Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19-A, § 1747 (2026)

Jurisdiction to modify determination

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as otherwise provided in section 1748, a court of this State may not modify a child custody determination made by a court of another state unless a court of this State has jurisdiction to make an initial determination under section 1745, subsection 1, paragraph A or B and:   [PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW); PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).]
1.  Jurisdiction of other state; more convenient forum.  The court of the other state determines it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under section 1746 or that a court of this State would be a more convenient forum under section 1751; or  
[PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW); PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).]
2.  Not residents of other state.  A court of this State or a court of the other state determines that the child, the child's parents and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in the other state.  
[PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW); PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1999, c. 486, §3 (NEW). PL 1999, c. 486, §6 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Jaclyn E. Papadopoulos v. Brandon L. Phillips, 2018 ME 74 (Me. 2018).
Jaclyn E. Papadopoulos v. Brandon L. Phillips, 2018 ME 74 (Me. 2018). “2 2 Pursuant to 19-A M.R.S. § 1747 (2017), the Maine District Court had jurisdiction to modify the child custody determination.”
Papadopoulos v. Phillips, 186 A.3d 852 (Me. 2018). “Contrary to her contention, the court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to speak with the child privately and would not allow the child to testify as a witness with only Phillips's attorney present.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.