Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 4251 (2026)

General grant of powers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 429, §5 (RPR). PL 1969, c. 152, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 519, §4 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 770, §§167-169 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 322, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 737, §§A1,C106 (RP). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,C10 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1985 · leading case: Lehigh v. Pittston Co., 456 A.2d 355 (Me. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lehigh v. Pittston Co., 456 A.2d 355 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “Essentially, Pittston contends that because the City of Eastport has present authority to dispose of the airport under either the Revenue Producing Municipal Facilities Act, 30 M.R.S.A. § 4251 et seq. (1978 & Supp.1982-1983) or Municipal Home Rule, 30 M.”
Town of East Millinocket v. Town of Medway, 486 A.2d 739 (Me. 1985). “See 30 M.R.S.A. § 4251(4)-(13). . Because we uphold the tax exemption on the basis of section 4262, we need not reach the merits of the Plaintiffs cross-appeal concerning the applicability of the exemption provision in 36 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 4251(4) — 1 case
Town of East Millinocket v. Town of Medway, 486 A.2d 739 (Me. 1985). “See 30 M.R.S.A. § 4251(4)-(13). . Because we uphold the tax exemption on the basis of section 4262, we need not reach the merits of the Plaintiffs cross-appeal concerning the applicability of the exemption provision in 36 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.