Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 15
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 1742 (2026)

Punishment when previous sentence to State Prison

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 499, §2 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1968–1976 · leading case: United States v. James Howard Stewart, 531 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. James Howard Stewart, 531 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1976). “See Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1742 (1965).”
Thoresen v. State, 239 A.2d 654 (Me. 1968). “2d 409 (Opinion January 23, 1968) we liberally construed the statute to permit its use by one under actual restraint in Maine in execution of a sentence imposed under the so-called “habitual crimi *656 nal” statute (15 M.R.S.A. § 1742), it being alleged that there had been an…”
Mottram v. State, 263 A.2d 715 (Me. 1970). “149, § 3 (which is now 15 M.R.S.A. § 1742). Although frequently called the Habitual Criminal Act it is more properly designated as the Recidivist Statute.”
Mottram v. Murch, 330 F. Supp. 51 (D. Me. 1971). “149, § 3 (1954), as amended, 15 M.R.S.A. § 1742 (Maine’s habitual offender statute).”
Green v. State, 237 A.2d 409 (Me. 1968). “1961 and, as amended, is now 15 M.R.S.A. § 1742. 2 . In Beaulieu the petitioner, without representation by counsel, was convicted in a Municipal Court for larceny and sentenced to the Reformatory for Men.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.