Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2557 (2026)

Operating after habitual offender revocation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1993, c. 683, §A2 (NEW). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF). PL 1995, c. 65, §§A153,C15 (AFF). PL 1995, c. 65, §§C13,14 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 476, §1 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 776, §51 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 452, §§Q90-92 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 452, §X2 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 673, §§TT6,7 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 606, §A10 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: State v. Gorneault, 2007 ME 49 (Me. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Gorneault, 2007 ME 49 (Me. 2007). · cites it 2× “)(B)(3) (2006), and operating after habitual offender revocation (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2557(2)(B)(2) (2005), 1 entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, O’M ara, J.”
State v. Burgess, 2001 ME 117 (Me. 2001). · cites it 2× “) following a jury waived trial for operating a motor vehicle while his license was revoked based on his status as an habitual offender (Class C) in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557 (Supp.2000), 1 and for operating while under the influence (Class D) in violation of 29-A M.”
State v. Gilman, 2010 ME 35 (Me. 2010). · cites it 2× “Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.”
State v. Horr, 2003 ME 110 (Me. 2003). · cites it 3× “29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557(1). No proof of a mens rea is required.”
State v. Dunbar, 960 A.2d 1173 (Me. 2008). · cites it 4× “Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.”
State v. Grindle, 942 A.2d 673 (Me. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 1111(1) (2007), and operating after habitual offender revocation (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2557(1), (2)(A) (2006). 1 Grindle pleaded not guilty to the charges, and bail was set pending his jury trial.”
State v. Rideout, 761 A.2d 288 (Me. 2000). · cites it 3× “) on his conditional plea of guilty to the offense of operating a motor vehicle while his license was revoked as an habitual offender (Class C), 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557 (Supp.1999). 1 Rideout contends that the *289 Superior Court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress…”
State v. Taylor, 1997 ME 81 (Me. 1997). “§ 2298 was repealed and replaced by 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557 (1996) (effective Jan.”
State v. Eklund, 2000 ME 175 (Me. 2000). · cites it 2× “Ek-lund was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while her license was revoked based on her status as an habitual offender (Class C) in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557 (Supp.1999). 1 Eklund challenges *624 the ruling of the court (Warren /.”
State v. Cote, 1999 ME 123 (Me. 1999). · cites it 2× “) upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of operating after habitual offender revocation, 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557 (1996 & Supp.1998), and operating under the influence, 29-A M.”
State v. Saucier, 2001 ME 107 (Me. 2001). “Saucier was also found guilty of habitual motor vehicle offender (Class C), 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557 (1996 & Supp.2000), and eluding an officer (Class C), 29-A M.”
State v. Deschenes, 2001 ME 136 (Me. 2001). “§ 2412-A, or violation of the habitual offender law, 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557. Similarly, section 2431(4) abrogates the requirement that the State provide sufficient evidence of identification independent of any admission or confession of the defendant.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2557(1) — 7 cases
State v. Grindle, 942 A.2d 673 (Me. 2008). “§ 1111(1) (2007), and operating after habitual offender revocation (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2557(1), (2)(A) (2006). 1 Grindle pleaded not guilty to the charges, and bail was set pending his jury trial.”
State v. Horr, 2003 ME 110 (Me. 2003). “29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557(1). No proof of a mens rea is required.”
State v. Chase, 2001 ME 168 (Me. 2001).
State v. Griffin, 2003 ME 13 (Me. 2003).
State v. Dunbar, 960 A.2d 1173 (Me. 2008). “Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2557(1)(D) — 1 case
State v. Maloney, 785 A.2d 699 (Me. 2001).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2557(2)(B) — 3 cases
State v. Horr, 2003 ME 110 (Me. 2003). “29-A M.R.S.A. § 2557(1). No proof of a mens rea is required.”
State v. Dunbar, 960 A.2d 1173 (Me. 2008). “Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.”
State v. Grindle, 942 A.2d 673 (Me. 2008). “§ 1111(1) (2007), and operating after habitual offender revocation (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2557(1), (2)(A) (2006). 1 Grindle pleaded not guilty to the charges, and bail was set pending his jury trial.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2557(2)(B)(1) — 1 case
State v. Maloney, 785 A.2d 699 (Me. 2001).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29-A, § 2557(2)(B)(2) — 2 cases
State v. Gorneault, 2007 ME 49 (Me. 2007). “)(B)(3) (2006), and operating after habitual offender revocation (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2557(2)(B)(2) (2005), 1 entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, O’M ara, J.”
State v. Gilman, 2010 ME 35 (Me. 2010). “Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.