Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 24-A, § 2715 (2026)

Legal actions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There shall be a provision as follows:

Legal actions: No action at law or in equity shall be brought to recover on this policy prior to the expiration of sixty days after written proof of loss has been furnished in accordance with the requirements of this policy. No such action shall be brought after the expiration of 3 years after the time written proof of loss is required to be furnished.

[PL 1969, c. 132, §1 (NEW).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1969, c. 132, §1 (NEW).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2003 · leading case: Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Grp. Long Term Disability Ins. Prog. Reliance Stand. Life Ins. Co., 222 F.3d 643 (9th Cir. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Grp. Long Term Disability Ins. Prog. Reliance Stand. Life Ins. Co., 222 F.3d 643 (9th Cir. 2000). “18-070(7); Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit. 24-A, § 2715; Mass.”

Furleigh v. Allied Grp. Inc., 281 F. Supp. 2d 952 (N.D. Iowa 2003). “1998) (characterizing 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2715 as a statute of limitations in determining that there was no equitable basis to halt the running of the limitations period); Hofkin v.”

McLaughlin v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 224 F. Supp. 2d 283 (D. Me. 2002). “1998) (characterizing 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2715 as a statute of limitations in determining that there was no equitable basis to halt the running of the limitations period); Hofkin v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.