Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART I-A. CHILD SUPPORT

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 362 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 16× “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Martello v. Martello, 960 So. 2d 186 (La. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 7× “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A). Income means the actual gross income of a party, if the party is employed to full capacity.”

State of Louisiana, Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie, 167 So. 3d 573 (La. 2015). · cites it 8× “In addition, the child support guidelines, LSA-R.S. 9:315 et seq., apply to cases brought by the State under Title 46 (which includes the child support enforcement law, LSA-R.”

State, Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. L.T., 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006). · cites it 17× “The trial court found that this falls within the ambit of LSA-R.S. 9:315, which provides that gross income does not encompass per diem allowances, which are also not subject to federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code.”

Dejoie v. Guidry, 71 So. 3d 1111 (La. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 8× “R.S. 9:315 C(3)(a). Also, “gross income” includes significant in-kind payments from self-employment which reduce the parent’s personal living expenses as well as a parent’s closely held corporation’s gross receipts “minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce…”

Campbell v. Campbell, 682 So. 2d 312 (La. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 8× “See LSA-R.S. 9:315(1). [3] Although Womack was not employed at the time of this proceeding, her monthly income was stipulated to be $1,060.”

Molony v. Harris, 51 So. 3d 752 (La. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 7× “9:315(C)(3)(d)(i), which specifies that the determination of a parent’s gross income should not include child support received for purposes of determining that parent’s child support obligation.”

Widman v. Widman, 619 So. 2d 632 (La. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 9× “LSA-R.S. 9:315(4) defining "gross income," states as follows: (4) "Gross income" means: (a) The income from any source, including but not limited to salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, dividends, severance pay, pensions, interest, trust income, annuities, capital gains,…”

Shaw v. Shaw, 714 So. 2d 906 (La. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “R.S. 9:315(4)(b). Likewise, Renee's ability to receive half-price meals while in uniform does not qualify under La.”

Romanowski v. Romanowski, 873 So. 2d 656 (La. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A); see LSA-C.C. art. 141.”

State v. Flintroy, 599 So. 2d 331 (La. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 6× “However, because the trial court failed to properly follow the statutory guidelines for the determination of child support found in LSA-R.S. 9:315 et seq., and failed to give reasons for deviation from the guidelines, we amend the judgment to apply the guidelines.”

Norred v. Norred, 591 So. 2d 396 (La. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 7× “On December 5, 1990, this court reversed the part of the judgment increasing child support because of the trial court's failure to follow the statutory guidelines set forth in LSA-R.S. 9:315, et seq., and affirmed that part of the judgment which modified custody during holidays.”

Show all 362 citing cases →

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(0)(5)(5) — 1 case

Brossett v. Brossett, 195 So. 3d 471 (La. Ct. App. 2015).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(1) — 12 cases

Holdsworth v. Holdsworth, 621 So. 2d 71 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Caro v. Caro, 671 So. 2d 516 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

Campbell v. Campbell, 682 So. 2d 312 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “See LSA-R.S. 9:315(1). [3] Although Womack was not employed at the time of this proceeding, her monthly income was stipulated to be $1,060.”

Corley v. Corley, 600 So. 2d 908 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Timmons v. Timmons, 605 So. 2d 1162 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(3) — 8 cases

Zatzkis v. Zatzkis, 632 So. 2d 307 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

McDaniel v. McDaniel, 670 So. 2d 767 (La. Ct. App. 1996).

Trahan v. Panagiotis, 654 So. 2d 398 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

Authement v. Authement, 694 So. 2d 1129 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Satterfield v. Alline, 805 So. 2d 309 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4) — 17 cases

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Baggett v. Baggett, 693 So. 2d 264 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Thomey v. Thomey, 756 So. 2d 698 (La. Ct. App. 2000).

Sawyer v. Sawyer, 799 So. 2d 1226 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(C) — 1 case

Baggett v. Baggett, 693 So. 2d 264 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(a) — 16 cases

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Patrick v. Patrick, 785 So. 2d 169 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

Green v. Scott, 687 So. 2d 655 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Sporl v. Sporl, 788 So. 2d 682 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

Zatzkis v. Zatzkis, 632 So. 2d 307 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(b) — 5 cases

Shaw v. Shaw, 714 So. 2d 906 (La. Ct. App. 1998). “R.S. 9:315(4)(b). Likewise, Renee's ability to receive half-price meals while in uniform does not qualify under La.”

