Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2153 (2026)

Enactment procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 216, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 582, §A37 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 737, §§A1,C106 (RP). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,C10 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1985 · leading case: Gabriel v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 390 A.2d 1065 (Me. 1978).
Gabriel v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 390 A.2d 1065 (Me. 1978). · cites it 2× “In addition, 30 M.R.S.A. § 2153 sets forth an enactment procedure by which a municipality may enact ordinances.”
George D. Ballard, Builder, Inc. v. City of Westbrook, 502 A.2d 476 (Me. 1985). “When the Legislature repealed § 662-A, it did so under the heading “An Act to Require Availability of Municipal Ordinances,” and at the same time, enacted a similar provision codified at 30 M.”
Crosby v. Inhabitants of Town of Ogunquit, 468 A.2d 996 (Me. 1983). “Initially, plaintiffs contend that in enacting the ordinance the town failed to comply with 30 M.R.S.A. § 2153(3) (1978 and Supp.1982-1983) which provides as follows: A municipality may enact ordinances by the following procedure.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2153(3) — 1 case
Crosby v. Inhabitants of Town of Ogunquit, 468 A.2d 996 (Me. 1983). “Initially, plaintiffs contend that in enacting the ordinance the town failed to comply with 30 M.R.S.A. § 2153(3) (1978 and Supp.1982-1983) which provides as follows: A municipality may enact ordinances by the following procedure.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2153(4) — 1 case
Gabriel v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 390 A.2d 1065 (Me. 1978). “In addition, 30 M.R.S.A. § 2153 sets forth an enactment procedure by which a municipality may enact ordinances.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2153(5) — 1 case
George D. Ballard, Builder, Inc. v. City of Westbrook, 502 A.2d 476 (Me. 1985). “When the Legislature repealed § 662-A, it did so under the heading “An Act to Require Availability of Municipal Ordinances,” and at the same time, enacted a similar provision codified at 30 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.