Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19-A, § 1735 (2026)

International application of chapter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Foreign country treated as a state.  A court of this State shall treat a foreign country as if it were a state of the United States for the purpose of applying this subchapter and subchapter II.  
[PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW); PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).]
2.  Recognition and enforcement of foreign determination.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, a child custody determination made in a foreign country under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under subchapter III.  
[PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW); PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).]
3.  Application not required.  A court of this State need not apply this chapter if the child custody law of a foreign country violates fundamental principles of human rights.  
[PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW); PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW). PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Christopher SEEKINS v. Jennifer HAMM, 2015 ME 157 (Me. 2015).
Christopher SEEKINS v. Jennifer HAMM, 2015 ME 157 (Me. 2015). · cites it 2× “, included with 19-A M.R.S.A. § 1735 (2012). There is no indication in the record that the child custody laws of Guatemala violate fundamental principles of human rights; indeed, the Hague Convention has been in force between Guatemala and the United States since January 1, 2008.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19-A, § 1735(1) — 1 case
Christopher SEEKINS v. Jennifer HAMM, 2015 ME 157 (Me. 2015). “, included with 19-A M.R.S.A. § 1735 (2012). There is no indication in the record that the child custody laws of Guatemala violate fundamental principles of human rights; indeed, the Hague Convention has been in force between Guatemala and the United States since January 1, 2008.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.