Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 1909 (2026)

Registration lamp

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A vehicle must have a white light capable of illuminating the rear registration plate so that the characters on the plate are visible for a distance of at least 50 feet. This section does not apply to unregistered farm tractors or vehicles with valid temporary plates issued by licensed car dealers.   [PL 2021, c. 216, §45 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1993, c. 683, §A2 (NEW). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF). PL 2021, c. 216, §45 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: State v. Taylor, 1997 ME 81 (Me. 1997).
State v. Taylor, 1997 ME 81 (Me. 1997). “” (repealed and replaced by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 1909 (1996) (effective Jan.”
State of Maine v. Nicholas P. Lovejoy, 2024 ME 42 (Me. 2024). · cites it 2× “See 29-A M.R.S. § 1909 (2018)5 (“A vehicle must have a white light capable of illuminating the rear registration plate so that the characters on the plate are visible for a distance of at least 50 feet.”
State of Maine v. Boutin (Me. Super. Ct 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 1909 when Officer Heath saw the Defendant driving without visible rear plate lights.”
State of Maine v. Lovejoy (Me. Super. Ct 2022). · cites it 2× “Title 29-A M.R.S. § 1909 provides: A vehicle must have a white light capable of illuminating the rear registration plate so that the characters on the plate are visible for a distance of at least 50 feet.”
State of Maine v. Cayford (Me. Super. Ct 2022). · cites it 2× “The stated reason for the stop was Officer Heath's observation that the right-sided license plate light on the Mustang was not illuminated, and therefore the vehicle had a defect and was in violation of 29-A M.R.S. § 1909. At hearing, Officer Heath confirmed that the left-sided…”
State of Maine v. McCracken (Me. Super. Ct 2010). · cites it 2× “29-A M.R.S.A. § 1909. 1 Failing to illuminate a registration plate is also a serious safety concern as evidenced by the law and the fact that it is an inspection violation.”
State of Maine v. Jusko (Me. Super. Ct 2021). “" 29-A M.R.S. § 1909 (in pertinent part). Further, Maine law states a violation of this section constitutes a traffic infraction.”
State of Maine v. Morris (Me. Super. Ct 2022). “Before exiting 1-295, Agent Warren noticed and reported that one of the rear registration lamps was out, in violation of29-A M.R.S. § 1909. After turning left on Westbrook Street, the vehicle made a right on Broadway Street, a main throughway in South Portland that offered…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.