La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:5351 (2026)

PART III.  CHATTEL MORTGAGES

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART III.  CHATTEL MORTGAGES

§5351.  Repealed by Acts 2001, No. 128, §18, eff. July 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1951–2022 · leading case: Arenson Intern., Inc. v. Shelving Sys. Corp., 369 So. 2d 1212 (La. Ct. App. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arenson Intern., Inc. v. Shelving Sys. Corp., 369 So. 2d 1212 (La. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 6× “American Bank's floor plan mortgage described the property as follows: "All of the masses or assemblages of inventory, and equipment contained, and to be kept, in the offices and warehouse of Shelving Systems Corporation located at 1023 Jack Wells Boulevard, Shreveport,…”
Rayne State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co., 483 So. 2d 987 (La. 1986). “Rayne State Bank alleges that Noble Chambers is responsible for the monetary damage it suffered because of the defective mortgages, basing its complaint against him on his alleged negligence in preparing the mortgages in disregard of the Chattel Mortgage Act, R.S. 9:5351 et…”
Dupre v. Joe's Riverside Seafood, Inc., 578 So. 2d 158 (La. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “The 1987 date found in the stipulation must be the result of a typographical error.”
All State Credit Plan Houma, Inc. v. Fournier, 175 So. 2d 707 (La. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 3× “, Model Number 12005 C bears Serial Number 9568243 instead of 68243 as listed in the hereinabove mentioned chattel mortgage.”
Harper v. Borden Co., 129 So. 2d 330 (La. Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 2× “, and Abbott cases were all proceedings to contest *336 the validity of chattel mortgages under the Chattel Mortgage Act, LSA-R.S. 9:5351 et seq., and none of those cases presented the question of the validity of a chattel mortgage which had been correctly noted on a certificate…”
Sandoz v. First Nat'l Bank of Lafayette, LA. (In Re Exclusive Indus. Corp.), 41 B.R. 493 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1984). · cites it 2× “University (Highway 182 North) Lafayette, Louisiana, it being intended that this mortgage shall constitute a Bulk Chattel Mortgage within the meaning of LSA R.S. 9:5351 et seq; and a Mortgage of Movable Used in Commercial or Industrial Activity within the meaning of LSA R.”
Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Little Ford, Inc., 522 So. 2d 1124 (La. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “) The document also states that this mortgage shall attach to and shall affect all similar property acquired by Mortgagor (Little Ford), by purchase or otherwise, as part of its inventory and stock-in-trade as provided for under LSA-R.S. 9:5351 et seq. and LSA-R.S. 32:701 et seq.”
Morgan v. Campbell, Campbell & Johnson, 561 So. 2d 926 (La. Ct. App. 1990). “All of the transactions antedated the repeal of LSA-R.S. 9:5351, et seq. In 1983, under LSA-R.”
Rayne State Bank & Tr. Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 409 (La. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “R.S. 9:5351. Subsequent to the preparation and recordation of the mortgages, Mr.”
Action Fin. Corp. v. Nichols, 180 So. 2d 81 (La. Ct. App. 1965). “In this regard, it may be pointed out that neither the provisions of the statute, with reference to chattel mortgages generally, LSA-R.S. 9:5351 et seq., nor the provisions of the Vehicle Certificate of Title law, with reference to chattel mortgages on motor vehicles, LSA-R.”
Ogden v. Barby Jt. Venture, 525 So. 2d 1 (La. Ct. App. 1988). “R.S. 9:5351 through 5366, and nowhere therein is a "foreign security interest" defined.”
Abbott v. Temple, 73 So. 2d 647 (La. Ct. App. 1954). “1 and 2, now LSA-R.S. 9:5351 and 9:5352, as further amended in 1950: “In order to secure the performance of any obligation, including future advances, it shall be lawful by complying with the provisions of this Part to mortgage any and every kind of movable property and to…”
Show all 30 citing cases →
— La. Rev. Stat. § 9:5351(B) — 1 case
Dupre v. Joe's Riverside Seafood, Inc., 578 So. 2d 158 (La. Ct. App. 1991). “The 1987 date found in the stipulation must be the result of a typographical error.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.