Widman v. Widman, 619 So. 2d 632 (La. Ct. App. 1993). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(4) defining "gross income," states as follows: (4) "Gross income" means: (a) The income from any source, including but not limited to salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, dividends, severance pay, pensions, interest, trust income, annuities, capital gains,…”

Norris v. Norris, 604 So. 2d 107 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

McDaniel v. McDaniel, 670 So. 2d 767 (La. Ct. App. 1996).

Templeton v. Templeton, 774 So. 2d 1257 (La. Ct. App. 2000).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(c) — 11 cases

Mayo v. Crazovich, 621 So. 2d 120 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Riggs v. LaJaunie, 720 So. 2d 114 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

State v. Reed, 658 So. 2d 774 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(d) — 3 cases

Guy v. Guy, 600 So. 2d 771 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Green v. Scott, 687 So. 2d 655 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Naquin v. Naquin, 610 So. 2d 981 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(d)(i) — 1 case

Sobers v. Sobers, 724 So. 2d 278 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(d)(iii) — 5 cases

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Montou v. Montou, 692 So. 2d 705 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Bullock v. Bullock, 719 So. 2d 113 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

Douthit v. Douthit, 732 So. 2d 616 (La. Ct. App. 1999).

State ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Toledano, 713 So. 2d 679 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(4)(e) — 1 case

Hosch v. Hosch, 684 So. 2d 541 (La. Ct. App. 1996).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(5) — 7 cases

Shaw v. Shaw, 714 So. 2d 906 (La. Ct. App. 1998). “R.S. 9:315(4)(b). Likewise, Renee's ability to receive half-price meals while in uniform does not qualify under La.”

State v. Reed, 658 So. 2d 774 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

Timmons v. Timmons, 605 So. 2d 1162 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Lutke v. Lutke, 750 So. 2d 512 (La. Ct. App. 2000).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(5)(b) — 1 case

Philip Joseph Triche, Jr. Versus Danielle Demarco Triche (La. Ct. App. 2025).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(6) — 17 cases

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Savage v. Savage, 821 So. 2d 603 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Holdsworth v. Holdsworth, 621 So. 2d 71 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Guy v. Guy, 600 So. 2d 771 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(6)(a) — 3 cases

Gautreau v. Gautreau, 697 So. 2d 1339 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Wollerson v. Wollerson, 687 So. 2d 663 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(6)(b) — 11 cases

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Goss v. Goss, 673 So. 2d 1366 (La. Ct. App. 1996).

Gould v. Gould, 687 So. 2d 685 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Sequeira v. Sequeira, 888 So. 2d 1097 (La. Ct. App. 2004).

Sawyer v. Sawyer, 799 So. 2d 1226 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(6)(c) — 32 cases

Workman v. Workman, 632 N.W.2d 286 (Neb. 2001).

Norred v. Norred, 591 So. 2d 396 (La. Ct. App. 1991). “On December 5, 1990, this court reversed the part of the judgment increasing child support because of the trial court's failure to follow the statutory guidelines set forth in LSA-R.S. 9:315, et seq., and affirmed that part of the judgment which modified custody during holidays.”

Rosenbloom v. Rosenbloom, 654 So. 2d 877 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

State v. Flintroy, 599 So. 2d 331 (La. Ct. App. 1992). “However, because the trial court failed to properly follow the statutory guidelines for the determination of child support found in LSA-R.S. 9:315 et seq., and failed to give reasons for deviation from the guidelines, we amend the judgment to apply the guidelines.”

Germany v. Germany, 599 So. 2d 350 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(6)(e) — 3 cases

Shaw v. Shaw, 714 So. 2d 906 (La. Ct. App. 1998). “R.S. 9:315(4)(b). Likewise, Renee's ability to receive half-price meals while in uniform does not qualify under La.”

State v. Holland, 738 So. 2d 721 (La. Ct. App. 1999).

Laforge v. Laforge, 649 So. 2d 151 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(7) — 17 cases

Guillot v. Munn, 756 So. 2d 290 (La. 2000).

Harris v. Harris, 976 So. 2d 347 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Walden v. Walden, 835 So. 2d 513 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 9:315 et seq. was amended by Acts 2001, No.”

