Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13067 (2026)

Causes for disciplinary action

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1987, c. 395, §A212 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 53, §§3-5 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 129, §5 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 129, §16 (AFF). PL 2007, c. 402, Pt. BB, §11 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1988–1999 · leading case: June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Props., Inc., 676 A.2d 46 (Me. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Props., Inc., 676 A.2d 46 (Me. 1996). “Whether June Roberts violated any requirement of 32 M.R.S.A. § 13067 (1988 & Supp.1995) to act in good faith is necessarily a factual determination that depends on whether June Roberts was merely seeking to straighten things out with Venture prior to disclosing the referral fee…”

Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19 (Me. 1999). · cites it 2× “See 32 M.R.S.A. §§ 13067, 13068 (1988 & Pamph.”

Waxler v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 1998 ME 65 (Me. 1998). · cites it 3× “§ 13178 (1988) 1 and failed to allow a general office examination in violation of 32 M.R.S.A. § 13067(1)(F) (1988) 2 and Chapter 320, Section 4 of the Maine Real Estate Commission Rules and Regulations 3 and imposed certain sanctions.”

Golz v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 634 A.2d 1288 (Me. 1993). “See 32 M.R.S.A. § 13067(1)(K) (Supp.1992). *1290 The only references to unlicensed persons are in section 13067(1)(I), permitting disciplinary action against a licensee for the conduct of an unlicensed person, and in section 13067(1)(K), permitting the imposition of sanctions…”

Trott v. McPherson, 551 A.2d 854 (Me. 1988). “The statute as amended, 32 M.R.S.A. § 13067(1)(J) (1988), no longer contains this language.”

Winsor v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 695 A.2d 1198 (Me. 1997). · cites it 3× “) denying his petition for review and affirming an order of the Maine Real Estate Commission concluding that Winsor had violated 32 M.R.SA § 13067(1)(I)(2) (Supp.1996), 1 by permitting or authorizing an agent to perform brokerage services for an agency for which she did not hold…”

St. Hilaire v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 675 A.2d 956 (Me. 1996). “See 32 M.R.SA § 13067(1)(M) (Supp.1995). The Commission suspended the St.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13067(1)(F) — 1 case

Waxler v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 1998 ME 65 (Me. 1998). “§ 13178 (1988) 1 and failed to allow a general office examination in violation of 32 M.R.S.A. § 13067(1)(F) (1988) 2 and Chapter 320, Section 4 of the Maine Real Estate Commission Rules and Regulations 3 and imposed certain sanctions.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13067(1)(I)(2) — 1 case

Winsor v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 695 A.2d 1198 (Me. 1997). “) denying his petition for review and affirming an order of the Maine Real Estate Commission concluding that Winsor had violated 32 M.R.SA § 13067(1)(I)(2) (Supp.1996), 1 by permitting or authorizing an agent to perform brokerage services for an agency for which she did not hold…”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13067(1)(J) — 2 cases

Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19 (Me. 1999). “See 32 M.R.S.A. §§ 13067, 13068 (1988 & Pamph.”

Trott v. McPherson, 551 A.2d 854 (Me. 1988). “The statute as amended, 32 M.R.S.A. § 13067(1)(J) (1988), no longer contains this language.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13067(1)(K) — 1 case

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13067(1)(M) — 1 case

St. Hilaire v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 675 A.2d 956 (Me. 1996). “See 32 M.R.SA § 13067(1)(M) (Supp.1995). The Commission suspended the St.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.