Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 6009 (2026)

Judgment for plaintiff; possession on recognizance; damages

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 172, §2 (RPR). PL 1995, c. 448, §3 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1989 · leading case: North Sch. Congregate Hous. v. Merrithew, 558 A.2d 1189 (Me. 1989).
North Sch. Congregate Hous. v. Merrithew, 558 A.2d 1189 (Me. 1989). “The authors referred to 14 M.R.S.A. § 6009 which, until 1979, provided that on appeal in an FED action “if on trial the jury find for the defendant they shall find the damages sustained by him.”
Champagne v. Fortin, 402 A.2d 471 (Me. 1979). “In view of the result reached, it is not necessary to consider appellant’s contention that a writ of possession was improperly issued because the appellees failed to provide surety in compliance with 14 M.R.S.A. § 6009 (1964). The entry is: Appeal sustained.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.