Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 46:153 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§153. Medical assistance; estate recovery program

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 85 So. 3d 39 (La. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 85 So. 3d 39 (La. 2012). · cites it 4× “R.S. 46:153(E). [12] Rather, our holding narrowly states that the PCF is not required to pay anything to DHH because DHH neither became a party to this action nor asserted its privilege against the PCF pursuant to the statutory procedure.”

Duplechain v. Jalili, 52 So. 3d 1072 (La. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “R.S. 46:153(E) provides that the Medicaid recipient "shall be deemed to have made an assignment to the department [DHH] of his right to .”

Bozeman v. State, Dep't of Transp. & Dev., 839 So. 2d 960 (La. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “R.S. 46:153. Linda Bozeman, individually and on behalf of Tommy, sued the State/DOTD (hereinafter “DOTD”).”

In Re Rezulin Prods. Liab. Litig., 524 F. Supp. 2d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). “R.S. § 46:153(B)(4)(a) (attached as Exhibit D to Grass Declaration).”

Paulsell v. State, Dep't of Transp. & Dev., 171 So. 3d 282 (La. Ct. App. 2015). “R.S. 46:153(E) and (H). Nevertheless, because La.”

Brooks v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 106 Health & Welfare Fund, 464 So. 2d 26 (La. Ct. App. 1985). “l be issued by any insurer doing business in this state which excludes payment of benefits to an insured or his assignee for services rendered by a physician, hospital, or other provider of medical services, which services are considered reimbursable in whole or in part from…”

Highland Hills Hosp. v. Louisiana, 926 F. Supp. 83 (M.D. La. 1996). “Since the defendant timely removed the suit to federal court within this new thirty day period, the plaintiffs motion to remand must be denied.”

— La. Rev. Stat. § 46:153(B)(4)(a) — 1 case

In Re Rezulin Prods. Liab. Litig., 524 F. Supp. 2d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). “R.S. § 46:153(B)(4)(a) (attached as Exhibit D to Grass Declaration).”

— La. Rev. Stat. § 46:153(E) — 4 cases

Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 85 So. 3d 39 (La. 2012). “R.S. 46:153(E). [12] Rather, our holding narrowly states that the PCF is not required to pay anything to DHH because DHH neither became a party to this action nor asserted its privilege against the PCF pursuant to the statutory procedure.”

Duplechain v. Jalili, 52 So. 3d 1072 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “R.S. 46:153(E) provides that the Medicaid recipient "shall be deemed to have made an assignment to the department [DHH] of his right to .”

Bozeman v. State, Dep't of Transp. & Dev., 839 So. 2d 960 (La. Ct. App. 2003). “R.S. 46:153. Linda Bozeman, individually and on behalf of Tommy, sued the State/DOTD (hereinafter “DOTD”).”

Paulsell v. State, Dep't of Transp. & Dev., 171 So. 3d 282 (La. Ct. App. 2015). “R.S. 46:153(E) and (H). Nevertheless, because La.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.