Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 1-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2009, c. 325, Pt. A, §1 (RP). PL 2009, c. 325, Pt. A, §4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1968–2014 · leading case: Lincoln Pulp & Paper Co., Inc. v. Dravo Corp., 445 F. Supp. 507 (D. Me. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lincoln Pulp & Paper Co., Inc. v. Dravo Corp., 445 F. Supp. 507 (D. Me. 1977). “Preliminary The parties agree that the issues of contract formation and interpretation are governed by the Maine Uniform Commercial Code, 11 M.R.S.A. § 1-101 et seq., see 11 M.R.S.”
State v. Bob Chambers Ford, Inc., 522 A.2d 362 (Me. 1987). “Statute of Limitations Chambers argues that the court’s finding that the Chambers rustproofing warranties unlawfully limited the customers’ remedies was also a finding that the warranties were in violation of certain sections of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), 11 M.R.S.A. §§…”
Quigley v. Caron, 247 A.2d 94 (Me. 1968). “" Uniform Commercial Code—11 M.R.S.A. §§ 1-101 et seq. "Purposes; Rules of Construction; Variation by Agreement.”
In Re Dorsey, 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “[32] References to the Uniform Commercial Code are to Maine's codification, found in Title 11 of the Maine Revised Statutes Annotated, 11 M.R.S.A. § 1-101, et seq. Article 9 is found at 11 M.”
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lyford (In Re Lyford), 22 B.R. 222 (Bankr. D. Me. 1982). “Even assuming, without deciding, that the definition of “vehicle” does encompass only the cab and chassis, the court finds that the components in question are accessions, and, therefore, the plaintiff’s security interests therein were properly perfected.”
Todd Equip. Leasing Co. v. Milligan, 395 A.2d 818 (Me. 1978). “Similarly, the Defendants produced no evidence sufficient to justify a conclusion that the Plaintiff had fraudulently induced the lessee company to lease the equipment knowing that the equipment would be defective and maintenance service would be inadequate. 1 In sum, the issues…”
Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Keach (In re Montreal, Maine & Atl. Ry., Ltd.), 521 B.R. 703 (1st Cir. BAP 2014). “Article 9 of the Maine UCC Article 9 of the UCC enables a creditor to obtain a security interest in the personal property or fixtures of a debtor, including goods, documents, instruments, *709 payment intangibles, chattel paper, or accounts. It is undisputed that Wheeling has a…”
First Nat'l Bank of Bar Harbor v. United States, Dep't of Agric., Farmers Home Admin. (In re Dorsey), 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “References to the Uniform Commercial Code are to Maine’s codification, found in Title 11 of the Maine Revised Statutes Annotated, 11 M.R.S.A. § 1-101, et seq. Article 9 is found at 11 M.”
Durastone, Inc. v. J.P. Martin & Sons Constr. Corp. (Me. Super. Ct 2001). “DISCUSSION The Uniform Commercial Code, 11 M.R.S.A. §§ 1-101 et seq. (1995 & Supp.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp., 684 F. Supp. 724 (D. Me. 1988). “The Court’s review of all the contract documents, and in particular Foster Wheeler’s December 14, 1973 letter transmitting its proposal, Plaintiffs Exhibit 2, and CMP’s purchase order incorporating its purchase order attachment, Plaintiffs Exhibits 11 and 10, indicates that the…”
Key Bank of Maine v. Estes, 669 A.2d 162 (Me. 1995). “The general rule pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code, 11 M.R.S.A. §§ 1-101— 10-108 (1995), is that “a security interest continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, exchange or other disposition thereof, unless the disposition was authorized by the secured party in the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.