2d 787 (La. Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Henry, 966 So. 2d 692 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Ross, 207 So. 3d 511 (La. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Blazio, 44 So. 3d 725 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(D) — 1 case
State v. New, 880 So. 2d 971 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 40:969(E)(1) — 1 case
State v. Iovenitti, 194 So. 3d 1144 (La. Ct. App. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.