Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 15-A (2026)

Issuance of summons for criminal offense

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  A law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe a crime has been or is being committed by a person may issue or have delivered a written summons to that person directing that person to appear in the appropriate trial court to answer the allegation that the person has committed the crime. The summons must include the signature of the officer, a brief description of the alleged crime, the time and place of the alleged crime and the time, place and date the person is to appear in court. The form used must be the Uniform Summons and Complaint. A person to whom a summons is issued or delivered must give a written promise to appear. If the person refuses to sign the summons after having been ordered to do so by a law enforcement officer, the person commits a Class E crime. As soon as practicable after service of the summons, the officer shall cause a copy of the summons to be filed with the court.  
[PL 2005, c. 326, §3 (AMD); PL 2005, c. 326, §5 (AFF).]
2.  Any person who a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe has committed or is committing a crime other than one listed under section 15, subsection 1, paragraph A, and to whom a law enforcement officer is authorized to deliver a summons pursuant to subsection 1, who intentionally fails or refuses to provide to that officer reasonably credible evidence of that person's correct name, address or date of birth commits a Class E crime, if the person persists in the failure or refusal after having been informed by the officer of the provisions of this subsection. If that person furnishes the officer evidence of the person's correct name, address and date of birth and the evidence does not appear to be reasonably credible, the officer shall attempt to verify the evidence as quickly as is reasonably possible. During the period the verification is being attempted, the officer may require the person to remain in the officer's presence for a period not to exceed 2 hours. During this period, if the officer reasonably believes that the officer's safety or the safety of others present requires, the officer may search for any dangerous weapon by an external patting of that person's outer clothing. If in the course of the search the officer feels an object that the officer reasonably believes to be a dangerous weapon, the officer may take such action as is necessary to examine the object, but may take permanent possession of the object only if it is subject to forfeiture. The requirement that the person remain in the presence of the officer does not constitute an arrest. After informing that person of the provisions of this subsection, the officer may arrest the person either if the person intentionally refuses to furnish any evidence of that person's correct name, address or date of birth or if, after attempting to verify the evidence as provided for in this subsection, the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has intentionally failed to provide reasonably credible evidence of the person's correct name, address or date of birth.  
[PL 2003, c. 657, §2 (AMD).]
3.  If, at any time subsequent to an arrest made pursuant to subsection 2, it appears that the evidence of the person's correct name, address and date of birth was accurate, the person must be released from custody and any record of that custody must show that the person was released for that reason. If, upon trial for violating subsection 2, a person is acquitted on the ground that the evidence of the person's correct name, address and date of birth was accurate, the record of acquittal must show that that was the ground.  
[PL 2003, c. 657, §2 (AMD).]
4.  Any person who fails to appear in court as directed by a summons served on that person pursuant to subsection 1 or to otherwise respond in accordance with law on or before the date specified in the summons commits a Class E crime. Upon that person's failure to appear or respond, the court may issue a warrant of arrest. It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this subsection that the failure to appear or respond resulted from just cause.  
[PL 1991, c. 459, §4 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 375 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 459, §4 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 657, §2 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 326, §3 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 326, §5 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: State v. Johnson, 95 A.3d 621 (Me. 2014).
State v. Johnson, 95 A.3d 621 (Me. 2014). · cites it 7× “Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction of failing to provide his correct name, address, and date of birth (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(2) (2013), possession or distribution of dangerous knives (Class D), 17-A M.”
State of Maine v. Abdiaziz Hussein, 2019 ME 74 (Me. 2019). · cites it 4× “[¶1] Abdiaziz Hussein appeals from judgments of conviction for failure to sign a criminal summons (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2018), refusing to submit to arrest by physical force (Class D), 17-A M.”
State v. Smen, 2006 ME 40 (Me. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 210(1)(A) (2005); and one count of failure to sign a uniform summons and complaint (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2005), entered in the District Court (Ellsworth, Brodrick, A.”
State of Maine v. Dmitri L. Cannady, 2018 ME 106 (Me. 2018). · cites it 2× “§ 2557-A(2)(A) (2017), and failing to give his correct name (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(2) (2017) ; 29-A M.R.S.”
State v. Ouellette, 2006 ME 81 (Me. 2006). “§ 751-A(1)(B) (2005); and refusing to sign a uniform summons and complaint (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2005), entered in the District Court (Biddeford, Kennedy, J.”
United States v. Thomas, 190 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D. Me. 2002). · cites it 3× “at 40, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 15-A(2). After another Auburn Police Officer, Stephen Burns, arrived on the scene, Lt.”
State of Maine v. Aaron Lowden, 2014 ME 142 (Me. 2014). “§ 1092(1)(A) (2013), and one count of refusing to sign a criminal summons (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2013), by two complaints in District Court (Springvale).”
State v. Prior, 662 A.2d 225 (Me. 1995). “§ 7801(9) (1994), failure to sign a summons, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 15-A (1994), and failure to obey an order of the harbormaster, 38 M.”
State of Maine v. Joshua Martin, 2026 ME 24 (Me. 2026). · cites it 3× “§ 1107-A(1)(C) (2025); failure to provide a correct name, address, and date of birth (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(2) (2025); violation of a condition of release (Class E), 15 M.”
Small v. Smith (D. Me. 2025). “Compare 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (“A law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe a crime has been or is being committed by a person may issue .”
State v. Hillsgrove, 658 A.2d 1100 (Me. 1995). “In 1987 and 1991, the legislature enacted and amended 17-A M.R.S.A. § 15-A(1) (Supp.1994). The statute provides in pertinent part: A law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe a crime has been or is being committed by a person may issue or have delivered a written…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 15-A(1) — 6 cases
State of Maine v. Abdiaziz Hussein, 2019 ME 74 (Me. 2019). “[¶1] Abdiaziz Hussein appeals from judgments of conviction for failure to sign a criminal summons (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2018), refusing to submit to arrest by physical force (Class D), 17-A M.”
State v. Smen, 2006 ME 40 (Me. 2006). “§ 210(1)(A) (2005); and one count of failure to sign a uniform summons and complaint (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2005), entered in the District Court (Ellsworth, Brodrick, A.”
State v. Ouellette, 2006 ME 81 (Me. 2006). “§ 751-A(1)(B) (2005); and refusing to sign a uniform summons and complaint (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2005), entered in the District Court (Biddeford, Kennedy, J.”
State of Maine v. Aaron Lowden, 2014 ME 142 (Me. 2014). “§ 1092(1)(A) (2013), and one count of refusing to sign a criminal summons (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (2013), by two complaints in District Court (Springvale).”
Small v. Smith (D. Me. 2025). “Compare 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(1) (“A law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe a crime has been or is being committed by a person may issue .”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 15-A(2) — 4 cases
State v. Johnson, 95 A.3d 621 (Me. 2014). “Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction of failing to provide his correct name, address, and date of birth (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(2) (2013), possession or distribution of dangerous knives (Class D), 17-A M.”
State of Maine v. Dmitri L. Cannady, 2018 ME 106 (Me. 2018). “§ 2557-A(2)(A) (2017), and failing to give his correct name (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(2) (2017) ; 29-A M.R.S.”
United States v. Thomas, 190 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D. Me. 2002). “at 40, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 15-A(2). After another Auburn Police Officer, Stephen Burns, arrived on the scene, Lt.”
State of Maine v. Joshua Martin, 2026 ME 24 (Me. 2026). “§ 1107-A(1)(C) (2025); failure to provide a correct name, address, and date of birth (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 15-A(2) (2025); violation of a condition of release (Class E), 15 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.