Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 2852 (2026)

Appeal; hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An appeal from a decision of the municipal officers or county commissioners under section 2851 or section 2856 must be to the Superior Court, pursuant to the provisions of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 80B.   [PL 2017, c. 136, §2 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 284 (RPR). PL 1979, c. 27, §4 (RPR). PL 1997, c. 6, §2 (AMD). PL 2017, c. 136, §2 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–2020 · leading case: Hollie A. Beal v. Town of Stockton Springs, 2017 ME 6 (Me. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hollie A. Beal v. Town of Stockton Springs, 2017 ME 6 (Me. 2017). “In the “disposition” portion of the order, the Board included requirements that Beal have a licensed plumber and a licensed electrician bring the building up to code, and required her to “repair and/or replace all structural members” by August 26, 2015.”
Lerman v. City of Portland, 675 F. Supp. 11 (D. Me. 1987). “See Rule 80B(b) and 17 M.R.S.A. § 2852. If an estoppel was raised by the conduct of the parties and the prior demolition order had thus become void, requiring issuance of a new demolition order, the Court finds Defendant's proposition that Plaintiff has received all the process…”
Lerman v. Inhabitants of City of Portland, 406 A.2d 903 (Me. 1979). “17 M.R.S.A. § 2852 provides: Any person aggrieved by such order may, within 30 days after said order is made and recorded, file an appeal therefrom to any Justice of the Supreme Judicial or Superior Court who shall, after notice and hearing, affirm, annul or alter such order and…”
Jurkenas v. City of Brewer (D. Me. 2020). “17 M.R.S. § 2852. The record reveals that the City Council scheduled a public hearing to determine whether Plaintiffs’ home constituted a “dangerous building.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.