Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411 (2026)

Criminal OUI

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Offense. 
[PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. Q, §77 (RP); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).]
1-A.  Offense.  A person commits OUI if that person:  
A. Operates a motor vehicle:  
(1) While under the influence of intoxicants; or  
(2) While having an alcohol level of 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath;   [PL 2009, c. 447, §37 (AMD).]
B. Violates paragraph A and:  
(1) Has one previous OUI offense within a 10-year period;  
(2) Has 2 previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period; or  
(3) Has 3 or more previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period;   [PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. Q, §78 (NEW); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).]
C. Violates paragraph A, failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer and:  
(1) Has no previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period;  
(2) Has one previous OUI offense within a 10-year period;  
(3) Has 2 previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period; or  
(4) Has 3 previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period; or   [PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. Q, §78 (NEW); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).]
D. Violates paragraph A, B or C and:  
(1) In fact causes serious bodily injury as defined in Title 17‑A, section 2, subsection 23 to another person;  
(1-A) In fact causes the death of another person; or  
(2) Has either a prior conviction for a Class B or Class C crime under this section or former Title 29, section 1312‑B or a prior criminal homicide conviction involving or resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs or with an alcohol level of 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath. For purposes of this subparagraph, the 10-year limitation specified in section 2402 and Title 17‑A, section 9‑A, subsection 3 does not apply to the prior criminal homicide conviction or to a prior conviction for a Class B or Class C crime under this section or former Title 29, section 1312‑B. The convictions may have occurred at any time.   [RR 2015, c. 2, §18 (COR).]
[RR 2015, c. 2, §18 (COR).]
2.  Pleading and proof.  The alternatives outlined in subsection 1‑A, paragraph A may be pleaded in the alternative. The State is not required to elect between the alternatives prior to submission to the fact finder. In a prosecution under subsection 1‑A, paragraph D, the State need not prove that the defendant's condition of being under the influence of intoxicants or having an alcohol level of 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath caused the serious bodily injury or death alleged. The State must prove only that the defendant's operation caused the serious bodily injury or death. The court shall apply Title 17‑A, section 33 in assessing any causation under this section.  
[PL 2009, c. 447, §39 (AMD).]
3.  Investigation.  After a person has been charged with OUI, the officer shall investigate whether the charged person has prior OUI offenses. As part of the investigation, the officer shall make necessary inquiries of the Secretary of State.  
[PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).]
4.  Arrest.  A law enforcement officer may arrest, without a warrant, a person the officer has probable cause to believe has operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicants if the arrest occurs within a period following the offense reasonably likely to result in the obtaining of probative evidence of an alcohol level or the presence of a drug or drug metabolite.  
[PL 2013, c. 459, §2 (AMD).]
5.  Penalties.  Except as otherwise provided in this section and section 2508, violation of this section is a Class D crime, which is a strict liability crime as defined in Title 17‑A, section 34, subsection 4‑A. The following minimum penalties apply and may not be suspended:  
A. For a person having no previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period:  
(1) A fine of not less than $500, except that if the person failed to submit to a test, a fine of not less than $600;  
(2) A court-ordered suspension of a driver's license for a period of 150 days; and  
(3) A period of incarceration as follows:  
(a) Not less than 48 hours when the person:  
(i) Was tested as having an alcohol level of 0.15 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath;  
(ii) Was exceeding the speed limit by 30 miles per hour or more;  
(iii) Eluded or attempted to elude an officer; or  
(iv) Was operating with a passenger under 21 years of age; and  
(b) Not less than 96 hours when the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer;   [PL 2013, c. 389, §1 (AMD); PL 2013, c. 389, §7 (AFF).]
B. For a person having one previous OUI offense within a 10-year period:  
(1) A fine of not less than $700, except that if the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer, a fine of not less than $900;  
(2) A period of incarceration of not less than 7 days, except that if the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer, a period of incarceration of not less than 12 days;  
(3) A court-ordered suspension of a driver's license for a period of 3 years; and  
(4) In accordance with section 2416, a court-ordered suspension of the person's right to register a motor vehicle;   [PL 2007, c. 531, §2 (AMD); PL 2007, c. 531, §10 (AFF).]
C. For a person having 2 previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period, which is a Class C crime:  
(1) A fine of not less than $1,100, except that if the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer, a fine of not less than $1,400;  
(2) A period of incarceration of not less than 30 days, except that if the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer, a period of incarceration of not less than 40 days;  
(3) A court-ordered suspension of a driver's license for a period of 6 years; and  
(4) In accordance with section 2416, a court-ordered suspension of the person's right to register a motor vehicle;   [PL 2007, c. 531, §2 (AMD); PL 2007, c. 531, §10 (AFF).]
