Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1152 (2026)

Authorized sentences

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1975, c. 499, §1 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 740, §§107,108 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 53, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 455, §1 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 510, §§67-A (AMD). PL 1981, c. 493, §2 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 821, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 157, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 769, §B3 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 502, §§D10-13 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 288 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 824, §A25 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 103, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 136, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 560, §K82 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 560, §K83 (AFF). PL 1995, c. 680, §4 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 24, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 354, §3 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 439, §OOO2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §B6 (REV). PL 2003, c. 711, §§A7-9,B13 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 265, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 527, §§12,13 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 142, §5 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 365, Pt. A, §3 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 133, §§8, 9 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 308, §3 (AMD). PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §1 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 24 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009). · cites it 18× “" [2] (Effective July 4, 1996) (codified at 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-C) (Supp.1996)) (emphasis added).”

Doe v. Dist. Attorney, 932 A.2d 552 (Me. 2007). · cites it 7× “Title 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-C) was also enacted to provide that, as part of the sentence, the court must order convicted sex offenders to satisfy all requirements of SORNA.”

State v. Johnson, 2006 ME 35 (Me. 2006). · cites it 6× “[¶ 12] When Johnson was sentenced on November 8, 2000, former 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-C) provided: “As part of a sentence, the court shall order every natural person who is a convicted sex offender or sexually violent predator, as defined under Title 34-A, section 11203 to…”

John Doe XLVI v. Stephanie Anderson, 2015 ME 3 (Me. 2015). · cites it 4× “” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-0 (Supp.2002). 4 The section of SORNA regarding an offender’s duty to register likewise provided, “The court shall determine at the time of sentencing if a defendant is a sex offender or a sexually violent predator.”

State v. O'donnell, 495 A.2d 798 (Me. 1985). · cites it 2× “" (emphasis added) 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-A). Whether restitution is imposed directly or as a condition of probation under § 1204(2-A)(B), a sentencing justice may only require a convicted person "[t]o make restitution pursuant to chapter 54 .”

State v. Fournier, 617 A.2d 998 (Me. 1992). · cites it 2× “See 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 1152(2)(D) & 1256(2) (1983 & Supp.”

Matter of Ross, 428 A.2d 858 (Me. 1981). “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2)(B). In the case which had not been tried, the attorney for the State might have elected to file a dismissal.”

State v. White, 2001 ME 65 (Me. 2001). “Although, in the present case, it was within the court’s general authority to sentence defendant for the Class E offense of operating after suspension to the same length of imprisonment and the same amount of fine even if the mandatory provisions had not applied, 17-A M.R.S.A.…”

State v. Beaudoin, 503 A.2d 1289 (Me. 1986). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-A) (1983). We conclude that there is no statutory authority for a judge, in sentencing a defendant for the crime of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in damage to another vehicle, to order the defendant to make restitution to the owner of that…”

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Jud. Court, 355 A.2d 341 (Me. 1976). “17-A MRSA § 1152, sub-§ 4, as enacted by PL 1975, c.”

State v. Hopkins, 526 A.2d 945 (Me. 1987). “Title 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2-A) (Supp. 1986) provides that: Every natural person convicted of a crime may be required to make restitution as authorized by chapter 54.”

State of Maine v. Ronald T. Cummings, 2023 ME 35 (Me. 2023). “” 16 [¶29] Although Cummings, in arguing that his original sentence was not illegal, is correct in asserting that it would have been “perfectly legal [for the court] to impose a split sentence and probation rather than supervised release,” see 17-A M.”

Show all 24 citing cases →

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1152(2)(A) — 2 cases

State v. Lane, 649 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1994).

State v. Haines, 620 A.2d 875 (Me. 1993).

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1152(2)(B) — 3 cases

Matter of Ross, 428 A.2d 858 (Me. 1981). “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1152(2)(B). In the case which had not been tried, the attorney for the State might have elected to file a dismissal.”

State of Maine v. Ronald T. Cummings, 2023 ME 35 (Me. 2023). “” 16 [¶29] Although Cummings, in arguing that his original sentence was not illegal, is correct in asserting that it would have been “perfectly legal [for the court] to impose a split sentence and probation rather than supervised release,” see 17-A M.”

State v. Libby, 556 A.2d 1099 (Me. 1989).

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1152(2)(D) — 2 cases

State v. Fournier, 617 A.2d 998 (Me. 1992). “See 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 1152(2)(D) & 1256(2) (1983 & Supp.”

State v. Dadiego, 617 A.2d 552 (Me. 1992).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.