Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 26
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 626 (2026)

Cessation of employment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An employee leaving employment must be paid in full no later than the employee's next established payday. Any overcompensation may be withheld if authorized under section 635 and any loan or advance against future earnings or wages may be deducted if evidenced by a statement in writing signed by the employee. Whenever the terms of employment or the employer's established practice includes provisions for paid vacations, vacation pay on cessation of employment has the same status as wages earned. All unused paid vacation accrued pursuant to the employer's vacation policy on and after January 1, 2023 must be paid to the employee on cessation of employment unless the employee is employed by an employer with 10 or fewer employees or by a public employer. If the employee’s employment is governed by a collective bargaining agreement that includes provisions addressing payment of vacation pay upon cessation of employment, the collective bargaining agreement supersedes this paragraph.   [PL 2021, c. 561, §1 (AMD).]
For purposes of this section, the term "employee" means any person who performs services for another in return for compensation, but does not include an independent contractor.   [PL 1991, c. 162 (NEW).]
For purposes of this subchapter, a reasonable time means the earlier of either the next day on which employees would regularly be paid or a day not more than 2 weeks after the day on which the demand is made.   [PL 1991, c. 162 (AMD).]
In any action for unpaid wages brought under this subchapter, the employer may not deduct as a setoff or counterclaim any money allegedly due the employer as compensation for damages caused to the employer's property by the employee, or any money allegedly owed to the employer by the employee, notwithstanding any procedural rules regarding counteractions, provided that any overcompensation may be withheld if authorized under section 635 and any loan or advance against future earnings or wages may be deducted if evidenced by a statement in writing signed by the employee, and that nothing in this section may be construed to limit or restrict in any way any rights that the employer has to recover, by a separate legal action, any money owed the employer by the employee.   [PL 1991, c. 162 (AMD).]
An action for unpaid wages under this section may be brought by the affected employee or employees or by the Department of Labor on behalf of the employee or employees. An employer found in violation of this section is liable for the amount of unpaid wages and all accrued vacation pay that must be paid to the employee or employees on cessation of employment pursuant to this section. In addition, the judgment rendered in favor of the employee or employees must include a reasonable rate of interest, an additional amount equal to twice the amount of those unpaid wages and that accrued vacation pay as liquidated damages and costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.   [PL 2021, c. 561, §2 (AMD).]
Within 2 weeks after the sale of a business, the seller of the business shall pay employees of that business any wages earned while employed by the seller. If the terms of employment or the employer's established practice includes provisions for paid vacations, vacation pay on cessation of employment has the same status as wages earned. All unused paid vacation accrued pursuant to the employer's vacation policy on and after January 1, 2023 must be paid to the employees on cessation of employment unless the employer has 10 or fewer employees or is a public employer. If the employees' employment is governed by a collective bargaining agreement that includes provisions addressing payment of vacation pay upon cessation of employment, the collective bargaining agreement supersedes this paragraph. The seller of a business may comply with the provisions of this paragraph through a specific agreement with the buyer in which the buyer agrees to pay any wages earned by employees through employment with the seller and to honor any paid vacation earned under the seller's vacation policy.   [PL 2021, c. 561, §3 (AMD).]
For the purposes of this section, "public employer" means the State, a county, a municipality, the University of Maine System, the Maine Community College System, a school administrative unit and any other political body or its political or administrative subdivision.   [PL 2021, c. 561, §4 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 113, §4 (RPR). PL 1975, c. 623, §§37-A,37-B (AMD). PL 1983, c. 652, §1 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 162 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 580, §1 (AMD). PL 2017, c. 219, §§11, 12 (AMD). PL 2021, c. 561, §§1-4 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 98 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Marston v. Newavom, 629 A.2d 587 (Me. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marston v. Newavom, 629 A.2d 587 (Me. 1993). · cites it 14× “) entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Jane Marston on her slander action and on her claim for wrongfully withheld wages pursuant to 26 M.R.S.A. § 626 (1988). On appeal defendants contend that (1) plaintiff is not an "employee" covered by 26 M.”
Michael Dinan v. Alpha Networks Inc., 2013 ME 22 (Me. 2013). · cites it 9× “25: “Does Maine’s Timely and Full Payment of Wages Law, 26 M.R.S. § 626, apply to the reasonable value of an employee’s services under quantum meruit?” Dinan v.”
In Re Wage Payment Litig., 2000 ME 162 (Me. 2000). · cites it 4× “See 26 M.R.S.A. § 626 (1988 & Supp.1999). Under section 626, "[a]n employee leaving employment must be paid in full within a reasonable time after demand at the office of the employer where payrolls are kept and wages are paid.”
Richardson v. Winthrop Sch. Dep't, 2009 ME 109 (Me. 2009). · cites it 4× “*402 [¶ 4] On November 13, 2008, Richardson filed a complaint against the Department in the Superior Court for unpaid vacation time pursuant to 26 M.R.S. § 626 (2008). On February 18, 2009, the court granted the Department’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon…”
Rowell v. Jones & Vining, Inc., 524 A.2d 1208 (Me. 1987). · cites it 7× “The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendant under the provisions of 26 M.R.S.A. §§ 626 and 626-A for vacation pay accrued and payable, and costs of suit including attorney’s fees and interest.”
Burke v. Port Resort Realty Corp., 1999 ME 138 (Me. 1999). · cites it 9× “The court ruled that Port Resort: (1) breached its employment agreement with Burke; (2) violated 26 M.R.S.A. § 626 (Supp.1998); and (3) was subject to the statutory damages and forfeitures authorized by 26 M.”
Madore v. Kennebec Heights Country Club, 926 A.2d 1180 (Me. 2007). · cites it 5× “Madore cross-appeals, contending that the court erred in finding that he was not entitled to the additional remedies of Maine’s wage payment statute, 26 M.R.S. § 626 (2006). We find the Club’s contentions to be without merit.”
Ingram v. Rencor Controls, Inc., 256 F. Supp. 2d 12 (D. Me. 2003). · cites it 5× “Count III asserts a claim for unpaid compensation under 26 M.R.S.A. § 626, and Count IV asserts a promissory estoppel claim.”
Dinan v. Alpha Networks Inc., 857 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D. Me. 2012). · cites it 19× “The Court concludes that it is unclear whether Maine’s Timely and Full Payment of Wages Law, 26 M.R.S. § 626, applies to the reasonable value of an employee’s services under quantum meruit.”
Avery v. Kennebec Millwork, Inc., 861 A.2d 634 (Me. 2004). · cites it 4× “2003), and for unpaid vacation time pursuant to 26 M.R.S.A. § 626 (Supp.2003). At trial, a primary contested issue was whether Maine’s minimum wage statute, 26 M.”
Learnard v. Inhabitants of Town of Van Buren, 164 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Me. 2001). · cites it 5× “Plaintiffs Request for Relief Pursuant to 26 M.R.S.A. § 626 Also as part of Count I, Plaintiff requests relief pursuant to a Maine statute, 26 M.”
Officemax Inc. v. Sousa, 773 F. Supp. 2d 190 (D. Me. 2011). · cites it 5× “Violation of the Maine Timely and Full Payment of Wages Law John Steele’s final claim relating to OfficeMax’s actions under its compensation plan is brought under the Maine Timely and Full Payment of Wages Law, 26 M.R.S. §§ 626 and 626-A. Section 626 requires that “[a]n employee…”
Show all 98 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.