D. For a person having 3 or more previous OUI offenses within a 10-year period, which is a Class C crime:  
(1) A fine of not less than $2,100, except that if the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer, a fine of not less than $2,500;  
(2) A period of incarceration of not less than 6 months, except that if the person failed to submit to a test at the request of a law enforcement officer, a period of incarceration of not less than 6 months and 20 days;  
(3) A court-ordered suspension of a driver's license for a period of 8 years; and  
(4) In accordance with section 2416, a court-ordered suspension of the person's right to register a motor vehicle;   [PL 2013, c. 187, §1 (AMD).]
D-1. A violation of subsection 1‑A, paragraph D, subparagraph (1) is a Class C crime, which is a strict liability crime as defined in Title 17‑A, section 34, subsection 4‑A. The sentence must include a period of incarceration of not less than 6 months, a fine of not less than $2,100 and a court-ordered suspension of a driver's license for a period of 6 years. These penalties may not be suspended;   [PL 2005, c. 606, Pt. A, §2 (AMD).]
D-2. A violation of subsection 1‑A, paragraph D, subparagraph (1‑A) or (2) is a Class B crime, which is a strict liability crime as defined in Title 17‑A, section 34, subsection 4‑A. The sentence must include a period of incarceration of not less than 6 months, a fine of not less than $2,100 and a court-ordered suspension of a driver's license for a period of 10 years. These penalties may not be suspended;   [PL 2005, c. 606, Pt. A, §3 (NEW).]
E. If a law enforcement officer failed to provide the warnings required by section 2521, subsection 3, the increase in minimum penalties required because of a refusal to submit to a test is not mandatory;   [PL 1997, c. 737, §9 (AMD).]
F. For a person sentenced under paragraph B, C or D, the court shall order the defendant to participate in the alcohol and other drug program of the Department of Health and Human Services. The court may waive the program pursuant to Title 5, section 20073‑B, if the court finds that the defendant has completed an alcohol or other drug treatment program subsequent to the date of the offense; and   [PL 2011, c. 657, Pt. AA, §78 (AMD).]
G. The court shall order an additional period of license suspension of 275 days for a person sentenced under paragraph A, B, C, D, D‑1 or D‑2 if the person was operating the motor vehicle at the time of the offense with a passenger under 21 years of age.   [PL 2005, c. 606, Pt. A, §4 (AMD).]
[PL 2013, c. 187, §1 (AMD); PL 2013, c. 389, §1 (AMD); PL 2013, c. 389, §7 (AFF).]
5-A.  Notice.  The court shall give notice of a license suspension.  
[PL 2025, c. 173, §20 (AMD).]
5-B.  Additional period of suspension.  The Secretary of State may impose an additional period of suspension under section 2451, subsection 3 or may extend a period of suspension until satisfaction of any conditions imposed pursuant to chapter 23, subchapter III, article 4.  
[PL 1995, c. 368, Pt. AAA, §9 (NEW).]
6.  Aggravated punishment category. 
[PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. Q, §83 (RP); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).]
7.  Surcharge.  A surcharge must be charged for a conviction under this section. The surcharge is $30, except that, when the person operated or attempted to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs or a combination of liquor and drugs, the surcharge is $125. For the purposes of collection procedures, the surcharge is considered a fine. Notwithstanding section 2602, this surcharge accrues to the Highway Fund for the purpose of covering the costs associated with the administration and analysis of alcohol level tests.  
[PL 2009, c. 447, §42 (AMD).]
8.  Juvenile crime.  References in this Title to this section include the juvenile crime in Title 15, section 3103, subsection 1, paragraph A for conduct that, if committed by an adult, would be considered criminal under this section, and the disposition, including a suspension, for that juvenile crime in Title 15, section 3314, subsection 3‑C, except as otherwise provided or except where the context clearly requires otherwise.  
