Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7458 (2026)

Prohibited acts relating to deer

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 420, §1 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 543, §§45-47 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 704, §§11,12 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 723, §§18C-19B (AMD). PL 1981, c. 414, §§33,34 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 644, §§25-27 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 186 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 369, §20 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 144 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 685, §3 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 493, §36 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 705, §2 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 156, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 438, §§31-33 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 455, §§32,33 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 282, §2 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 322, §§8-12 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 403, §§22,23 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 588, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 331, §§13-20 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 333, §§17-19 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 414, §A1 (RP). PL 2003, c. 414, §D7 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 614, §9 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2006 · leading case: State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006).
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). · cites it 2× “Driving deer, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(10) (Pamph.2003). The warden testified that Perry participated in a drive for deer on November 27, 2003.”
Trask v. Devlin, 2002 ME 10 (Me. 2002). “Trafton was also charged with false registration of a deer, Class E, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(7) (1994). [¶ 6] During the investigation on November 23, the wardens had taken temperature readings from various parts of the deer at certain intervals.”
State v. Cloutier, 814 A.2d 966 (Me. 2003). · cites it 4× “” 5 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(10) (1994). The statutory definition for driving deer provides: “To ‘chive deer or moose’ means an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase or otherwise frighten or cause a deer or moose to move in the direction-.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7458(10) — 2 cases
State v. Perry, 899 A.2d 806 (Me. 2006). “Driving deer, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(10) (Pamph.2003). The warden testified that Perry participated in a drive for deer on November 27, 2003.”
State v. Cloutier, 814 A.2d 966 (Me. 2003). “” 5 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(10) (1994). The statutory definition for driving deer provides: “To ‘chive deer or moose’ means an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase or otherwise frighten or cause a deer or moose to move in the direction-.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7458(11) — 1 case
State v. Cloutier, 814 A.2d 966 (Me. 2003). “” 5 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(10) (1994). The statutory definition for driving deer provides: “To ‘chive deer or moose’ means an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase or otherwise frighten or cause a deer or moose to move in the direction-.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7458(15)(I) — 1 case
State v. Cloutier, 814 A.2d 966 (Me. 2003). “” 5 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(10) (1994). The statutory definition for driving deer provides: “To ‘chive deer or moose’ means an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase or otherwise frighten or cause a deer or moose to move in the direction-.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7458(7) — 1 case
Trask v. Devlin, 2002 ME 10 (Me. 2002). “Trafton was also charged with false registration of a deer, Class E, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7458(7) (1994). [¶ 6] During the investigation on November 23, the wardens had taken temperature readings from various parts of the deer at certain intervals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.