Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30-A, § 3751 (2026)

Purpose

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Junkyards and so-called "auto graveyards" have been steadily expanding and frequently encroach upon highways. These junkyards and graveyards have become a nuisance and a menace to safe travel on public ways, often distracting the attention of drivers of motor vehicles because it appears cars are parked on the highway or that an accident has occurred. It is declared that such junkyards and automobile graveyards are a nuisance and are properly subject to regulation and control.   [PL 1987, c. 737, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1987, c. 737, Pt. C, §106 (NEW); PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD); PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD); PL 1989, c. 104, Pt. C, §§8, 10 (AMD).]
It is recognized that recycling of automobiles is a business enterprise that, when conducted in accordance with certain standards, differs from the enterprise of an automobile graveyard and that adoption of uniform state standards for this type of business enterprise would assist in development and regulation of that business.   [PL 1993, c. 173, §1 (NEW).]
Junkyards, automobile graveyards and automobile recycling businesses pose potential risks to the environment, particularly to groundwater and surface water quality if gasoline, oil or other fluids are not managed and disposed of properly. Proper location and operation of these facilities are critical to ensure protection of groundwater and surface water quality, other natural resources and the health and welfare of Maine citizens. These facilities may create nuisance conditions potentially affecting abutting landowners and others if not located and operated properly. For these reasons, it is declared that these facilities are appropriately subject to certain environmental and operational standards and to appropriate municipal and state regulation.   [PL 2003, c. 312, §2 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 737, §§A2,C106 (NEW). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,10 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 173, §1 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 312, §2 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2000–2019 · leading case: MSR Recycling, LLC v. Weeks & Hutchins, LLC, 2019 ME 125 (Me. 2019).
MSR Recycling, LLC v. Weeks & Hutchins, LLC, 2019 ME 125 (Me. 2019). “1 Pursuant to the Town’s Automobile Graveyard and Junkyards Ordinance, “Any person wishing to locate a new automobile graveyard or junkyard within the Town shall apply to the Selectmen for a permit required by state law pursuant to 30-A M.R.S.A. § 3751 et seq.” Madison, Me.”
Town of China v. Albert Althenn, 2013 ME 107 (Me. 2013). “*839 [¶ 7] The fact that Althenn disagrees with the trial court’s application of the statute to the facts of this particular case does not mean that the court misapprehended the meaning of the statute.”
Town of Mount Desert v. Smith, 751 A.2d 445 (Me. 2000). “) finding him in violation of the junkyards and automobile graveyards statute, 30-A M.R.S.A. § 3751 et seq. (1996). The Superior Court (Hancock County, Hjelm, J.”
Inhabitants of the Town of Sanford v. Nelson (Me. Super. Ct 2005). · cites it 3× “linquish its rights to prosecute Defendant for violating State law, the Zoning Ordinance and Property Maintenance Ordinance in consideration of the provisions set forth in the Consent Agreement; provided, however, that if the Defendant breached any terms of the Consent…”
MSR Recycling LLC v. Weeks & Hutchins, LLC (Me. Super. Ct 2018). “The Applicable Ordinance Regarding Automobile Graveyards and Junkyards Section 154-4 of Madison's ordinances mandates that anyone seeking to open a "junkyard" or "automobile graveyard" must apply to the Selectmen for a permit required by State law pursuant to 30-A M.R.S. §§ 3751…”
E. Perry Iron & Metal Co., Inc. v. City of Portland (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “" 30-A M.R.S. § 3751 (2005). It is conceivable that a property could be used for multiple purposes bringng it under the ambit of both laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.