Shaw v. Shaw, 714 So. 2d 906 (La. Ct. App. 1998). “R.S. 9:315(4)(b). Likewise, Renee's ability to receive half-price meals while in uniform does not qualify under La.”

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(8) — 1 case

Loehr v. Loehr, 684 So. 2d 1177 (La. Ct. App. 1996).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(A) — 26 cases

Martello v. Martello, 960 So. 2d 186 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A). Income means the actual gross income of a party, if the party is employed to full capacity.”

State of Louisiana, Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie, 167 So. 3d 573 (La. 2015). “In addition, the child support guidelines, LSA-R.S. 9:315 et seq., apply to cases brought by the State under Title 46 (which includes the child support enforcement law, LSA-R.”

Romanowski v. Romanowski, 873 So. 2d 656 (La. Ct. App. 2004). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A); see LSA-C.C. art. 141.”

Riggs v. LaJaunie, 720 So. 2d 114 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

Luplow v. Luplow, 924 So. 2d 1135 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(B) — 1 case

Saucier v. Saucier, 719 So. 2d 702 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(B)(1) — 3 cases

Harrington v. Harrington, 989 So. 2d 838 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Hagen v. Hagen, 110 So. 3d 172 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

State, Dept. of Soc. Servs. v. Cruz, 998 So. 2d 837 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(B)(2) — 1 case

Hagen v. Hagen, 110 So. 3d 172 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C) — 1 case

Frederick v. Buckingham, 15 So. 3d 1223 (La. Ct. App. 2009).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(1) — 4 cases

Scott v. Scott, 989 So. 2d 290 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

State v. Reed, 5 So. 3d 269 (La. Ct. App. 2009).

Brossett v. Brossett, 195 So. 3d 471 (La. Ct. App. 2015).

Ola v. Ola, 985 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3) — 8 cases

Janney v. Janney, 943 So. 2d 396 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Walker v. Walker, 832 So. 2d 1098 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Holleman v. Barrilleaux, 161 So. 3d 789 (La. Ct. App. 2014).

Dazet v. Price, 204 So. 3d 1152 (La. Ct. App. 2016).

Lavigne v. James, 170 So. 3d 1163 (La. Ct. App. 2015).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(a) — 17 cases

Bonnecarrere v. Bonnecarrere, 37 So. 3d 1038 (La. Ct. App. 2010).

Earle v. Earle, 998 So. 2d 828 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Prestenback v. Prestenback, 9 So. 3d 172 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Scott v. Scott, 989 So. 2d 290 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Barlow v. Barlow, 87 So. 3d 386 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(b) — 5 cases

Lowentritt v. Lowentritt, 90 So. 3d 1081 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

State, Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. L.T., 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006). “The trial court found that this falls within the ambit of LSA-R.S. 9:315, which provides that gross income does not encompass per diem allowances, which are also not subject to federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code.”

State, Dss Ex Rel. Df v. Lt, 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006).

Shelly Bernstein v. Kenneth D. Bernstein (La. Ct. App. 2021).

Ola v. Ola, 985 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(c) — 6 cases

Scott v. Scott, 989 So. 2d 290 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Martello v. Martello, 960 So. 2d 186 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A). Income means the actual gross income of a party, if the party is employed to full capacity.”

Aydelott v. Aydelott, 957 So. 2d 350 (La. Ct. App. 2007).

Timothy Austin Scaife v. Deanna Ruth Scaife (La. Ct. App. 2026).

Abels v. Abels, 994 So. 2d 156 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(d) — 1 case

Ola v. Ola, 985 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(d)(i) — 3 cases

Molony v. Harris, 51 So. 3d 752 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “9:315(C)(3)(d)(i), which specifies that the determination of a parent’s gross income should not include child support received for purposes of determining that parent’s child support obligation.”

Anderson v. Anderson, 96 So. 3d 1278 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

Richard v. Richard, 930 So. 2d 156 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(d)(iii) — 1 case

Clement Arthur Dugue', III Versus Avingnon Marie Dugue' (La. Ct. App. 2021).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(3)(d)(iv) — 1 case

Bart Timothy Bordelon v. Jamie Lynn Difrancesco Bordelon (La. Ct. App. 2025).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(4) — 6 cases

Stephenson v. Stephenson, 847 So. 2d 175 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

McClanahan v. McClanahan, 169 So. 3d 587 (La. Ct. App. 2015).

