Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1326 (2026)

Time and method of restitution

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 455, §3 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 90 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 816, §1 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 147, §1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 502, §F16 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 790, §D6 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1979–1998 · leading case: State v. Blanchard, 409 A.2d 229 (Me. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Blanchard, 409 A.2d 229 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “§ 1325, and (2) failing to specify the time and method of payment as required in 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1326. The record, we conclude, leaves no basis for rational disagreement that the Justice failed to comply with the statutes authorizing restitution.”
State v. Berube, 1997 ME 165 (Me. 1997). · cites it 2× “Although there was a finding of partial indi-gency by the trial court in 1992, there is no other evidence in the record to support a conclusion that, at the time of his second sentencing in 1996, the restitution order in question would cause an excessive financial hardship on…”
State v. Cloutier, 646 A.2d 358 (Me. 1994). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1326 (Supp.1993). 1 In the circumstances of this case, We agree with Cloutier that restitution was improperly imposed.”
State v. Lewis, 1998 ME 83 (Me. 1998). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1326 (Supp.1997) provides in pertinent part: When restitution is authorized, the time and method of payment or of the performance of the services must be specified.”
State v. LaCasce, 512 A.2d 312 (Me. 1986). “” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1326 (1983). Joint and several liability undermines both of these statutory purposes.”
State v. La Casce, 512 A.2d 312 (Me. 1986). “" 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1326 (1983). Joint and several liability undermines both of these statutory purposes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.