[PL 2025, c. 431, §27 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1993, c. 683, §A2 (NEW). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF). PL 1995, c. 65, §A115 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 65, §§A153,C15 (AFF). PL 1995, c. 368, §§AAA7-10 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 645, §B18 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 737, §§8-11 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 703, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 332, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 511, §3 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 452, §§Q77-83 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 452, §X2 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 633, §8 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 673, §§TT3,4 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §B6 (REV). PL 2005, c. 397, §§B7,8 (AFF). PL 2005, c. 438, §1 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 606, §§A1-4 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 531, §2 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 531, §10 (AFF). PL 2009, c. 447, §§37-42 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 81, §1 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 159, §1 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 657, Pt. AA, §78 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 187, §1 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 389, §1 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 389, §7 (AFF). PL 2013, c. 459, §2 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 604, §2 (AMD). RR 2015, c. 2, §18 (COR). PL 2017, c. 99, §1 (AMD). PL 2025, c. 173, §20 (AMD). PL 2025, c. 431, §27 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 234 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). · cites it 20× “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State of Maine v. Troy D. Hastey, 2018 ME 147 (Me. 2018). · cites it 19× “Hastey was indicted for aggravated criminal OUI (Class B), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(2) (2017). 1 The enhancing factor alleged in the indictment is Hastey's 1991 manslaughter conviction that the State alleges "involve[ed] or result[ed] from the operation of a motor vehicle…”
State v. Stevens, 2007 ME 5 (Me. 2007). · cites it 12× “Stevens’s motion to dismiss the indictment charging him with criminal OUI (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(2), (5)(D-1) (2005).”
State of Maine v. Andrew B. Bean, 2018 ME 58 (Me. 2018). · cites it 8× “§ 393(1)(A-1), criminal OUI (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), as the right to argue for a more favorable sentence, which preserves the right to seek discretionary review—should be disclosed and recorded.”
State v. Hurd, 2010 ME 118 (Me. 2010). · cites it 10× “Hurd appeals from a judgment of conviction of aggravated operating under the influence (OUI) (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(1) (2007 & 2009), [1] entered in the Superior Court (Franklin County, Murphy, J.”
State v. Connor, 2009 ME 91 (Me. 2009). · cites it 6× “) on a complaint for operating under *1004 the influence of intoxicants (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(A), (5)(A)(3)(a)(i) (2007).”
State v. Watson, 2006 ME 80 (Me. 2006). · cites it 6× “§ 2411(1) has since been repealed by P.L.”
State v. Sawyer, 2001 ME 88 (Me. 2001). · cites it 4× “[¶ 4] Sawyer was charged with criminal OUI pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411 (1996), [2] and pleaded not guilty.”
State of Maine v. John M. Burbank, 2019 ME 37 (Me. 2019). · cites it 6× “) after Burbank entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to each charge, see M.”
State of Maine v. Richard Griffin, 2017 ME 79 (Me. 2017). · cites it 6× “Driving while intoxicated, Griffin crashed his truck, drawing a response from the Brunswick Police Department, and resulting in a charge of operating under the influence (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(A) (2016). After a bench trial, the court (Cumberland County, Wheeler, J.”
State v. Cain, 888 A.2d 276 (Me. 2006). · cites it 10× “Cain argues that the court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by sentencing him beyond the mandatory minimum penalties prescribed by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411. Finding no Sixth Amendment violation, we affirm the judgment.”
State v. Cheney, 55 A.3d 473 (Me. 2012). · cites it 4× “§ 203(1)(A) (2011); aggravated criminal operating under the influence (Class B), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(1-A) (2011); aggravated leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident (Class C), 29-A M.”
Show all 234 citing cases →
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(1) — 29 cases
State v. Watson, 2006 ME 80 (Me. 2006). “§ 2411(1) has since been repealed by P.L.”
State v. Patterson, 2005 ME 26 (Me. 2005).
State v. Stade, 683 A.2d 164 (Me. 1996).
State v. Melanson, 2002 ME 145 (Me. 2002).
State v. Horr, 2003 ME 110 (Me. 2003).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(1)(A) — 1 case
State v. Trusiani, 2004 ME 107 (Me. 2004).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(1)(B) — 3 cases
State v. Caswell, 2001 ME 23 (Me. 2001).
State v. Pelletier, 2001 ME 173 (Me. 2001).
State v. Shofner, 731 A.2d 853 (Me. 1999).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(4) — 2 cases
State v. Boyd, 156 A.3d 748 (Me. 2017).
State of Maine v. Robert I. Boyd Jr., 2017 ME 36 (Me. 2017).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5) — 14 cases
State v. Connor, 2009 ME 91 (Me. 2009). “) on a complaint for operating under *1004 the influence of intoxicants (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(A), (5)(A)(3)(a)(i) (2007).”
State of Maine v. Troy D. Hastey, 2018 ME 147 (Me. 2018). “Hastey was indicted for aggravated criminal OUI (Class B), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(2) (2017). 1 The enhancing factor alleged in the indictment is Hastey's 1991 manslaughter conviction that the State alleges "involve[ed] or result[ed] from the operation of a motor vehicle…”
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State of Maine v. Richard Griffin, 2017 ME 79 (Me. 2017). “Driving while intoxicated, Griffin crashed his truck, drawing a response from the Brunswick Police Department, and resulting in a charge of operating under the influence (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(A) (2016). After a bench trial, the court (Cumberland County, Wheeler, J.”
