La. Rev. Stat. § 9:331
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
LA-LEGlegis.la.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
PART III. CHILD CUSTODY
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2024 · leading case: C.M.J. v. L.M.C., Wife of C.M.J.
C.M.J. v. L.M.C., Wife of C.M.J. (2014)
“R.S.9:331, “[t]he court may order an evaluation of a party or the child in a custody or visitation proceeding for good cause shown.”
Bonnette v. Bonnette (2016)
“R.S. 9:331 (B). In the case sub judice, the district court ordered an evaluation by Dr.”
Richard v. Richard (2009)
“R.S. 9:331. The trial court appointed Jeanne Robertson, PhD, a licensed professional counselor and marriage and family therapist, educator, and custody evaluator, to evaluate the parties.”
Cerwonka v. Baker (2006)
“R.S. 9:331. Ms. Baker filed a rule to show cause why Dr.”
Huber v. Midkiff (2003)
“Huber, or in the alternative, visitation; 2) the appointment of a mental health evaluator according to LSA-R.S. 9:331; [2] and 3) interim visitation pending the appointment of the evaluator.”
Ferrand v. Ferrand (2016)
“R.S. 9:331. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the trial court as it relates to the denial of Vincent’s petition for custody and remand this matter to the trial court for the purpose of appointing a mental health evaluator pursuant to La.”
Hilkirk v. Johnson (2015)
“R.S. 9:331. 5 On April 15, 2008, the trial court appointed Alicia Pellegrin, Ph.”
Mimms v. Brown (2003)
“R.S. 9:331(B) states: The court may order a party or the child to submit to and cooperate in the *44 evaluation, testing, or interview by the mental health professional.”
Silbernagel v. Silbernagel (2007)
“R.S. 9:331 provides: A. The court may order an evaluation of a party or the child in a custody or visitation proceeding for good cause shown.”
LEARD v. Schenker (2010)
“R.S. 9:331 A. This provision, however, does not extend to ordering the costs of one party's treatment to be paid by the other.”
Griffith v. Latiolais (2010)
“R.S. 9:331 gives the trial court authority to "order an evaluation of a party or the child in a custody or visitation proceeding for good cause shown.”
Pinegar v. Harris (2007)
“Harris also would not agree to a custody evaluation under LSA-R.S. 9:331. Accordingly, at the end of the hearing on the rule to modify custody, the trial court rendered its judgment.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:331(A) — 6 cases
Bonnette v. Bonnette (2016)
“R.S. 9:331 (B). In the case sub judice, the district court ordered an evaluation by Dr.”
Arbuckle v. Arbuckle (2002)
Hughes v. Talton (2003)
C.L.S. v. G.J.S. (2007)
Barker v. Barker (2014)
— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:331(B) — 6 cases
Mimms v. Brown (2003)
“R.S. 9:331(B) states: The court may order a party or the child to submit to and cooperate in the *44 evaluation, testing, or interview by the mental health professional.”
Barker v. Barker (2014)
Evans v. Evans (2018)
Fuge v. Uiterwyk (1995)
C.L.S. v. G.J.S. (2007)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.