Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 2-717 (2026)

Deduction of damages from price

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The buyer on notifying the seller of his intention to do so may deduct all or any part of the damages resulting from any breach of the contract from any part of the price still due under the same contract.   [PL 1965, c. 306, §9 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 306, §9 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1995 · leading case: Adamatic v. Progressive Baking Co., Inc., 667 A.2d 871 (Me. 1995).
Adamatic v. Progressive Baking Co., Inc., 667 A.2d 871 (Me. 1995). “Adamatic concedes that pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-717 a buyer may deduct damages resulting from the seller’s breach of the contract from any part of the price still due pursuant to the contract.”
M.K. Assocs. v. Stowell Prods., Inc., 697 F. Supp. 20 (D. Me. 1988). “” 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-717. A buyer claiming a breach of contract after accepting goods must, however, notify the seller of the breach within a reasonable time after discovery of the breach, or the buyer will be barred from any breach of contract remedy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.