Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-307 (2026)

Protection of buyers of goods

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 306, §§26,27 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 526, §§51,52 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2002 · leading case: Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A., 2002 ME 18 (Me. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A., 2002 ME 18 (Me. 2002). · cites it 4× “" 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-307(1) (1995). Farm Credit apparently relies on the farm products exception to the buyer in the ordinary course rule contained in section 9-307(1) to support its contention that MFX took the potatoes subject to its security interest.”
Fischer v. Bar Harbor Banking & Trust Co., 673 F. Supp. 622 (D. Me. 1987). · cites it 3× “” The gravamen of the slander of title action is that on March 12, 1984, when the Bank filed a financing statement asserting a security interest in the hull which plaintiff had contracted to buy, plaintiff was a “buyer in the ordinary course of business,” see Me.Rev.Stat.Ann.…”
Key Bank of Maine v. Estes, 669 A.2d 162 (Me. 1995). · cites it 2× “The Bank contends that the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that, pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-307(1) (1995), the Estes as buyers in the ordinary course of business hold title to the boat free of the Bank’s security interest.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-307(1) — 3 cases
Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A., 2002 ME 18 (Me. 2002). “" 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-307(1) (1995). Farm Credit apparently relies on the farm products exception to the buyer in the ordinary course rule contained in section 9-307(1) to support its contention that MFX took the potatoes subject to its security interest.”
Fischer v. Bar Harbor Banking & Trust Co., 673 F. Supp. 622 (D. Me. 1987). “” The gravamen of the slander of title action is that on March 12, 1984, when the Bank filed a financing statement asserting a security interest in the hull which plaintiff had contracted to buy, plaintiff was a “buyer in the ordinary course of business,” see Me.Rev.Stat.Ann.…”
Key Bank of Maine v. Estes, 669 A.2d 162 (Me. 1995). “The Bank contends that the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that, pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-307(1) (1995), the Estes as buyers in the ordinary course of business hold title to the boat free of the Bank’s security interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.