Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-313 (2026)

Priority of security interests in fixtures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 306, §29 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 526, §§65-72 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 696, §141 (RPR). PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1982–2006 · leading case: Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of Maine, 601 A.2d 91 (Me. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of Maine, 601 A.2d 91 (Me. 1992). · cites it 4× “LBG contends that Key Bank consented to the transaction within the meaning of 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-313(5)(a). There is no evidence of consent by Key Bank and the contention is without merit.”
Yeadon Fabric Domes, Inc. v. Maine Sports Complex, LLC, 901 A.2d 200 (Me. 2006). “§ 9-1334 (2005) was enacted to replace 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-313 (1995), but 10 M.R.S.”
Bezanson v. Kennebunk Sav. Bank (In Re Ladd), 21 B.R. 579 (Bankr. D. Me. 1982). “The trustee next contends that the Ladds’ home is a fixture subject to the “fixture filing” requirements of Me.Rev. Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 9-313. 2 This court need not decide that question, for, even assuming that the Ladds’ home is a fixture, it is collateral for the Bank’s loan…”
Heritage Sav. Bank v. Merch. (In re Merch.), 38 B.R. 182 (Bankr. D. Me. 1984). “See Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, §§ 9-313, 9-402(5), 9-402(6).”
Jamo v. Wetterau Portland, Inc. (In re Jamo), 83 B.R. 178 (Bankr. D. Me. 1988). “” The financing statements also fail to meet the “fixture filing” requirements of Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 9-313(l)(b) and § 9-402(5) that a financing statement be filed in “the office where a mortgage on the real estate would be filed or recorded” and contain a description…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-313(5)(a) — 1 case
Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of Maine, 601 A.2d 91 (Me. 1992). “LBG contends that Key Bank consented to the transaction within the meaning of 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-313(5)(a). There is no evidence of consent by Key Bank and the contention is without merit.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-313(7) — 1 case
Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of Maine, 601 A.2d 91 (Me. 1992). “LBG contends that Key Bank consented to the transaction within the meaning of 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-313(5)(a). There is no evidence of consent by Key Bank and the contention is without merit.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-313(l)(a) — 1 case
Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of Maine, 601 A.2d 91 (Me. 1992). “LBG contends that Key Bank consented to the transaction within the meaning of 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-313(5)(a). There is no evidence of consent by Key Bank and the contention is without merit.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-313(l)(b) — 2 cases
Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of Maine, 601 A.2d 91 (Me. 1992). “LBG contends that Key Bank consented to the transaction within the meaning of 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-313(5)(a). There is no evidence of consent by Key Bank and the contention is without merit.”
Jamo v. Wetterau Portland, Inc. (In re Jamo), 83 B.R. 178 (Bankr. D. Me. 1988). “” The financing statements also fail to meet the “fixture filing” requirements of Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 9-313(l)(b) and § 9-402(5) that a financing statement be filed in “the office where a mortgage on the real estate would be filed or recorded” and contain a description…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.