Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 19

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316

Support guidelines

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1989, c. 834, §A (NEW). PL 1991, c. 840, §3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 694, §A5 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 694, §B1 (RP). PL 1995, c. 694, §E2 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1991–2000 · leading case: Melanson v. Belyea
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Melanson v. Belyea (1997) me · cites it 4× “19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1). The relevant definitional section requires that support be ordered for children who are below age 19 but still attending secondary school: Twelve through 17 years; between the ages of 12 and 18 years.”
Fowler v. Fowler (1997) me · cites it 5× “19 M.R.SA § 316(2) & (3). Although the amount so calculated is presumed to be correct, see 19 M.”
Department of Human Services v. Hager (2000) me · cites it 5× “See 19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1) (Supp.1993) (making the support obligation dependent on the annual gross income of the parents); see also 19 M.”
Glew v. Glew (1999) me “Second, given that the child support guidelines take into consideration the age of the child, each parent’s income, and the parents’ combined incomes, a determination of child support payments based on these factors does not violate public policy by focusing exclusively on the…”
Adam Mushero, Etc. v. H. Rollin Ives, Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services (1991) ca1 · cites it 2× “19 M.R.S.A. § 316. In addition, under the guidelines, a court or hearing officer can consider the special financial circumstances of a parent in determining that parent’s responsibility.”
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc (1991) me · cites it 2× “” The support guidelines provide the formula for computing the parental support obligation, 19 M.R.S.A. § 316, and include a presumption that the primary residential care provider spends his or her share directly on the child.”
Department of Human Services v. Monty (1998) me “19 M.R.S.A. § 316(3). “Gross income” is defined as follows: 5.”
Hedrich v. Hedrich (1998) me “[¶ 6] Calculation of child support amounts, for purposes of this case, was governed by 19 M.R.S.A. § 316 (Pamph.1996), repealed by P.”
Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Young v. Leifester (1998) me “See 19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1), (1-A) (Pamph.1996) (current version at 19-A M.”
Redmond v. Magoon (1992) me “Both Magoon and Redmond, therefore, were free to address the issue of the tax dependent status of the children at the hearing on Redmond’s motion.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(1) — 3 cases
Melanson v. Belyea (1997) me “19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1). The relevant definitional section requires that support be ordered for children who are below age 19 but still attending secondary school: Twelve through 17 years; between the ages of 12 and 18 years.”
Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Young v. Leifester (1998) me “See 19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1), (1-A) (Pamph.1996) (current version at 19-A M.”
Department of Human Services v. Hager (2000) me “See 19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1) (Supp.1993) (making the support obligation dependent on the annual gross income of the parents); see also 19 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(2) — 1 case
Fowler v. Fowler (1997) me “19 M.R.SA § 316(2) & (3). Although the amount so calculated is presumed to be correct, see 19 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(3) — 3 cases
Department of Human Services v. Hager (2000) me “See 19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1) (Supp.1993) (making the support obligation dependent on the annual gross income of the parents); see also 19 M.”
Department of Human Services v. Monty (1998) me “19 M.R.S.A. § 316(3). “Gross income” is defined as follows: 5.”
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc (1991) me “” The support guidelines provide the formula for computing the parental support obligation, 19 M.R.S.A. § 316, and include a presumption that the primary residential care provider spends his or her share directly on the child.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(4) — 2 cases
Melanson v. Belyea (1997) me “19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1). The relevant definitional section requires that support be ordered for children who are below age 19 but still attending secondary school: Twelve through 17 years; between the ages of 12 and 18 years.”
Fowler v. Fowler (1997) me “19 M.R.SA § 316(2) & (3). Although the amount so calculated is presumed to be correct, see 19 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(4)(A) — 2 cases
Fowler v. Fowler (1997) me “19 M.R.SA § 316(2) & (3). Although the amount so calculated is presumed to be correct, see 19 M.”
Department of Human Services v. Hager (2000) me “See 19 M.R.S.A. § 316(1) (Supp.1993) (making the support obligation dependent on the annual gross income of the parents); see also 19 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(4)(C) — 2 cases
Adam Mushero, Etc. v. H. Rollin Ives, Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services (1991) ca1 “19 M.R.S.A. § 316. In addition, under the guidelines, a court or hearing officer can consider the special financial circumstances of a parent in determining that parent’s responsibility.”
Fowler v. Fowler (1997) me “19 M.R.SA § 316(2) & (3). Although the amount so calculated is presumed to be correct, see 19 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 316(7)(F) — 1 case
Fowler v. Fowler (1997) me “19 M.R.SA § 316(2) & (3). Although the amount so calculated is presumed to be correct, see 19 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.