State v. Cain, 888 A.2d 276 (Me. 2006). “Cain argues that the court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by sentencing him beyond the mandatory minimum penalties prescribed by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411. Finding no Sixth Amendment violation, we affirm the judgment.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(A) — 8 cases
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State v. Cain, 888 A.2d 276 (Me. 2006). “Cain argues that the court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by sentencing him beyond the mandatory minimum penalties prescribed by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411. Finding no Sixth Amendment violation, we affirm the judgment.”
State of Maine v. Ryan Turner, 2017 ME 185 (Me. 2017).
State of Maine v. James A. Green, 2024 ME 44 (Me. 2024).
State of Maine v. Donald J. Thurlow, 2019 ME 166 (Me. 2019).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(A)(1) — 2 cases
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(A)(2) — 3 cases
State of Maine v. Kenneth A. Fay, 2015 ME 160 (Me. 2015).
State v. Cain, 888 A.2d 276 (Me. 2006). “Cain argues that the court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by sentencing him beyond the mandatory minimum penalties prescribed by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411. Finding no Sixth Amendment violation, we affirm the judgment.”
Blais v. State of Maine (Me. Super. Ct 2010).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(A)(3)(a) — 2 cases
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(A)(3)(b) — 4 cases
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State v. Chase, 2001 ME 168 (Me. 2001).
State v. Bavouset, 784 A.2d 27 (Me. 2001).
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(B) — 10 cases
State v. Rourke, 154 A.3d 127 (Me. 2017).
State v. Cain, 888 A.2d 276 (Me. 2006). “Cain argues that the court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by sentencing him beyond the mandatory minimum penalties prescribed by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411. Finding no Sixth Amendment violation, we affirm the judgment.”
State v. Chapman, 685 A.2d 423 (Me. 1996).
State v. Cote, 1999 ME 123 (Me. 1999).
DiPietro v. Sec'y of State, 802 A.2d 399 (Me. 2002).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(B)(1) — 2 cases
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “) upon her conditional guilty plea to charges of operating under the influence (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(B)(2), (5)(C) (2017), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.”
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(B)(2) — 2 cases
State v. Cook, 1998 ME 40 (Me. 1998).
State of Maine v. Gerald B. Kennedy, 2016 ME 53 (Me. 2016).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(B)(3) — 1 case
State of Maine v. Fidel Garcia, 2014 ME 150 (Me. 2014).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(B)(4) — 1 case
State of Maine v. Joshua Beeler, 2022 ME 47 (Me. 2022).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(C) — 3 cases
State v. Caswell, 2001 ME 23 (Me. 2001).
State of Maine v. David L. Violette, 2016 ME 65 (Me. 2016).
State of Maine v. Billy L. Beaulieu, 2025 ME 4 (Me. 2025).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(C)(4) — 1 case
State of Maine v. Donald J. Thurlow, 2019 ME 166 (Me. 2019).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(D) — 2 cases
State v. Cote, 1999 ME 123 (Me. 1999).
State v. Corliss, 1998 ME 36 (Me. 1998).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(E) — 1 case
State of Maine v. Donald J. Thurlow, 2019 ME 166 (Me. 2019).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(F) — 1 case
State v. Cormier, 928 A.2d 753 (Me. 2007).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(5)(G) — 1 case
State v. Ayotte, 207 A.3d 614 (Me. 2019).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(6) — 9 cases
State v. McLean, 2002 ME 171 (Me. 2002).
Carrier v. Sec'y of State, 60 A.3d 1241 (Me. 2012).
Pineo v. State, 2006 ME 119 (Me. 2006).
State v. Rees, 2000 ME 55 (Me. 2000).
State v. Stevens, 2007 ME 5 (Me. 2007). “Stevens’s motion to dismiss the indictment charging him with criminal OUI (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(2), (5)(D-1) (2005).”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(6)(B) — 2 cases
State of Maine v. Troy D. Hastey, 2018 ME 147 (Me. 2018). “Hastey was indicted for aggravated criminal OUI (Class B), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(2) (2017). 1 The enhancing factor alleged in the indictment is Hastey's 1991 manslaughter conviction that the State alleges "involve[ed] or result[ed] from the operation of a motor vehicle…”
State of Maine v. Troy D. Hastey, 2018 ME 147 (Me. 2018).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2411(C) — 1 case
State of Maine v. Burt (Me. Super. Ct 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.