Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7452 (2026)

Prohibited acts relating to bear

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 420, §1 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 543, §§38-40 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 723, §§18,18A,18B (AMD). PL 1981, c. 644, §§21-23 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 369, §§17,18 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 317, §§19-21 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 587 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 696, §10 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 742, §8 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 493, §§30-34 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 913, §§A9,B7 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 455, §§27,28 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 282, §1 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 322, §§1-7 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 403, §20 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 331, §§3-10 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 333, §§12-15 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 414, §A1 (RP). PL 2003, c. 414, §D7 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 614, §9 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006).
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). · cites it 3× “Unlawfully hunting bear with dogs, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7452(1) (1994). There was evidence that on September 18, while hunting bear, the warden and others in the hunting party, which included Perry, released three dogs, and then Perry told the warden to release two more dogs, which he…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7452(1) — 1 case
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). “Unlawfully hunting bear with dogs, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7452(1) (1994). There was evidence that on September 18, while hunting bear, the warden and others in the hunting party, which included Perry, released three dogs, and then Perry told the warden to release two more dogs, which he…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7452(14) — 1 case
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). “Unlawfully hunting bear with dogs, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7452(1) (1994). There was evidence that on September 18, while hunting bear, the warden and others in the hunting party, which included Perry, released three dogs, and then Perry told the warden to release two more dogs, which he…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.