La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:4341 (2026)

PART III.  CROP PLEDGES

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART III.  CROP PLEDGES

SUBPART A.  IN GENERAL

§4341.  Repealed by Acts 2001, No. 128, §18, eff. July 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1956–1999 · leading case: City Bank & Trust Co. v. Marksville Elevator Co., 221 So. 2d 853 (La. Ct. App. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Deposit Guar. Nat'l Bank v. Cent. Louisiana Grain Co-Op, Inc., 737 So. 2d 167 (La. Ct. App. 1999). “This change in the law made clear the legislature’s intent for the term “security device” to |sinclude not only a written crop pledge established pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 9:4341, but also 1 the privilege of the combineman and the privilege of the lessor, both of which…”
Henry v. Pioneer Sweet Potato Co., Inc., 614 So. 2d 853 (La. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “LSA-R.S. 9:4341 to 9:4381 contains the provisions governing the creation and recordation of crop pledges.”
Howard v. Stokes, 607 So. 2d 868 (La. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “had Stokes execute a written crop pledge pursuant to LSA-R.S. 9:4341, et seq., and the pledge was recorded in accordance with the provisions of LSA-R.”
Am. Sec. Bank v. Farmers Drier & Storage Co., 544 So. 2d 1346 (La. Ct. App. 1989). “AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. GUIDRY, J., concurs in the result.”
Pelican Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Ruth J. Coco (In re Schexnyder), 46 B.R. 260 (W.D. La. 1984). · cites it 7× “R.S. 9:4341, which reads, “The right of a pledge thus conferred shall be subordinate to that of the claim of laborers for wages and for the rent upon the land upon which the crop is being produced.”
Evangeline Bank & Trust Co. v. Deville, 367 So. 2d 1252 (La. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 3× “To secure the loan he gave a crop pledge on his expected crop in conformity with R.S. 9:4341 et seq. The pledge was duly recorded with the Evangeline Parish Clerk of Court.”
Top Crop Seed & Supply Co. v. Am. Grain Ass'n, 304 So. 2d 805 (La. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 5× “Plaintiff bases its suit for recovery on the crop pledge statutes contained in LSA R.S. 9:4341 et seq. (specifically LSA R.S.”
McGill v. Griffith, 273 So. 2d 366 (La. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 2× “9:4521 and the jurisprudence thereunder, is outranked by Harrell’s crop pledge under LSA-R.S. 9:4341 and the jurisprudence interpreting the latter.”
City Bank & Trust Co. v. Marksville Elevator Co., 221 So. 2d 853 (La. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 5× “Meco's employee who issued checks in payment of soybeans purchased from Webster and Carter testified that such soybeans were shipped directly from Natchitoches to Port Allen for delivery for the account of the defendant with Cargill, a general shipper there located.”
Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Wm. T. Burton Indus., Inc., 217 So. 2d 188 (La. 1968). · cites it 2× “[6] LSA-R.S. 9:4341, Source, Act 66 of 1874 and Act 93 of 1922, provides: "In addition to the privilege conferred by law, any planter or farmer may pledge or pawn any agricultural crop, either planted and growing or in contemplation of being planted, in order to secure the…”
Soileau v. Gibbs, 87 So. 2d 312 (La. 1956). · cites it 2× “Primarily involved in this cause is a promissory note secured by a recorded crop pledge granted pursuant to the provisions of LSA-R.S. 9:4341. Under date of May 10, 1951 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.