Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7801 (2026)

Prohibited acts

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1979, c. 420, §1 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 543, §§72-76 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 723, §§35,36 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 644, §34 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 698, §74 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 572, §§4,12 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 632, §§A3,B2,B7 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 304, §22 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 196, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 406, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 469, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 599, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 913, §§A13,B12 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 28 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 455, §40 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 667, §B8 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 679, §5 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 540, §2 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 739, §§2-6 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 400, §1 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 436, §1 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 697, §§1-4 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 790, §§O1,2 (AMD). RR 2001, c. 1, §16 (COR). PL 2001, c. 387, §§32-34 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 421, §§B81-83 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 421, §C1 (AFF). PL 2001, c. 434, §A4 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 471, §§D11,12 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 638, §§1-5 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 258, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 277, §1 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 403, §27 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 414, §A1 (RP). PL 2003, c. 414, §D7 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 484, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 614, §9 (AFF).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1982–2002 · leading case: Bedard v. Bateman, 665 A.2d 214 (Me. 1995).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Giles, 669 A.2d 192 (Me. 1996). “) convicting him of operating a watercraft while under the influence of alcohol in violation of 12 M.R.S.A § 7801(9) (1994). The basis of Giles’ appeal is a ruling entered in the District Court (Wiscasset, Field, J.”

Bedard v. Bateman, 665 A.2d 214 (Me. 1995). “We reject this contention because Maine law permitted Joanna to operate the watercraft legally at age 13, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(13) (1994), and she had operated it without incident.”

Daniel v. Comm'r of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife, 566 A.2d 737 (Me. 1989). “Between 20 and 50 violations of law were identified on each checkpoint day, with the most prevalent violations being insufficient life jackets, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(16)(A) (1981), importation of too much beer, 28-A M.”

State v. Prior, 662 A.2d 225 (Me. 1995). “) following a jury verdict finding him guilty of operating a watercraft under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(9) (1994), failure to sign a summons, 17-A M.”

State v. Haven, 2002 ME 38 (Me. 2002). · cites it 2× “1 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(10) (1994). Haven contends that the evidence was not sufficient to support his conviction.”

State v. Sylmor-Slosberg, 451 A.2d 302 (Me. 1982). “After a bench trial in Superior Court (Cumberland County), defendant Ruth Syl-mor-Slosberg was convicted of operating a motorboat without a certificate of number, in violation of 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(1) (1981), and was fined $75.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7801(1) — 1 case

State v. Sylmor-Slosberg, 451 A.2d 302 (Me. 1982). “After a bench trial in Superior Court (Cumberland County), defendant Ruth Syl-mor-Slosberg was convicted of operating a motorboat without a certificate of number, in violation of 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(1) (1981), and was fined $75.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7801(10) — 1 case

State v. Haven, 2002 ME 38 (Me. 2002). “1 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(10) (1994). Haven contends that the evidence was not sufficient to support his conviction.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7801(13) — 1 case

Bedard v. Bateman, 665 A.2d 214 (Me. 1995). “We reject this contention because Maine law permitted Joanna to operate the watercraft legally at age 13, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(13) (1994), and she had operated it without incident.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7801(16)(A) — 1 case

Daniel v. Comm'r of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife, 566 A.2d 737 (Me. 1989). “Between 20 and 50 violations of law were identified on each checkpoint day, with the most prevalent violations being insufficient life jackets, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(16)(A) (1981), importation of too much beer, 28-A M.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7801(9) — 2 cases

State v. Giles, 669 A.2d 192 (Me. 1996). “) convicting him of operating a watercraft while under the influence of alcohol in violation of 12 M.R.S.A § 7801(9) (1994). The basis of Giles’ appeal is a ruling entered in the District Court (Wiscasset, Field, J.”

State v. Prior, 662 A.2d 225 (Me. 1995). “) following a jury verdict finding him guilty of operating a watercraft under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7801(9) (1994), failure to sign a summons, 17-A M.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.