Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1207 (2026)

Review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 701, §29 (NEW). PL 1981, c. 238, §9 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 234, §3 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 273, §3 (RPR). PL 1999, c. 731, §ZZZ25 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 731, §ZZZ42 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 17, §5 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 431, §41 (RPR). PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1992–2019 · leading case: Jonathan A. Petgrave v. State of Maine, 2019 ME 72 (Me. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jonathan A. Petgrave v. State of Maine, 2019 ME 72 (Me. 2019). · cites it 5× “BACKGROUND [¶2] In August 2016, after Jonathan Petgrave pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawful possession of a scheduled drug (Class B), 17-A M.R.”
State v. Collins, 681 A.2d 1168 (Me. 1996). · cites it 5× “The statutory right of appeal from a revocation of probation decision is set forth in 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1207 (Supp.1995). 4 Although neither section 1207 nor any Maine statute specifically addresses a probationer’s right of direct appeal of a court’s decision to modify probation,…”
State v. Almurshidy, 1999 ME 97 (Me. 1999). · cites it 2× “" 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1207(2) (Supp.1998). The manner and conditions of the appeal are provided by rule.”
Jonathan M. Spinney Jr. v. State of Maine, 2017 ME 9 (Me. 2017). · cites it 3× “In Spinney’s case, however, only the probation revocation resulted in a sentence, 4 and the record reveals that Spinney failed to *142 avail himself of the opportunity to seek review of that sanction through 17-A M.R.S. § 1207 (2012). 5 [¶ 9] Title 15 M.”
State v. Forbis, 856 A.2d 621 (Me. 2004). “[¶ 6] Because consideration of appeals from probation revocation decisions is a matter committed to our discretion, Forbis filed a notice of appeal and a memorandum requesting a certificate of probable cause to be allowed to present the merits of his appeal pursuant to M.”
State v. Kniffin, 604 A.2d 900 (Me. 1992). “” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1207 (1983). The scope of our review under section 1207 is not limited to the finding of violation and act of revocation by the court, as the State contends, 3 but also extends to the subsequent imposition of sentence for such violation pursuant to section…”
State of Maine v. Robert E. Power Jr., 2015 ME 40 (Me. 2015). “PER CURIAM [¶1] This appeal is before us based on a certificate of probable cause, issued pursuant to 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(2) (2014) and M.R. App.”
State v. West, 2000 ME 133 (Me. 2000). “[¶ 2] Pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1207(2) (Supp.1999), one whose probation has been revoked by the Superior Court “may not appeal as of right,” but must satisfy the requirements of M.”
Jay K. Gould v. State of Maine, 2019 ME 79 (Me. 2019). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2018). [¶2] In November 2017, Gould filed a petition for post-conviction review in the trial court asserting that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel at the probation revocation hearing.”
State v. Kibbe, 175 A.3d 653 (Me. 2017). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2016); M.R. App. 19(a)(ii) (Tower 2016); M.”
State v. Kibbe, 175 A.3d 653 (Me. 2017). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2016); M.R. App. 19(a)(ii) (Tower 2016); M.”
State v. Kibbe, 175 A.3d 653 (Me. 2017). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2016); M.R. App. 19(a)(ii) (Tower 2016); M.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1207(1) — 7 cases
Jonathan A. Petgrave v. State of Maine, 2019 ME 72 (Me. 2019). “BACKGROUND [¶2] In August 2016, after Jonathan Petgrave pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawful possession of a scheduled drug (Class B), 17-A M.R.”
Jonathan M. Spinney Jr. v. State of Maine, 2017 ME 9 (Me. 2017). “In Spinney’s case, however, only the probation revocation resulted in a sentence, 4 and the record reveals that Spinney failed to *142 avail himself of the opportunity to seek review of that sanction through 17-A M.R.S. § 1207 (2012). 5 [¶ 9] Title 15 M.”
Jay K. Gould v. State of Maine, 2019 ME 79 (Me. 2019). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2018). [¶2] In November 2017, Gould filed a petition for post-conviction review in the trial court asserting that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel at the probation revocation hearing.”
State v. Kibbe, 175 A.3d 653 (Me. 2017). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2016); M.R. App. 19(a)(ii) (Tower 2016); M.”
State v. Kibbe, 175 A.3d 653 (Me. 2017). “See 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(1) (2016); M.R. App. 19(a)(ii) (Tower 2016); M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1207(2) — 4 cases
State v. Almurshidy, 1999 ME 97 (Me. 1999). “" 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1207(2) (Supp.1998). The manner and conditions of the appeal are provided by rule.”
State v. Forbis, 856 A.2d 621 (Me. 2004). “[¶ 6] Because consideration of appeals from probation revocation decisions is a matter committed to our discretion, Forbis filed a notice of appeal and a memorandum requesting a certificate of probable cause to be allowed to present the merits of his appeal pursuant to M.”
State of Maine v. Robert E. Power Jr., 2015 ME 40 (Me. 2015). “PER CURIAM [¶1] This appeal is before us based on a certificate of probable cause, issued pursuant to 17-A M.R.S. § 1207(2) (2014) and M.R. App.”
State v. West, 2000 ME 133 (Me. 2000). “[¶ 2] Pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1207(2) (Supp.1999), one whose probation has been revoked by the Superior Court “may not appeal as of right,” but must satisfy the requirements of M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.