Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 307 (2026)

Review process

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 687, §1 (NEW). PL 1981, c. 705, §§V20-V29 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 722 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 812, §115 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 342 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 418, §§7-10 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 443, §1 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 661, §3 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 737, §§A48,49 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 503, §B79 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 410, §FF2 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 696, §§A20-24 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 689, §§B21,22 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 689, §C2 (AFF). PL 2001, c. 664, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1981–2005 · leading case: Bradbury Mem'l Nursing Home v. Tall Pines Manor Assocs., 485 A.2d 634 (Me. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bradbury Mem'l Nursing Home v. Tall Pines Manor Assocs., 485 A.2d 634 (Me. 1984). · cites it 12× “22 M.R.S.A. § 307(5-A) (Supp. 1984-1985).”
Hale v. Petit, 438 A.2d 226 (Me. 1981). · cites it 5× “Under the review process set forth in 22 M.R.S.A. § 307 and the Procedural Manual of the *229 Department, the Department renders a decision as to the issuance of a certificate of need after considering the recommendation of the MHSA.”
York Hosp. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 2005 ME 41 (Me. 2005). · cites it 2× “” 22 M.R.S.A. § 307(5-A)(C)(1). Electronic mail communications are correspondence more similar to a letter than a telephone conversation and would ordinarily be included in the record if such communications carried substantive information.”
Magnetic Resonance Tech. of Maine Ltd. P'ship v. Comm'r, Maine Dep't of Human Servs., 652 A.2d 655 (Me. 1995). · cites it 4× “22 M.R.S.A. § 307(5-A)(B). The “informational record developed in the course of review” is defined in 22 M.”
Magnetic Resonance v. DEPT. OF HUM. SER., 652 A.2d 655 (Me. 1995). · cites it 4× “22 M.R.S.A. § 307(5-A)(B). The "informational record developed in the course of review" is defined in 22 M.”
St. Joseph Hosp. v. Concannon, Comm'r, Maine Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2001). · cites it 16× “his court to order the respondent, Kevin Concannon, Commissioner of the Department of Human Services ("commissioner,” “the department," or "DHS", to issue a decision on the petitioner's amended application for a Certificate of Need ("CON") without further delay and without the…”
Cent. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Concannon (Me. Super. Ct 2000). · cites it 2× “22 M.R.S.A. § 307 2-B (G). CMMC filed the present petition five days later.”
Portland Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Comm'r, Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2004). “Formerly, 22 M.R.SA. §307(3). The “Public necessity” provisions were added when the CON statute was reenacted as the Maine Certificate of Need Act of 2002.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 307(2) — 1 case
Hale v. Petit, 438 A.2d 226 (Me. 1981). “Under the review process set forth in 22 M.R.S.A. § 307 and the Procedural Manual of the *229 Department, the Department renders a decision as to the issuance of a certificate of need after considering the recommendation of the MHSA.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 307(3) — 4 cases
Bradbury Mem'l Nursing Home v. Tall Pines Manor Assocs., 485 A.2d 634 (Me. 1984). “22 M.R.S.A. § 307(5-A) (Supp. 1984-1985).”
Hale v. Petit, 438 A.2d 226 (Me. 1981). “Under the review process set forth in 22 M.R.S.A. § 307 and the Procedural Manual of the *229 Department, the Department renders a decision as to the issuance of a certificate of need after considering the recommendation of the MHSA.”
St. Joseph Hosp. v. Concannon, Comm'r, Maine Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2001). “his court to order the respondent, Kevin Concannon, Commissioner of the Department of Human Services ("commissioner,” “the department," or "DHS", to issue a decision on the petitioner's amended application for a Certificate of Need ("CON") without further delay and without the…”
Portland Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Comm'r, Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2004). “Formerly, 22 M.R.SA. §307(3). The “Public necessity” provisions were added when the CON statute was reenacted as the Maine Certificate of Need Act of 2002.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 307(6) — 1 case
Hale v. Petit, 438 A.2d 226 (Me. 1981). “Under the review process set forth in 22 M.R.S.A. § 307 and the Procedural Manual of the *229 Department, the Department renders a decision as to the issuance of a certificate of need after considering the recommendation of the MHSA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.