State of Louisiana, Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs. in the Interest of E. R. & O. R. Versus Kirk Redmann (La. Ct. App. 2020).

State, Dss Ex Rel. Df v. Lt, 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(4)(a) — 5 cases

Curet v. Curet, 823 So. 2d 971 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Robichaux v. Robichaux, 879 So. 2d 279 (La. Ct. App. 2004).

State, Dss Ex Rel. Df v. Lt, 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006).

Bart Timothy Bordelon v. Jamie Lynn Difrancesco Bordelon (La. Ct. App. 2025).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(4)(b) — 2 cases

State, Dss Ex Rel. Df v. Lt, 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(4)(d)(ii) — 2 cases

State, Dss Ex Rel. Df v. Lt, 934 So. 2d 687 (La. 2006).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(4)(d)(iii) — 1 case

Pennington v. Pennington, 80 So. 3d 763 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(5) — 9 cases

Langley v. Langley, 982 So. 2d 881 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Arrington v. Arrington, 930 So. 2d 1068 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Harrington v. Harrington, 989 So. 2d 838 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Gardner v. Gardner, 946 So. 2d 321 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

State Dept. of Child. & Fam. Servs. Child Support Enf't v. Seaman, 86 So. 3d 785 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(5)(a) — 7 cases

Martello v. Martello, 960 So. 2d 186 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A). Income means the actual gross income of a party, if the party is employed to full capacity.”

Lambert v. Lambert, 960 So. 2d 921 (La. Ct. App. 2007).

Peacock v. Peacock, 903 So. 2d 506 (La. Ct. App. 2005).

Luplow v. Luplow, 924 So. 2d 1135 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Dazet v. Price, 204 So. 3d 1152 (La. Ct. App. 2016).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(5)(b) — 20 cases

Martello v. Martello, 960 So. 2d 186 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A). Income means the actual gross income of a party, if the party is employed to full capacity.”

Lambert v. Lambert, 960 So. 2d 921 (La. Ct. App. 2007).

Luplow v. Luplow, 924 So. 2d 1135 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

State, Dept. of Soc. Servs. v. Swords, 996 So. 2d 1267 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Langley v. Langley, 982 So. 2d 881 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(5)(c) — 14 cases

Semmes v. Semmes, 27 So. 3d 1024 (La. Ct. App. 2009).

State, Dept. of Soc. Servs. v. Swords, 996 So. 2d 1267 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Frederick v. Buckingham, 15 So. 3d 1223 (La. Ct. App. 2009).

State v. Reed, 5 So. 3d 269 (La. Ct. App. 2009).

Dazet v. Price, 204 So. 3d 1152 (La. Ct. App. 2016).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(5)(e) — 1 case

Ficarra v. Ficarra, 88 So. 3d 548 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(6) — 3 cases

State, Dss, Ex Rel. S. Mcc. v. Ja Mcc., 848 So. 2d 121 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

Curet v. Curet, 823 So. 2d 971 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

State, Dep't of Soc. Servs., Off. of Fam. Sec. v. Sensley, 63 So. 3d 229 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(6)(a) — 2 cases

Romanowski v. Romanowski, 873 So. 2d 656 (La. Ct. App. 2004). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A); see LSA-C.C. art. 141.”

Curet v. Curet, 823 So. 2d 971 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(6)(b) — 9 cases

Romanowski v. Romanowski, 873 So. 2d 656 (La. Ct. App. 2004). “LSA-R.S. 9:315(A); see LSA-C.C. art. 141.”

McCorvey v. McCorvey, 922 So. 2d 694 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Donna Gr v. James Br, 877 So. 2d 1164 (La. Ct. App. 2004).

State, Dss, Ex Rel. S. Mcc. v. Ja Mcc., 848 So. 2d 121 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

Anderson v. Anderson, 96 So. 3d 1278 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(6)(c) — 1 case

Evans v. Evans, 830 So. 2d 591 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(C)(7) — 2 cases

Hughes v. Talton, 947 So. 2d 735 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Broussard v. Rogers, 54 So. 3d 826 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(c) — 1 case

Harris v. Harris, 976 So. 2d 347 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(d) — 1 case

Stowe v. Stowe, 617 So. 2d 161 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(e)(3)(d)(iv) — 1 case

Anderson v. Anderson, 96 So. 3d 1278 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:315(l) — 1 case

Pratt v. Wells, 840 So. 2d 1230 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.