Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7036 (2026)

Prohibited acts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 420, §1 (NEW). PL 1981, c. 641, §2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 588, §4 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 532 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 307, §3 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 414, §A1 (RP). PL 2003, c. 414, §D7 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 614, §9 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2006 · leading case: State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006).
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). · cites it 2× “Violation of a commissioner’s rule, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7036(1) (1994). The rule that Perry is charged with violating is hunting an antlerless deer without a permit.”
Maine Dep't of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, 503 A.2d 1285 (Me. 1986). · cites it 2× “The Union challenges the Superior Court’s conclusion that by the enactment of 12 M.R.S.A. § 7036(6) (Supp.1985-1986), the Legislature placed a specific prohibition on the personal use of State vehicles by game wardens, thus removing the negotiated vehicle use policy from the…”
State v. Bresett, 750 A.2d 1252 (Me. 2000). “See 12 M.R.S.A. § 7036 (1994). 1 Specifically, he was charged with using a live trap to trap bears.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7036(1) — 1 case
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). “Violation of a commissioner’s rule, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7036(1) (1994). The rule that Perry is charged with violating is hunting an antlerless deer without a permit.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7036(6) — 1 case
Maine Dep't of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, 503 A.2d 1285 (Me. 1986). “The Union challenges the Superior Court’s conclusion that by the enactment of 12 M.R.S.A. § 7036(6) (Supp.1985-1986), the Legislature placed a specific prohibition on the personal use of State vehicles by game wardens, thus removing the negotiated vehicle use policy from the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.